SURROGACY AND MOTHERHOOD: WOMEN'S VOICES AND LIVED EXPERIENCES
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the meanings attributed to commercial surrogacy and perceptions of motherhood among Thai women who had experienced commercial surrogacy arrangements. A qualitative research approach was employed. Data were collected from 28 key informants selected through purposive and snowball sampling techniques using semi-structured in-depth interviews. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. In the Thai context, commercial surrogacy is prohibited under the Protection of Children Born from Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act, B.E. 2558 (2015). The findings revealed that women involved in commercial surrogacy constructed four major meanings of surrogacy: 1) a means of survival during economic hardship, 2) an opportunity to fulfill personal aspirations and achieve future financial security, 3) a form of work undertaken for the well-being of their families, and 4) an act of giving life and helping to create families for individuals experiencing infertility. Regarding perceptions of motherhood, the findings identified two distinct perspectives: 1) women who developed emotional attachment to the fetus and experienced emotional distress after relinquishing the child, and 2) women who maintained emotional distance from the fetus and defined motherhood primarily through their roles in raising their own children. The experiences of women who had participated in commercial surrogacy, a practice that is not recognized under Thai law, reflect the complex interplay among motherhood, economic inequality, and gender inequality. These findings underscore the importance of developing policies and protective measures that safeguard women's rights and human dignity within the context of contemporary reproductive technologies.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
ปิ่นแก้ว เหลืองอร่ามศรี. (2566). ครรภ์แห่งชาติ: รัฐเจริญพันธุ์ ร่างกาย และเพศวิถี. กรุงเทพมหานคร: ศูนย์มานุษยวิทยาสิรินธร (องค์การมหาชน).
พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองเด็กที่เกิดโดยอาศัยเทคโนโลยีช่วยการเจริญพันทางการแพทย์. (2558). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่ม 132 ตอนที่ 38 ก หน้า 1-12 (1 พฤษภาคม 2558).
ศิริโสภา สันติทฤษฎีกร. (2567). การศึกษาไม่ใช่คำตอบสุดท้าย: มรดกทางความคิดของวอลสโตนคราฟต์กับการต่อสู้ของผู้หญิงร่วมสมัย. วารสารคณะรัฐศาสตร์และรัฐประศาสนศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี, 1(ฉบับพิเศษ), 77-95.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Hibino, Y. (2023). The advantages and disadvantages of altruistic and commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 18(8), 1-10.
Horsey, K. (2024). The future of surrogacy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 48(5), 1-16.
Jana, M. & Hammer, A. (2021). Reproductive work in the global South: Surrogacy as clinical labour. Work, Employment and Society, 36(5), 1-22.
McLachlan, H. V. & Swales, J. K. (2009). Commercial surrogate motherhood and the alleged commodification of children: A defense of legally enforceable contracts. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(3), 91-107.
Pande, A. (2010). Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(4), 969-992.
Parks, J. A. (2010). Care ethics and the global practice of commercial surrogacy. Bioethics, 24(7), 333-340.
Peet, J. L. . (2016). A womb that is (not always) one’s own: Commercial surrogacy in a globalized world. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18(2), 171-189.
Spar, D. (2005). For love and money: the political economy of commercial surrogacy. Review of International Political Economy, 12(2), 287-309.
Williams-Jones, B. (2002). Commercial surrogacy and the redefinition of motherhood. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law, 2(2), 1-16.