PRE-ANALYSIS OF THE 4th EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT ON CHILD CENTER LEARNING MANAGEMENT

ผู้แต่ง

  • Chaiwat Waree Faculty of Education Thepsatri Rajabhat University, Thailand
  • Suwattana Sanguanrat Faculty of Education Thepsatri Rajabhat University, Thailand

คำสำคัญ:

Educational Quality Assessment, Learning Management, Child Center

บทคัดย่อ

This research is a qualitative study originating from the educational quality assurance according to the National Education Act, B.E. 2542 (1999) Article 47, which mandates "a system of educational quality assurance to enhance the quality and standards of basic education and higher education, comprising internal quality assurance systems and external quality assurance systems." School A has conducted internal quality assurance annually. This research gathered data from on-site fieldwork following the review of School A's internal quality assurance. The aim was to examine the actual educational management using observation, interviews, and document analysis, following assessment criteria and indicators in various aspects to verify correctness, appropriateness, feasibility, and usefulness. This research has chosen to discuss and disseminate the findings regarding ability in organizing student-centered learning. This research is a qualitative research conducted by conducting field survey for 3 days. The objective of this research is to conduct the 4th Educational Quality Assessment on Child Center Learning Management: Case Study of a School. The populations consisted of 19 teachers of A School in basic education level. The target group consisted of 5 teachers obtained from voluntariness to receive instructional supervision. Methods for analyzing data are percentages and content analysis. The results of assessment revealed that the strength was application of local songs and Lamtad to support project-based learning in learning area of science and learning community under the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy. The issue requiring development was that some teachers still establish instructional plans that are not child center learning and they were not based on the same standard without consecutive and systematical project result assessment as defined by PDCA (P=Plan, D=Do, C=Check, A=Action) Cycle. Suggestions were that all teachers should establish instructional plans emphasizing on child center learning plan under the same standard format with consecutive and systematical  

References

Waree, C. (2019). “Application of Quality Function Deployment for the Environment in Service Education: A Case Study of SSRU by Google Forms.” ICETC 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, (10), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369255.3369261, 2019.

Department of Academic Affairs, (2002). Education Quality Assurance Guidelines. Bangkok: Department.

Wasi, P. (2001). Intellectual Strategy and Education Reform, Bangkok: Wattana Panich.

Thaweesuksathien, R. (2014). Situation Problems in Implementing Educational Quality Assurance in Schools Khu Mueang School Group 1 under the Office of Buriram Primary Educational Service Area 4, Buriram: Buriram Rajabhat University.

Chimmalee, S. (2014). Internal Quality Assurance in Basic Education Schools Under the Office of Buriram Primary Educational Service Area 4, Buriram: Buriram Rajabhat University.

Boonjiam, W. (2005). Factors affecting the utilization of external evaluation results for quality development of basic education institutions. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Muangchan, W. (2000). Vision of Educational Administrators. Bangkok: Pimluck.

Sripoka, W. & Rattanawijit, P. (2001). From principles to external quality assessment guidelines in accordance with national education standards. Bangkok: Thammasat Printing House.

Downloads

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2024-04-30