Personal factors influencing the decision to choose eco-friendly airlines at Chiang Mai International Airport

ผู้แต่ง

  • Phichaya Maneerat International College, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Thailand.
  • Suthamanee Thanaboonruang International College, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Thailand.

คำสำคัญ:

Personal Factors, Eco-Friendly Airlines, Chiang Mai International Airport

บทคัดย่อ

As the environmental impact of the airline industry becomes a growing concern for both travelers and policymakers, demand for sustainable aviation continues to intensify. Despite the recent global growth in eco-friendly air travel options, research on Thai consumers’ attitudes and behaviors toward green airlines, and eco-friendly flight options in Thailand, remains limited. To address this gap, this study investigates how “personal factors” would influence Thai consumers’ decisions to choose environmentally friendly airline services. As an extension, this study provides research-based recommendations to support airlines design targeted marketing strategies for eco-friendly passengers, which are in accordance with the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) sustainability goals. For the purposes of this study, quantitative research was conducted on 420 passengers at Chiang Mai International Airport. Furthermore, this study employed a ‘one-way ANOVA’ method for the purposes of its statistical analysis. The results revealed that age, education, and income significantly influenced passengers’ decisions to fly with eco-friendly airlines, while gender appeared to have had little to no impact regarding this selection. These findings highlight the importance of targeting well-educated, middle-aged, and higher-income travelers who are more likely to choose sustainable options. However, the scope of this study is limited to a single airport. Future research may conduct at various airports across Thailand and apply mixed-method research to gain deeper information about Thai consumer behavior related to sustainable aviation.

References

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Aksoy, T., Yüksel, S., Dınçer, H., Hacioglu, U., & Maialeh, R. (2022). Complex Fuzzy Assessment of Green Flight Activity Investments for Sustainable Aviation Industry. IEEE Access, 10, 127297–127312. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3226584

Alam, M. M., & Zakaria, AFM. (2021). A probit estimation of urban bases of environmental awareness: Evidence from Sylhet City, Bangladesh. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.08342

Alaska Airlines. (n.d.). Transportation and aviation leaders launch sustainable biofuels initiative. Alaska Airlines. Retrieved May 23, 2025, from https://news.alaskaair.com/newsroom/transportation-and-aviation-leaders-launch-sustainable-biofuels-initiative/

Cole, S. (2024, March 18). The 14 Most Sustainable Airlines in the World (and Why). TheRoundup. https://theroundup.org/worlds-most-sustainable-airlines/

Cordes, H., Baumeister, S., & Käyrä, M. (2024). Factors influencing the willingness to pay for aviation voluntary carbon offsets: A literature review. European Journal of Tourism Research, 36, 3602. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v36i.2741

Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing. Harper & Row.

Han, H., Wong, A. K. F., Kim, S. (Sam), Cheng, X., & Chi, X. (2024). Assessing asymmetric selection of responsible airlines based on CSR, normative, and emotional factors: a complexity approach with SEM, fsQCA, and NCA. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 30(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2024.2437630

Han, M., & Rhee, K. J. (2021). The Structural Effect of Airlines Eco-Friendly Activities on Corporate Trust and Customer Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(3). https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-structural-effect-of-airlines-ecofriendly-activities-on-corporate-trust-and-customer-citizenship-behavior-10252.html

Hinnen, G., Hille, S. L., & Wittmer, A. (2015). Willingness to Pay for Green Products in Air Travel: Ready for Take-Off? Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1909

Hunt, C. S., Mello, J. E., & Deitz, G. D. (2018). Marketing (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Hwang, J., Choo, S., & Kim, W. (2018). A study on overall image and customer citizenship behavior in an environmentally friendly airline context: Focusing on the personal characteristics. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 30(11), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.31336/JTLR.2018.11.30.11.549

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2023). CORSIA participating states. ICAO. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/CORSIA/Pages/CORSIA_participating_States.aspx

Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001

Kaur, M., Singh, A., & Kaur, A. (2025). Eco-Friendly Skies: Sustainable Marketing Strategies for the Aviation Industry. In M. Bakır (Ed.), Sustainable Marketing Practices in the Aviation Industry (pp. 151-182). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7215-9.ch005

Koç, E. (2023). Green Marketing Strategies and Climate Change Awareness in Sustainable Transportation: The Case of Airline Companies. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 12(4), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1375842

Koo, S.-W., & Kang, M.-S. (2023). Understanding Sustainable Air Travel Consumption Behavior Applying Extended Planned Behavior Theory. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 35(Special), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.31336/JTLR.2023.4.35.sp2.241

Leenoi, P. (2024, July 5). CORSIA paving the way for flying net zero. Krungsri Research. https://www.krungsri.com/en/research/research-intelligence/corsia-2024

Masterson, R., Phillips, N., & Pickton, D. (2017). Marketing: An introduction (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nowacki, M., Chawla, Y., & Kowalczyk-Anioł, J. (2021). What Drives the Eco-Friendly Tourist Destination Choice? The Indian Perspective. Energies, 14(19), 6237. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196237

Ozdemir Ucgun, G., & Narci, M. T. (2022). The role of demographic factors in tourists’ sustainability consciousness, sustainable tourism awareness, and purchasing behavior. Journal of Tourismology, 8(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.26650/jot.2022.8.2.1102495

Peregrine, Z. (2024, November 3). Soaring Towards Sustainability by Selecting Airlines That Prioritize Environmental Responsibility. Wowfare. https://wowfare.com/blog/soaring-towards-sustainability-by-selecting-airlines-that-prioritize-environmental-responsibility/

Repková-Štofková, K., Bajza, F., & Janošková, P. (2023). Integration of sustainable development by selected low-cost airlines. Transportation Research Procedia, 74, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.115

Rochanasena, P., & Mekkaew, C. (2024). Factors affecting the decision to select full-service airlines on international routes in the new normal era of Generation Y and Generation Z. Journal of Administrative and Management Innovation, 12(1), 97–112. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RCIM/article/view/263820

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1976, April). On the Use of Content Specialists in the Assessment of Criterion-Referenced Test Item Validity (Report No. ED121845). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED121845

Rupcic, L., Pierrat, E., Saavedra Rubio, K., Thonemann, N., Ogugua, C., & Laurent, A. (2023). Environmental impacts in the civil aviation sector: Current state and guidance. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 119, Article 103717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103717

Santijitpakdee, T., Prapamontol, T., Ponsawansong, P., Kawichai, S., Taejajai, N., Song, W., Cao, F., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Oxidative Potential as a Health Risk Estimation of Ambient PM2.5 in Chiang Mai City, Northern Thailand: A Study in 2021. Proceedings, 102(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024102023

Schnurr, B., & Halkias, G. (2023). Made by her vs. him: Gender influences in product preferences and the role of individual action efficacy in restoring social equalities. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1327

Thai Airways International Public Company Limited. (2020). Sustainable development report 2019. https://ir.thaiairways.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/20200624-thai-sdreport2019-en-1.pdf

Yada, A. L., & Kumar, S. (2021). Demographic Controversies and Green Buying Intention: The Moderating Effects of Gender, Age, Income and Education. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 6177–6198. https://cibgp.com/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/1504

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis. John Weather Hill, Inc.

Yilmaz, M. K., & Kose, A. (2021). Sustainability in Full Service Carriers Versus Low Cost Carriers: A Comparison of Turkish Airlines and Pegasus Airlines. In U. Hacioglu & T. Aksoy (Eds.), Financial Ecosystem and Strategy in the Digital Era (pp. 293-324). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72624-9_13

Downloads

เผยแพร่แล้ว

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Maneerat, P., & Thanaboonruang, S. (2025). Personal factors influencing the decision to choose eco-friendly airlines at Chiang Mai International Airport. วารสารวิชาการการบิน การเดินทาง และการบริการ, 4(1), 1–18. สืบค้น จาก https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tft/article/view/7416