Approaches for Propelling the Development of the Southern Border Provinces of Thailand in the Context of Insurgency Situations
Main Article Content
Abstract
The insurgency situation in the southern border provinces adversely affects the lives and properties of the populace and hampers regional development. This research aims to explore approaches for propelling the development of the southern border provinces of Thailand within the context of conflict. It employed a qualitative research approach, collecting data through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with key informants purposively sampled in 6 groups of 10 people each, totaling 60 people. The sample consists of community leaders, local government leaders, folk philosophers, civil society officials, government agency officials, officers of the Internal Security Operations Command, and officials of the Southern Border Provinces Administrative Centre. Thematic analysis of the data revealed 21 primary development approaches covering six aspects: 1) Economic Development, with eight approaches focusing on occupational development for citizens role adjustment of SBPAC as a coordinator, development of centralized halal trade hubs, promotion of agricultural-industrial cities, grassroots economic empowerment, people enhancement for work, employment creation for vulnerable groups, export promotion, and investment facilitation; 2) Social Development, with five approaches including attitude adjustment towards self-reliance, care for children, youth, and vulnerable groups, fostering peaceful communities, establishing social development networks, and ensuring justice;
3) Human Resource Development, encompassing two approaches focusing on enhancing the competency of state personnel to support local initiatives and aligning community competencies with local contexts; 4) Public Sector Management, with two approaches comprising the establishment of digital platforms for public service delivery and promotion of professionalism among personnel;
5) Security Enhancement, with one approache focusing on improving citizen feedback processes; and 6) Understanding Fostering, with three approaches including an enhancement of understanding of the conflict situation among both local and international communities, creating an image of a peaceful space and the development of a robust information dissemination system.
Article Details
References
Abdulmani, L. (2013). Conflict resolution: A case study of the separatist movement in the southern border provinces of Thailand. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 1-14.
Arelae, P., & Mintrasak, N. (2022). Development a causal model for personnel management in the multicultural society of area 3 southern border provinces to create the competitiveness of the organization in the digital era. Journal of Buddhist Anthropology, 7(6), 283-299.
Boonpunth, K. C., & Rolls, M. G. (2017). Peace survey–lessons learned from northern Ireland to southern Thailand. ASR: CMU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 133- 151.
Boonrith, B. (2013). Southern insurgency in the three border provinces, local people identity and government official behavior. Kasem Bundit Journal, 14(2), 46-58.
Chaijaroenwatana, B., & Renumas, M. (2017). Peaceful methods: Conflict management according to peaceful methods. MCU Peace Studies Review Journal, 5(2), 1-16.
Deep South Watch Database. (2023). Summary of Incidents in Southern Thailand. Retrieved 4 December, 2023, from https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/dswdatabase
Dina, A. (2010). Public policy: Education in southern Thailand consistent with community way. Retrieved 20 November 2022 from http://thaingo.org/thaingo/node/1902
Dongnadeng, H. A., Kajornbun, S., Chaijaroenwatana, B., & Poonsub, A. (2023b). The Roles of the Southern Border Provinces Administrative Center (SBPAC) in the Development of the Conflict Area from the Perspectives of Civil Society Organizations. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 14(1), 55–86.
Dongnadeng, H. A., Bunchoo, C., & Makthong, P. (2023a). Conditions and Needs of the People in Development of Border Areas: A Case Study of Taba market, Takbai District, Narathiwat Province. Local Administration Journal, 16(4), 505-522.
Human Rights Watch. (2010). Targets of both sides violence against students, teachers, and schools in Thailand’s southern border provinces (HRW Report). Retrieved June 20, 2022, from http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/thailand0910sum_web.pdf
Imvitaya, T. (2020). Government big data utilization for increasing public service performance: A study case of Linkage Center the Central Register Office, Department of Provincial Administration. Master thesis, Chulalongkorn University.
Kariji, K. (2018). Collaborative governance in industrial projects for sustainable job creation in Thailand’s three Southern Border Provinces. Master of Public Administration Thesis, National Institute of Development Administration.
Kwanmanit, C. (2017). A study of land transport network in Songkhla Special Economic Zone: A case study of Hatyai-Sadao Motorway. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(1), 169-189.
McCargo, D. (2014). Southern Thailand: From conflict to negotiations?. Sydney: The Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Monkongpitukkul, S., Thamrongthanyawong, S., Sahapattana, P., & Jitpiromsri, S. (2016). Conflict resolution in the 3 southern border provinces of Thailand: Policy process and outcomes. Al-Hikmah Journal, 6(12), 35-53.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Saensira, W. (2010). Differences in power according to martial law act, public administration in emergency situations act, and the internal security maintenance of the kingdom act. Chulniti, 7(3), May-June 2010.
Southern Border Provinces Administrative Centre. (2022) Action plan to enhance development in the provinces southern border 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2023, from https://www.sbpac.go.th/?page_id=34190
Southern Border Provinces Administrative Centre. (2023). About SBPAC. Retrieved on 20 September 2023, from https://www.sbpac.go.th
Srichai, C. (2018). Problem solving guidelines in three southern border province area of Thailand. The Golden Teak: Humanity and Social Science Journal, 24(Special), 1-11.
Sriwichain, K., Tonboot, S., & Pannarunothai, S. (2021). Knowledge synthesis and situations of public policy driving in an issue of health rights of vulnerable groups. Journal of Social Work, 29(1), 177-209.
Tanod. P., Holumyong, T., Pakdeejit, R., & Meenongwah, S., (2022). Fostering reconciliation and solving the conflict crisis in the three southern border provinces. Journal of Academic for Public and Private Management, 4(3), 121-135.
The Strategic Development Plan for the Southern Border Provinces B.E. 2563-2565. (n.d.) Retrieved 25 September 2021, from https://www.isoc5.net/files/
The Strategy for the Security of the Southern Border Provinces B.E. 2560-2564. (n.d.). Retrieved 25 September 2021, from https://isoc5.net/infographics/view/783/
Watthanapradith, K. (2024). Pixel Krungkaow: Mechanism for social empowerment to develop a happy multicultural city. Journal of Interdisciplinary Buddhism, 2(1), 1-19.