Navigation safety and risk management verification mechanism for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship

Authors

  • Shun-Ming Chang College of Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • P0-Chin Chiu Guangzhou institute of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China
  • Pai-Lung Chou Department of Risk Management and Insurance, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Abstract

This study proposes a systematic verification mechanism for navigation safety and risk management of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS). Through the mechanism to ensure the impact of the verification process of the relevant functions of maritime surface autonomous sailing ships and smart ships on the current actual maritime operating environment. The mechanism also examines the potential risks of innovative technologies to the internal and external environment through the collaboration of interdisciplinary experts and scholars. Then, evaluate whether to modify the operating norms and legal and regulatory requirements from the inside out. The research results provide an effective and systematic empirical verification mechanism for introducing innovative technology in the future society

References

ABS. (2022). Requirements for Autonomous and Remote-Control Functions. American Bureau of Shipping. https://ww2.eagle.org/en/rules-and-resources/rules-and-guides-v2.html

ABS. (2023a). Guide for Smart Functions for Marine Vessels and Offshore Units. https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/other/307-guide-for-smart-functions-for-marine-vessels-and-offshore-units-2023/307-smart-guide-dec23.pdf

ABS. (2023b). Guide for Smart Technologies for Shipyards. https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/other/336-guide-for-smart-technologies-for-shipyards/336-smart-yard-guide-feb23.pdf

Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents (2023). European Maritime Safety Agency. https://www.emsa.europa.eu/publications/reports/item/5052-annual-overview-of-marine-casualties-and-incidents.html

CCS. (2023). Guidance on Survey of Autonomous Navigation Notations. https://www.ccs.org.cn/ccswz/specialDetail?id=202304200978368142

Chang, C.-H., Kontovas, C., Yu, Q., & Yang, Z. (2021). Risk assessment of the operations of maritime autonomous surface ships. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 207, 107324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107324

Chen, Z., Chen, D., Zhang, Y., Cheng, X., Zhang, M., & Wu, C. (2020). Deep learning for autonomous ship-oriented small ship detection. Safety Science, 130, 104812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104812

ClassNK. (2024). Rules for Automatic and Remote-Control Systems / Guidance. https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/en/rules/tech_rules.aspx

Dawson, J., & Garikapati, D. (2021, April). Extending ISO26262 to an operationally complex system. In 2021 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9447146/

Enevoldsen, T. T., Blanke, M., & Galeazzi, R. J. I.-P. (2023). Autonomy for ferries and harbour buses: A collision avoidance perspective. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 56(2), 5735-5740.

Forsberg, K., & Mooz, H. (1991). The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle. CenterforSystemsManagement, 5333. https://damiantgordon.com/Methodologies/Papers/The%20Relationship%20of%20System%20Engineering%20to%20the%20Project%20Cycle.pdf

Geng, Y., Guo, M., Guo, H., & Chen, H. (2023). Safety range in bridge areas based on the influence of cross flow on ship navigation. Ocean Engineering, 281, 114649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114649

Henderson, K., & Salado, A. (2021). Value and benefits of model‐based systems engineering (MBSE): Evidence from the literature. Systems Engineering, 24(1), 51-66.

IMO. (2018). IMO takes first steps to address autonomous ships. International Maritime Organization. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/08-MSC-99-mass-scoping.aspx

IMO. (2021). Outcome of the Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use of Maritime AutonomousSurfaceShips(MASS). https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/pages/MASSRSE2021.aspx

International maritime organization, I. (2018a). MSC 99/5 - REGULATORY SCOPING EXERCISE FOR THE USE OF MARITIME AUTONOMOUS SURFACE SHIPS (MASS). Maritime Safety Committee, London, UK.

International maritime organization, I. (2018b). MSC 100/INF.3 - REGULATORY SCOPING EXERCISE FOR THE USE OF MARITIME AUTONOMOUS SURFACE SHIPS (MASS). Maritime Safety Committee, London, UK.

