THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETENCY-BASED CURRICULUM IN BASIC EDUCATION IN THAILAND AND INTERNATIONAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article employs a Documentary Research methodology to conduct a comparative analysis of the development trends of the Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) in basic education across Thailand and selected international jurisdictions. The study systematically gathered and analyzed secondary data from academic literature, policy reports, national core curricula, and published research from both Thailand and successful CBC implementers globally. The collected data were subjected to qualitative content analysis and categorization to identify similarities, differences, and convergent trends across five critical dimensions: 1) National Policy, 2) Curriculum Structure, 3) Teacher Professional Development, 4) Assessment Systems, and 5) Local Context Integration. The analysis reveals that educationally advanced nations prioritize participatory policy formulation, design flexible, learner-centric curricula, maintain robust systems for continuous teacher professionalization, utilize diversified competency-based assessment, and effectively integrate the curriculum with local communities and cultural contexts. In contrast, Thailand and several ASEAN counterparts grapple with significant challenges, notably the policy-practice gap, the insufficient preparedness of educators for competency-based pedagogy, and an assessment focus skewed toward achievement scores over authentic learner capabilities. The primary global challenge identified is the implementation gap and the need for rigorous institutional support. This paper concludes by presenting policy recommendations derived from the comparative findings, advocating for strengthening the transition to a CBC system in Thailand through an integrated and systemic development approach that ensures concrete and sustainable linkage across all educational components
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. (2564). กรอบแนวคิดหลักสูตรฐานสมรรถนะระดับการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. กรุงเทพมหานคร: กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
Halinen, I. (2021). Curriculum reform in Finland: A new approach to competence development. European Journal of Education, 56(1), 56-68.
MEXT Japan. (2021). National curriculum standards (Course of study). Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
Saloviita, T. (2021). Teacher education in Finland: Structure and content. International Review of Education, 67(3), 349-366.
St. John, M., Tong, B., Li, E., & Wilbur, K. (2020). Competency-based education frameworks across Canadian health professions and implications for multisource feedback. Journal of Allied Health, 49(1), 1E-11E.
Tainio et al. (2022). Phenomenon-based learning in Finnish education: Implementation and challenges. Education Inquiry, 13(1), 73-89.
Tan, C. Y., Goh, J., & Chua, B. (2023). Competency-based education in Singapore: From policy to practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 1-15.
Tan, C., & Wong, Y. (2022). Competency-Based Education in Asia: Rethinking Assessment and Accountability. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(1), 1-12.
UNESCO Bangkok. (2022). Competency-based learning in Asia: Policy trends and good practices. Bangkok: UNESCO Office Bangkok.
Vainikainen, M. P., & Hautamäki, J. (2020). Assessment in Finnish comprehensive education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 897-914.