Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/GRPSPAJ <p><strong>Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal </strong> </p> <p><strong>Publication Frequency : </strong>2 issues per year (Issue 1 : January - June, Issue 2 : July - December)</p> <p>ISSN 2821-949X (Online)</p> <p><strong>Focus and Scope : </strong>Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal (GRPSPAJ) is a peer-review journal of the Faculty of Political Science and Public Administration at Chiang Mai University, Thailand. It aims to publish unique and high-quality research and academic papers in the field of social science, politics and government, international relations, public administration, area studies, and development studies, political history. </p> <p><strong>There are no charges in connection with submitting and publishing an article in the Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal (GRPSPAJ)</strong></p> Faculty of Political Science and Public Administration, Chiang Mai University en-US Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal 2821-949X <p>Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><em>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)</em></a> licence, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information...</p> Coal Power Dynamic: The Double Effect Principle on Indonesian Energy Policy Legitimation https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/GRPSPAJ/article/view/3129 <p><span class="TextRun SCXW25528416 BCX0" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW25528416 BCX0">The year 2020 marked a significant moment for Indonesia with the controversial removal of “fly ash and bottom ash” (FABA) as toxic substances from its hazardous waste lists associated with coal burning. The conflicts arising from coal burning encompass socio-ecological, economic, health, and injustice issues. These issues include the destruction of ecosystems, health problems, and economic inequality from business-as-usual impacts. As a major user and producer of coal power plants, Indonesia typically prioritizes cost-efficiency. However, it often overlooks the negative externalities of consumption as undesirable effects. This problem is compounded by policies aimed at promoting coal production, resulting in an annual production of 10-15 million tons of less-managed FABA. This article reviews the “double effect” principle and analyzes government discourses and policies related to environmental protection and management through the “grammar of legitimation</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW25528416 BCX0">”.</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW25528416 BCX0"> It explores how these policies are connected to the growing negative consequences associated with coal-fired operations. Additionally, it delves into the escalating conflicts surrounding the coal-fired issue, which tend to generate cascading effects due to the government's “excess tolerance.” An evaluation of socio-ecological management is imperative to prevent gradual and sudden-onset adverse effects, including climate crisis risks and unsustainable development.</span></span><span class="EOP SCXW25528416 BCX0" data-ccp-props="{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}"> </span></p> Hanna Nur Afifah Yogar Warathida Chaiyapa Copyright (c) 2023 Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2023-12-27 2023-12-27 2 2 1 18 Development Innovation: Comparison of Digital Government Pathways in Estonia and Thailand https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/GRPSPAJ/article/view/3481 <p style="font-weight: 400;"><span class="TextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">The three </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">objectives</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0"> of this article were 1) to conduct a comparative study of Estonia's approach to digital government development compared to Thailand, </span></span><span class="TextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">2) to analyze the success of Estonia's digital government development approach, and 3) to suggest digital government development guidelines for Thailand. </span></span><span class="TextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">The main findings of this article were as follows. First, the process of development towards a digital government in the case of Estonia began to </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">emerge</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0"> in the early 1990s, with the government acting as the main driver of the development process. It was found that Estonia's digital government development process was divided into three phases, with Phase 1 </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">comprising</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0"> development-initiated states, Phase 2 </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">comprising</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0"> development states, and Phase 3 being developed states. Second, success in building and developing a digital government in the case </span></span><span class="TextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">of Estonia involved state-led development ideology and development networks playing a significant part in ensuring success </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">in the process of creating</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0"> and developing a digital government. Lastly, recommendations for Thailand's </span></span><span class="TextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">digital government development approach can be di</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">vided into 3 levels, including </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">1) the governmental level, which must play a leading role in the development of a digital government, incorporating the formulation of Thailand's digital government development plan by social conditio</span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">ns in the context of Thailand, </span><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">2) the network level, which requires building a network of governance from various sectors to drive Thailand's digital government development plan, and </span></span><span class="TextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW14940197 BCX0">3) the citizen level, at which digital citizenship is created through the education system to absorb and create so-called digital citizenship in line with Thailand's digital government development plan.</span></span><span class="EOP SCXW14940197 BCX0" data-ccp-props="{&quot;134233279&quot;:true,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}"> </span></p> Nutthawee Pumrachat Preechaya Nakfon Copyright (c) 2023 Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2023-12-27 2023-12-27 2 2 19 44 The Economic Structure of Greece Before and After the Global Financial Crisis https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/GRPSPAJ/article/view/2848 <p>The 2007–2008 financial crisis (GFC) affected the economic structure of Greece, including financial volatility, inflation and fiscal budgeting. This article studied changes in the economic structure before and after the GFC to discern differences and how the new structural economics and dependency theory defined the economic structure of Greece. Results were that before the GFC, the government economic structure used populist policies with inefficient financial coverage from the taxation system. Post-GFC, the fiscal budget was revised by assistance provision planning from international financial institutions. Government expenditures decreased and more tax was collected. These findings suggest that the economic structure was determined by external factors based on the complex modern financial system.</p> Naphakhawat Wanchai Copyright (c) 2023 Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2023-12-27 2023-12-27 2 2 45 82