Kim, D., Yim, J., Song, S., Park, J.-B., Kim, J., Yu, Y., Elsherbiny, K., & Tezdogan, T. (2023). Path-following control problem for maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS) in adverse weather conditions at low speeds. Ocean Engineering, 287, 115860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115860

KR. (2024). Guidance for Autonomous Ships. Korean Register. https://www.krs.co.kr/KRRules/KRRules2024/KRRulesE.html

Lee, H.-J., & Kim, D. (2025). Navigating narrow waterways: A quantitative study on timing of stand-on ship actions for cooperative collision avoidance for MASS. Ocean Engineering, 322,120400.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120400

MacKinnon, S. N., Man, Y., Lundh, M., & Porathe, T. (2015). Command and control of unmanned vessels: Keeping shore based operators in-the-loop. 18th International Conference on Ships and Shipping Research, NAV,

Maidana, R. G., Kristensen, S. D., Utne, I. B., & Sørensen, A. J. (2023). Risk-based path planning for preventing collisions and groundings of maritime autonomous surface ships. OceanEngineering, 290,116417.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116417

MPA. (2023). MPA IMPLEMENTS JUST IN TIME PLANNING AND COORDINATION PLATFORM. https://britanniapandi.com/2023/11/mpa-implements-just-in-time-planning-and-coordination-platform/

Nguyen, T. T. D., Mai, V. T., Lee, S., & Yoon, H. K. (2022). An Experimental Study on Hydrodynamic Forces of Korea Autonomous Surface Ship in Various Loading Conditions. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 46(2), 73-81.https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO202214049471881.page

Norris, J. N. (2018). Human Factors in Military Maritime and Expeditionary Settings: Opportunity for Autonomous Systems?. In Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, July 17− 21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA 8 (pp. 139-147). Springer International Publishing.

Porathe, T., Prison, J., & Man, Y. (2014). Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships. Proceedings of Human Factors in Ship Design & Operation, 26-27 February 2014, London, UK.

Rødseth, Ø. J., Wennersberg, L. A. L., & Nordahl, H. (2023). Improving safety of interactions between conventional and autonomous ships. Ocean Engineering, 284, 115206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115206

Rolls-Royce, K. (2018). Rolls-royce and finferries demonstrate world’s first fully autonomous ferry. https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/press-releases/2018/03-12-2018-rr-and-finferries-demonstrate-worlds-first-fully-autonomous-ferry.aspx

Shenoi, R., Bowker, J., Dzielendziak, A. S., Lidtke, A. K., Zhu, G., Cheng, F., Argyos, D., Fang, I., Gonzalez, J., & Johnson, S. (2015). Global marine technology trends 2030.

Shi, P., Gao, M., Chen, S., Jing, Q., Xia, Y., Han, Y., & Zhang, A. (2025). MASS intelligent collision avoidance decision-making based on ship pose estimation and COLREGs quantification. OceanEngineering,335,121679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121679

Tang, Y., Yang, C., Xia, Y., Cao, L., & Zhang, J. (2025). Towards MASS: A concept and a framework for operating only once of electromechanical devices on ocean-going merchant vessels. Ocean Engineering, 330, 121319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121319

Tao, J., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Wang, J., Rao, S., & Yang, Z. (2025). Team task complexity analysis in MASS operation using a fuzzy TOPSIS method. Ocean Engineering, 329, 121140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121140

Wahlström, M., Hakulinen, J., Karvonen, H., & Lindborg, I. (2015). Human Factors Challenges in Unmanned Ship Operations – Insights from Other Domains. Procedia Manufacturing,3,1038-1045. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.167

Wang, C., Cai, X., Li, Y., Zhai, R., Wu, R., Zhu, S., Guan, L., Luo, Z., Zhang, S., & Zhang, J.(2024). Research and Application of Panoramic Visual Perception-AssistedNavigation Technology for Ships. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(7).

Yan, Z., Wang, H., & Zhang, M. (2024). Learning-based adaptive neural control for safer navigation of unmanned surface vehicle with variable mass. Ocean Engineering, 313, 119471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119471

Zheng, K., Zhang, X., Wang, C., Li, Y., Cui, J., & Jiang, L. (2024). Adaptive collision avoidance decisions in autonomous ship encounter scenarios through rule-guided vision supervised learning. Ocean Engineering, 297, 117096. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117096

Additional Files

Published

30.06.2025

How to Cite

Chang, S.-M., Chiu, P.-C., & Chou, P.-L. (2025). Navigation safety and risk management verification mechanism for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship. Journal of China-ASEAN Studies, 5(2), 56–66. retrieved from https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JCAS/article/view/8020

Issue

Section

Articles