มุมมองของผู้ปฏิบัติงานในกระบวนการยุติธรรมต่อคุณลักษณะเชิงบริบทและองค์ประกอบของเครื่องมือประเมินความเสี่ยงด้านความรุนแรงในเด็กและวัยรุ่น

Piyapong Saetang; Manika  Wisessathorn; Ujsara  Prasertsin

Authors

Piyapong Saetang Assistant Professor Dr., Faculty of Education, Ramkhamhaeng University
Manika Wisessathorn Associate Professor Dr., Faculty of Education, Ramkhamhaeng University
Ujsara Prasertsin Associate Professor Dr., Faculty of Education, North Bangkok University

Keywords:

Instrument, Violence Risk Assessment, Children and Adolescents

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the contextual characteristics and components of the violence risk assessment instrument for children and adolescence that aligns with the justice system professionals’ perspectives. A phenomenology qualitative research approach was employed, using the snowball technique for in-depth interviews with five key informants experienced in working with juvenile violence behaviors for at least five years were required to comply with the inclusion requirements. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings were categorized into five core themes: (1) Definition of violence; (2) Situation of using the violence risk assessment; (3) The importance and necessity of using instrument to screening and treatment for violence behavior; (4) The characteristics of the instrument that align with justice system professionals’ contextual needs; and (5) The components of violence. The results of
this study provide guidelines for developing a scale with characteristics and components that comply with practitioners and align with the Thai social context, facilitating practical application,
especially in the fields of psychology in criminal justice system.

References

กัญญ์ฐิตา ศรีภา. (2562). จิตวิทยาอาชญากรรม การวิเคราะห์พฤติกรรมอาชญากรรม ความผิดปกติทางจิต และการฆาตกรรม. ภูมิการพิมพ์

กรมพินิจและคุ้มครองเด็กและเยาวชน. (ม.ป.ป.). รายงานสถิติคดีประจำปี 2567. https://www.djop.go.th/storage/files/2/สถิติประจำปี/stat-2567.pdf

คณะกรรมการวิชาชีพสาขาจิตวิทยาคลินิก. (2557). มาตรฐานการประกอบโรคศิลปะสาขาจิตวิทยาคลินิก. บริษัทอาร์ตคลอลิไฟท์จํากัด.

วัลลี ธรรมโกสิทธิ์. (2550). ความตรงของแบบประเมินความเสี่ยงต่อการเกิดความรุนแรง: HCR-20. วารสารสุขภาพจิตแห่งประเทศไทย, 15(2), 101-109.

หวาน ศรีเรือนทอง, ธรณินทร์ กองสุข, สุพัตรา สุขาวห, ทรงพล โลดทนงค์, และจินตนา ลี้จงเพิ่มพูน. (2559).

การพัฒนาแบบประเมินระดับความรุนแรงของพฤติกรรมก่อความรุนแรงในผู้ป่วยจิตเวชที่มีอาการรุนแรง. วารสารสมาคมจิตแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย, 60(3), 253-266.

Beck, A. T., & Pretzer, J. (2005). A Cognitive Perspective on Hate and Violence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 67–85). American Psychological Association.

Blair, R. J. R. (2018). Traits of empathy and anger: implications for psychopathy and other disorders associated with aggression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), 20170155.

Chereji, S. V., Pintea, S., & David, D. (2012). The relationship of anger and cognitive distortions with violence in violent offenders’ population: A meta-analysis review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 4(1), 59.

de Vogel, V., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2016). Adapting risk assessment tools to new jurisdictions.

In Singh, J.P., Bjørkly, S. & Fazel (eds). International perspectives on violence risk assessment, pp.26-39. Oxford University Press.

Hamby, S. (2017). On defining violence, and why it matters [Editorial]. Psychology of Violence, 7(2), 167–180.

Hardin, K. M., Contreras, I. M., Kosiak, K., & Novaco, R. W. (2022). Anger rumination and imagined violence as related to violent behavior before and after psychiatric hospitalization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(9), 1878-1895.

Heleniak, C., Bolden, C. R., McCabe, C. J., Lambert, H. K., Rosen, M. L., King, K. M., Monahan,

K. C., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2021). Distress Tolerance as a Mechanism Linking Violence Exposure to Problematic Alcohol use in Adolescence. Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 49(9), 1211–1225.

Helfritz-Sinville, L. E., & Stanford, M. S. (2014). Hostile attribution bias in impulsive and premeditated aggression. Personality and individual differences, 56, 45-50.

Howitt, D. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods in psychology. Pearson UK.

Katembu, S., Zahedi, A., & Sommer, W. (2023). Childhood trauma and violent behavior in adolescents are differentially related to cognitive-emotional deficits. Frontiers in

public health, 11, 1001132.

Lee, B. X., Donnelly, P. D., Cohen, L., & Garg, S. (2016). Violence, health, and the 2030 agenda: merging evidence and implementation. Journal of public health policy, 37, 1-12.

Nakcharoen, U., Yunibhand, J., & Chaiyawat, W. (2012). The Thai Violence Risk Scale (TVRS) persons with schizophrenia: Development and initial validation. Chulalongkorn Medical Journal, 56(6), 699-718.

Neller, D. J., & Fabian, J. M. (2006). Trauma and its contribution to violent behaviour.

Criminal Justice Matters, 66(1), 6-7.

Rodriguez, C. M., Russa, M. B., & Kircher, J. C. (2015). Analog assessment of frustration tolerance: Association with self-reported child abuse risk and physiological reactivity. Child abuse & neglect, 46, 121-131.

Sanmontree, W., & Wongupparaj, P. (2023). The Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability Scale: Reliability and Validity in a Thai Forensic Psychiatric Inpatient Setting. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 18(1), 84-99.

Santos, K. D. S., Ribeiro, M. C., Queiroga, D. E. U. D., Silva, I. A. P. D., & Ferreira, S. M. S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciencia & saude coletiva, 25, 655-664. doi:10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018

Sheldon, K. & Howells, K. (2017). Assessment of Violence and Homicide. In. Browne, K.D., Beech, A.R., Craig, L.A. & Chou, S. (Eds). Assessments in Forensic Practice. (pp.28-51). John Wiley & Sons.

Sturmey, P., & Lindsay, W. R. (2017). Case formulation and risk assessment. Assessments. In. Browne, K.D., Beech, A.R., Craig, L.A. & Chou, S. (Eds). Assessments in Forensic Practice. (pp.5-27). John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, Y., Cao, S., Dong, Y., & Xia, L. X. (2019). Hostile attribution bias and angry rumination:

A longitudinal study of undergraduate students. Plos one, 14(5), e0217759.

World Health Organization. (2021). Injuries and violence. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/injuries-and-violence

World Health Organization. (2020). Youth violence. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/youth-violence