Law’s Political Foundations in East Asia: The View from Recent Scholarship on China and Japan

Main Article Content

Jason Michael Morgan

Abstract

In a 2016 monograph, legal scholar of East Asia John Owen Haley explores the “political foundations” of public and private law. This is an important intervention because of the questions Haley raises about the bedrock of the legal order. Haley’s scope is global and diachronic, but in this essay I will limit my scope to Japan and China, largely in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. With Haley’s insights in the background, my goal is to understand better how politics has shaped law and legal practice in these East Asian countries over the past dozen or so decades, and thereby to discover new ways of seeing the present geopolitical and transnational-legal dispensation in the region. I survey, including Haley’s monograph, fourteen recent volumes, as well as a handful of relevant scholarly essays, to help situate the discussion of law’s political foundations in East Asia within the broader and evolving scholarship. I focus on Japan and China as a way to highlight differences even between two major countries in the East Asian sphere. My argument is that the foundations of law are not always political, and that, conversely, sometimes law and politics are not separable in the first place. The modern history of East Asia—Japan and China, but also from throughout the region—provides many examples of this more complex reading of law and politics.

Article Details

How to Cite
Michael Morgan, J. . (2022). Law’s Political Foundations in East Asia: The View from Recent Scholarship on China and Japan. Journal of Integrative and Innovative Humanities, 2(2), 5–26. Retrieved from https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DJIIH/article/view/1123
Section
Research article

References

Bacevich, A. J. (2010). Washington rules: America’s path to permanent war. Metropolitan Books.

Balachandran, A. (2019). Petitions, the city, and the early colonial state in South India. Modern Asian Studies, 53(1), 150-176.

Chen, K-H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Duke University Press.

Ching, L. T. S. (2019). Anti-Japan: The politics of sentiment in postcolonial East Asia. Duke University Press.

Clarke, D. C. (2020). Anti Anti-Orientalism, or Is Chinese Law Different? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 68, 55-94.

Gallicchio, M. (2020). Unconditional: The Japanese surrender in World War II. Oxford University Press.

Ginsburg, T. (2009). Studying Japanese law because it’s there. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 58(1), 15-25.

Ginsburg, T., & Chen, A. H. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Administrative law and governance in Asia: Comparative perspectives. Routledge.

Ginsburg, T., & Moustafa, T. (Eds.). (2008). Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritative regimes. Cambridge University Press.

Haley, J. O. (2016). Law’s political foundations: Rivers, rifles, rice, and religion. Edward Elgar.

Harris, T. S. (2020). The iconoclast: Shinzō Abe and the new Japan. Hurst & Company.

Hirschl, R. (2020). City, state: Constitutionalism and the megacity. Oxford University Press.

McCormack, G. (2016). Japan: Prime minister Abe Shinzo’s agenda. Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 14(24 no.1).

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The great delusion: Liberal dreams and international realities. Yale University Press.

O’Hanlon, M. E. (2019). The Senkaku paradox: Risking great power war over small stakes. Brookings Institution Press.

Paine, S. C. M. (2017). The Japanese Empire: Grand strategy from the Meiji Restoration to the Pacific War. Cambridge University Press.

Ramseyer, J. M. (2012). The fable of land reform: Expropriation and redistribution in occupied Japan. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2166688

Ramseyer, J. M. (2019). Amerika kara mita Nihon hō: An American perspective on Japanese law. Yūhikaku.

Ramseyer, J. M., & Rasmusen E. B. (2001). Why are Japanese judges so conservative in politically charged cases? American Political Science Review, 95(2), 331-344.

Ruskola, T. (2013). Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and modern law. Harvard University Press.

Sweet, A. S., & Mathews, J. (2009). Proportionality balancing and global constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 47.

Ward, M. M. (2019). Thought crime: Ideology and state power in interwar Japan. Duke University Press.

Yang, H. (2014). Jenosaido to bunka daikakumei: Uchi Mongoru no minzoku mondai [Genocide and the Cultural Revolution: The ethnicity problem in Inner Mongolia]. Bensei Shuppan.

Yang, H. (2019). Gyakuten no dai Chūgoku shi: Eurasia no shiten kara [The history of the great state of China turned on its head: As seen from the viewpoint of Eurasia]. Bungei Shunjū.

Yellen, J. A. (2019). The Greater East Asia co-prosperity sphere: When total empire met total war. Cornell University Press.