THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHERS’ INNOVATIVE CHARACTERISTICS IN SCHOOLS UNDER SISAKET PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE 4
Keywords:
Teacher Innovativeness, Development of Innovative Characteristics, Sisaket Primary Educational Service Area Office 4Abstract
The objectives of this research were 1) to study the innovative characteristics of teachers in educational institutions under the Office of the Primary Educational Service Area, Sisaket Area 4, and 2) to study the development of innovative characteristics of teachers in educational institutions leading to teaching innovations that can solve immediate problems of small schools under the Office of the Primary Educational Service Area, Sisaket Area 4. The sample consisted of 322 teachers under the organization, selected by stratified random sampling according to the proportion of school size. The research instrument was a questionnaire with a reliability value of 0.97. The statistics used for data analysis included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis.
The research results found that 1) the results of the study of innovative characteristics of teachers in educational institutions of the Office of the Primary Educational Service Area, Sisaket Area 4 found that overall, it was at a high level (Xˉ=4.30, S.D.=.45). When considering each aspect, it was found that determination to success had the highest mean at the very level (Xˉ=4.55). In contrast, acceptance of change had the lowest mean at the very level (Xˉ=4.16). 2) the results of the study of the development of innovative characteristics of teachers in educational institutions leading to teaching innovations that can solve immediate problems of small schools, Office of the Primary Educational Service Area, Sisaket Area 4, found that there were 6 aspects including 1) courage, 2) tolerance for ambiguity, 3) determination to success, 4) self-awareness, 5) acceptance of change, and 6) interest in problem solving.
References
กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2565). แผนพัฒนาการศึกษาแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 13 (พ.ศ. 2566-2570). กรุงเทพมหานคร: กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
จิรายุทธิ์ อ่อนศรี. (2560). การพัฒนาทักษะด้านเทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศและการสื่อสารของครูในยุคดิจิทัล. วารสารการศึกษาและการพัฒนาสังคม, 13(2), 45-58.
ถนอมพร เลาหจรัสแสง. (2556). บทบาทครูไทยในศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2560). การวิจัยเบื้องต้น. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สุวีริยาสาส์น.
สำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาศรีสะเกษ เขต 4. (2567). รายงานสถิติการศึกษา ปีการศึกษา 2567. ศรีสะเกษ:สำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาศรีสะเกษ เขต 4.
สุรศักดิ์ ปาเฮ. (2560). การจัดการศึกษาในยุคโลกาภิวัตน์: ความท้าทายและโอกาส. วารสารวิชาการศึกษาศาสตร์, 18(1), 12-25.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2009). Teacher emotions: Well being and effectiveness. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 15-31). Springer.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers
College Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Han, J., & Williams, J. (2019). Teacher resilience and innovation adoption: Overcoming the tension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.003
Harvard Business Review Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hurmerinta, L., & Zettinig, P. (2013). Entrepreneurial characteristics and the perception of uncertainty. In M.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sandberg, S. (2013). Emerging market entry node pattern and experiential knowledge of small and medium-sized enterprises. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 106-129. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331311314547
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. Scribner.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255
