Sanctions Under The Social Security Act For Employers

Authors

  • Jomjan Kotchasung No. 114, Sukhumvit 23 Alley, Khlong Toei Nuea, Watthana, Bangkok 10110

Keywords:

Sanctions, Social Security, Employer

Abstract

          This academic article aims to study the limitations hindering the effective enforcement of the Social Security Act, B.E. 2533 (1990), specifically regarding the sanctions imposed on employers. The study finds that current statutory sanctions are excessively low, failing to serve as an effective deterrent against economic offenses. This leads employers to perceive fines merely as a cost of doing business, which they are willing to incur in exchange for non-compliance. Furthermore, a significant issue arises where employers deliberately submit required documents but withhold actual payments to circumvent criminal liability, as the law lacks direct criminal sanctions for outstanding contributions. Meanwhile, the imposition of sanctions on legal entities faces constraints due to low fine ceilings and evidentiary hurdles in proving the liability of authorized persons. Additionally, the exercise of discretionary power by officials in settling fines without clear standardized criteria undermines public confidence in the justice system and creates competitive inequality. Consequently, it is recommended that the sanction rates be revised to align with current economic conditions, more stringent administrative measures be introduced to regulate employer behavior, and clear guidelines for fine settlements be established to preserve the sanctity of legal sanctions and ensure the genuine stability of the Social Security Fund.

References

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.

Braithwaite, J. (1985). To punish or persuade: Enforcement of coal mine safety. State University of New York Press.

Coffee, J. C., Jr. (1981). “No soul to damn: No body to kick”: An unscandalized inquiry into the problem of corporate punishment. Michigan Law Review, 79(3), 386–459.

Fisse, B., & Braithwaite, J. (1993). Corporations, crime and accountability. Cambridge University Press.

Gobert, J., & Punch, M. (2003). Rethinking corporate crime. Butterworths.

International Labour Organization. (2017). World social protection report 2017–2019: Universal social protection to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. International Labour Office.

International Labour Organization. (2021). World social protection report 2020–22: Social protection at the crossroads – In pursuit of a better future. International Labour Office.

International Labour Organization. (2021). World social protection report 2020–22: Social protection at the crossroads – In pursuit of a better future. International Labour Office.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). OECD regulatory policy outlook 2018. OECD Publishing.

Social Security Act B.E. 2533 [1990]. (1990). Royal Thai Government Gazette.

Social Security Office. (2023). Social security information and statistics. Ministry of Labour, Thailand.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2015). Resource guide on good practices in the protection of reporting persons. United Nations.

World Bank. (2013). The World Bank pension reform primer: Social pensions. World Bank.

World Justice Project. (2023). Rule of Law Index 2023. World Justice Project.

Downloads

Published

01-07-2026

How to Cite

Kotchasung, J. (2026). Sanctions Under The Social Security Act For Employers. SRIPATUM LAW JOURNAL, 11(1), 194–208. retrieved from https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Lawllmjournal/article/view/9651

Issue

Section

Academic article