AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS CORRELATED WITH POLITICAL CONFLICT DE-ESCALATION AND PUBLIC TRUST: BUILDING COMMUNITY RESILIENCE IN DIN DAENG DISTRICT, BANGKOK

Main Article Content

Orrachun Petcharat
Sudabhorn Khitkhulnamchai

Abstract

This research article aimed to: 1) examine the levels of public perception of hate speech and digital literacy through social media; 2) investigate the levels of political conflict reduction and community trust building; and 3) analyze the relationships between the perception of hate speech, digital literacy, political conflict reduction, and community trust building among residents of Din Daeng District. This study employed a quantitative research design. The sample consisted of 400 residents of Din Daeng District aged 18 years and over who regularly used social media, selected through purposive sampling. The research instrument was a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient. The findings revealed that: 1) respondents demonstrated high levels of perception of hate speech on social media and digital literacy, indicating their ability to recognize content that may contribute to political conflict and to use digital media appropriately; 2) political conflict reduction and community trust building were also at high levels, with respondents placing importance on respecting differing opinions and coexisting peacefully despite political differences; and 3) the perception of hate speech and digital literacy were positively correlated at a low level with political conflict reduction and community trust building, with statistical significance. These findings suggest that both factors contribute to promoting social harmony and community trust, although the results differed from the initial hypothesis, which predicted a negative relationship

Article Details

How to Cite
Petcharat, O., & Khitkhulnamchai, S. (2026). AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS CORRELATED WITH POLITICAL CONFLICT DE-ESCALATION AND PUBLIC TRUST: BUILDING COMMUNITY RESILIENCE IN DIN DAENG DISTRICT, BANGKOK. Journal of Social Science Development, 9(8), 15–24. retrieved from https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSSD/article/view/11651
Section
Research Articles

References

Askew, M. (2010). Bangkok: Place, practice and representation. London: Routledge.

Benkler, Y. et al. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. London: SAGE Publications.

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York, NY: Wiley Computer Publishing.

Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426.

Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1-55.

Loader, B. D. & Mercea, D. . (2011). Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757-769.

Mihailidis, P. & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in "post-fact" society. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 441-454.

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078.

OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

UNESCO. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. Montreal, QC: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

__________. (2021). Addressing hate speech through education: Recommendations for policy-makers. Paris: UNESCO.

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis. (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.