A STUDY OF THE COMPONENTS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USE IN LEARNING MANAGEMENT AMONG PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to study and validate the components of artificial intelligence utilization for learning management among primary school teachers. Documentary research and expert interviews were employed. The data sources consisted of 20 relevant academic documents, research articles, and scholarly articles published between 2016 and 2024, together with five experts who were purposively selected based on their knowledge, expertise, or experience in artificial intelligence, digital technology, learning management, teacher development, and educational measurement and evaluation. The research instruments were a document analysis form and a semi - structured interview form. Data were analyzed using content analysis, categorization, component synthesis, frequency distribution, and expert validation. The selection criterion required each component to appear in at least 10 sources, or 50 percent of all data sources. The findings revealed that artificial intelligence utilization for learning management among primary school teachers consisted of five components and 25 behavioral indicators:
1) learning management planning using artificial intelligence, identified in 17 sources, accounting for 85 percent; 2) instructional media and learning innovation production using artificial intelligence, identified in 18 sources, accounting for 90 percent; 3) learning activity management using artificial intelligence, identified in 15 sources, accounting for 75 percent; 4) learning measurement and evaluation using artificial intelligence, identified in 14 sources, accounting for 70 percent; and 5) ethics and safety in the use of artificial intelligence, identified in 17 sources, accounting for 85 percent. The component with the highest frequency was instructional media and learning innovation production using artificial intelligence. The expert interviews confirmed that all five components were appropriate, comprehensive in covering the learning management process of primary school teachers, and applicable as a framework for teacher development and the further development of research instruments
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Holmes, W. et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison - Wesley Publishing Company.
Kasneci, E. et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410.
Luckin, R. et al. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson.
Miao, F. & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO.
OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Cambridge: Polity Press.
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy - makers. Paris: UNESCO.
__________. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. Paris: UNESCO.
UNICEF. (2022). Educators’ digital competence framework. Retrieved July 1, 2026, from https://www.unicef.org/eca/reports/educators-digital-competence-framework
Yan, L. et al. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370.
