“THE DYNAMICS OF LANGUAGE” REFORMING 21st-CENTURY ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING THROUGH A HOLISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLECTUAL SUSTAINABILITY

Main Article Content

Sitthichai Sheewaroros
Phrakhru Prachotkichchaporn (Suriyan Choochusy)
Nicharee Preecha
Phrakru Phromkhetkanarak (Chaiyasit Reungrod)
Narong Benjasak

Abstract

English language learning in the 21st century has become a critical challenge for the Thai educational system amid the rapid and complex transformations of society, technology, and the economy. Current instructional practices, which still emphasize rote memorization and grammar over authentic communication, together with the lack of integration of spirituality and ethics, fail to meet the holistic development of learners. Although previous studies have proposed various teaching approaches, including active learning, digital technology, and intercultural communication, a significant knowledge gap remains in developing a holistic framework that systematically connects language skills with intellectual growth, ethical awareness, and social responsibility in a sustainable manner. This article pursues three primary objectives: 1) to analyze the dynamics of English language learning in the 21st century within the broader contexts of social, cultural, and technological change; 2) to propose a holistic reform framework that meaningfully integrates Buddhist philosophy with modern educational approaches; and
3) to present both scholarly findings and practical insights that can be effectively applied to curriculum design and policy development in English language education. The synthesis of findings highlights that a holistic framework comprising four dimensions cognitive, spiritual, socio-cultural, and technological possesses strong potential to cultivate learners with advanced linguistic competence, sustainable intellectual capacity, and ethical values deeply aligned with the Thai socio-cultural context. Accordingly, this article contributes significantly to advancing English language curricula that not only enhance global competitiveness but also preserve cultural identity, encourage social harmony, and lay the foundation for the intellectual sustainability of learners in the long term. The reform approach emphasized here underscores that English language education should move beyond narrow linguistic outcomes toward nurturing well-rounded individuals who embody knowledge, moral integrity, adaptability, and a sense of social responsibility. These qualities are indispensable for thriving in today’s interconnected and rapidly evolving world and for preparing learners to become responsible global citizens who can contribute constructively to both local and international communities

Article Details

How to Cite
Sheewaroros, S. ., (Suriyan Choochusy), P. P. ., Preecha, N. ., (Chaiyasit Reungrod), P. P. ., & Benjasak, N. . (2025). “THE DYNAMICS OF LANGUAGE” REFORMING 21st-CENTURY ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING THROUGH A HOLISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLECTUAL SUSTAINABILITY. Journal of Social Science Development, 8(10), 205–213. retrieved from https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSSD/article/view/8796
Section
Academic Article

References

ปวีณา คูราน่า และคณะ. (2567). การจัดการศึกษาแบบองค์รวม เพื่อเสริมสร้างความเป็นมนุษย์ที่สมบูรณ์ในบริบทสังคมไทย. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 9(9), 867-881.

Albiladi, W. S. & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232-238.

Au, K. H. (2007). Culturally responsive instruction: Application to multiethnic classrooms. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2(1), 1-18.

Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Boud, D. et al. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge.

Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4-20.

Byram, M. (2020). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. (2nd ed.). Bristol: Channel View Publications.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Involving language learners in creating virtual reality experiences: From passive consumers to active producers. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 102-117.

Graddol, D. (2006). English Next. London, UK: British Council.

Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. New Jersey: Wiley.

Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing. (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Jacobs, G. M. & Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Teacher's toolkit: Developing active learning pedagogy in language education. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144-156.

Kramsch, C. (2021). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning [Revisited]. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 1-9.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5-12.

Miller, R. (2019). Holistic education: An introduction to the philosophy and practice. Vermont: Foundation for Educational Renewal.

Payutto, P. A. (1995). Buddhadhamma: Natural laws and values for life. Bangkok: Buddhadhamma Foundation.

Rahula, W. (1974). What the Buddha taught. New York: Grove Press.

Sterling, S. (2011). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Darlington: Green Books.

Thich Nhat Hanh. (1991). Peace is every step: The path of mindfulness in everyday life. New York: Bantam Books.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Wang, W. & Lyu, C. (2025). The Effectiveness of Production-Oriented Approach on Students’ English Language Skills: A Meta-Analysis. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 34, 1763-1780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-00990-2.

Wiek, A. et al. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability science, 6(2), 203-218.