A Phenomenological Approach to Understanding Different Perceptual Interests Interactions Between Endometriosis Patients and Their Physicians
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Understanding patients’ experiences of illness is critical to successful and holistic treatment. It is especially important in illnesses associated with diagnosis delays and mismanagement, like endometriosis. Endometriosis affects ten percent of reproductive age females globally but remains poorly recognized due to a lack of understanding from society and the healthcare system, an under-appreciation of women’s pain, and stigmatization. The broader structural implications of the paucity in research and physician training reveal neglect of patient embodiment and denial of women’s pain within medicine. By focusing on the history of endometriosis, the way it has been conceptualized through patient and physician perspectives, and the way it is part of a larger history of dismissing women’s pain, we examine the ways in which a phenomenological approach bridges the differences in perception between patient and physician as well as patient and society.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of TCI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information.
References
As-Sanie, S., Black, R., Giudice, L. C., Valbrun, T. G., Gupta, J., Jones, B., Laufer, M. R., Milspaw, A. T., Missmer, S. A., Norman, A., Taylor, R. N., Wallace, K., Williams, Z., Yong, P. J., Nebel, R. A. (2019). Assessing research gaps and unmet needs in endometriosis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 221(2), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.033
Bullo, S. & Weckesser, A. (2021). Addressing challenges in endometriosis pain communication between patients and doctors: The role of language, Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 2, 764693, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.764693
Carel H. Phenomenology and its application in medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2011 Feb;32(1):33-46. doi: 10.1007/s11017-010-9161-x. PMID: 21103940.
Fernley, N. (2021). That one doctor. . . qualitative thematic analysis of 49 women’s written accounts of their endometriosis diagnosis. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders, 13(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2284026520984366
Fricker, M. (2011). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books.
Hick, C. (1999). The art of perception: from the life world to the medical gaze and back again, Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2(2), 129-40. https://doi:10.1023/a:1009989000368
Hoffmann, D. E. & Tarzian, A. J. (2001). The girl who cried pain: a bias against women in the treatment of pain, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2001.tb00037.x
Hudson, N. (2022). The missed disease? Endometriosis as an example of ‘undone science,’ Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 14, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.003
Jones, C. (2015). Wandering wombs and ‘female troubles’: The hysterical origins, symptoms, and treatments of endometriosis, Women’s Studies, 44(8), 1083–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2015.1078212
Kapsalis, T. (1997). Public Privates: Performing Gynecology from Both Ends of the Speculum. Duke University Press.
Leder, D. (1984). Medicine and paradigms of embodiment, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 9(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/9.1.29
Metzl, J. M., & Hansen, H. (2014). Structural competency: Theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality, Social Science & Medicine, 103, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032
Nielsen, L. J., Poulsen, K., Funch, A. L., Petersen, K. S. (2023). The lived experiences of endometriosis in adolescence—a critical hermeneutic perspective, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 37(4), 1038–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13176
Seear, K. (2009). The etiquette of endometriosis: Stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay. Social Science & Medicine, 69(8), 1220-1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.023
Shaw, J. (2012). The birth of the clinic and the advent of reproduction: Pregnancy, pathology and the medical gaze in modernity, Body & Society, 18(2), 110–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x10394666
Sims, O. T., Gupta, J., Missmer, S. A., Aninye, I. O (2021). Stigma and endometriosis: a brief overview and recommendations to improve psychosocial well-being and diagnostic delay, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 8210, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158210
Svenaeus F. A Defense of the Phenomenological Account of Health and Illness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2019 Jul 29;44(4):459-478. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhz013. PMID: 31356662; PMCID: PMC6663122.
Young, K., Fisher, J., Kirkman, M. (2018). ‘Do mad people get endo or does endo make you mad?’: Clinicians’ discursive constructions of medicine and women with endometriosis, Feminism & Psychology, 29(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353518815704
Whelan, E. (2007). ‘No one agrees except for those of us who have it’: Endometriosis patients as an epistemological community, Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(7), 957–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01024.x
World Health Organization. (2023). Endometriosis. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/endometriosis
Zale, M., Lambert, E., LaNoue, M. D., Leader, A. E. (2020). Shedding light on endometriosis: Patient and provider perspectives on a challenging disease, Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders, 12(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2284026520905239