The Application of AI in Customs Control: A Legal and Comparative Justice Analysis
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; Customs Control; Customs; Comparative Law; Justice ProcessAbstract
In the era of digital transformation, the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in customs control has become a key strategy for enhancing the efficiency of risk management, goods screening, and data verification processes-delivering greater accuracy, speed, and automation. However, the application of AI in the public sector, particularly within customs enforcement, continues to face significant legal and ethical challenges. These include algorithmic transparency, explainability of outcomes, the legal admissibility of machine-generated evidence, and the protection of human rights.
This article aims to examine the legal dimensions of AI use in customs control, with a particular focus on comparative analysis of legal frameworks and policy practices in jurisdictions with well-established approaches, such as the European Union, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, South Korea, China, Singapore, and Taiwan. The findings indicate that these countries emphasize transparency, auditability, state accountability, and the right to fair treatment. In contrast, Thailand currently lacks a dedicated legal framework for governing AI in the context of customs administration.
Accordingly, this article proposes policy recommendations to support the development of AI-specific laws and regulatory guidelines in the Thai customs context. These recommendations cover key issues such as algorithmic impact assessments, oversight mechanisms, complaint handling systems, and avenues for redress. By undertaking this approach, the article contributes to the body of knowledge in the field of law and technology, while offering normative guidance for the ethical and equitable integration of AI into Thailand’s public sector decision-making.
References
Akçay, S., Breckon, T. P., & Kundegorski, M. E. (2022). Using deep convolutional neural networks for x-ray baggage threat detection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 138, 312–318. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2020.04.005
Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the 'good society': The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505–528. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
Digital Government Development Agency. (2021). Guidelines for AI governance in the Thai public sector. Bangkok: Digital Government Development Agency (Public Organization). Retrieved from https://www.dga.or.th/
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Retrieved from https://eur lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled artificial intelligence: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI.
Berkman Klein Center Research Publication (2020-1). Retrieved from https://cyber. harvard.edu/publication/2020/principled-ai
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., et al. (2018). AI4People -An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Hassan, R., Mahmud, M., & Alam, M. (2020). Intelligent customs control using AI and big data analytics. Journal of Border Security and Artificial Intelligence, 3(1), 20–35.
IMDA (Infocomm Media Development Authority). (2020). Model AI governance framework (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.imda.gov.sg/
Jaccard, N., Wiliem, A., Bhalerao, A., & Lovell, B. C. (2019). Automated detection of contraband in x-ray images using deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(3), 1535–1545. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2877287
Liu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Legal challenges in China's AI governance: From data protection to algorithmic accountability. Tsinghua China Law Review, 14(1), 44–67.
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). (2022). Australian privacy principles and AI ethics framework. Retrieved from https://www.oaic.gov.au/
Punyachai, T. (2021). The reliability of evidence from intelligent systems in judicial proceedings. Journal of Contemporary Law, 7(1), 77–96.
Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017). Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1–17.
Veale, M., & Brass, I. (2019). Administration by algorithm? Public management meets public sector machine learning. Public Money & Management, 39(5), 377–384.
World Customs Organization (WCO). (2021). Study report on disruptive technologies. Retrieved from https://www.wcoomd.org/
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Buddhist ASEAN Studies Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.