School Administration of Directors in the VUCA World under Buriram Primary Educational Service Area Office 2 School Administration of Directors in the VUCA World under Buriram Primary Educational Service Area Office 2

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the current conditions of school administration in the disruptive era as perceived by school administrators, development guidelines for school administration in the disruptive era of school administrators, and evaluate these guidelines for school administration in the Buriram Primary Educational Service Area Office 2 during the disruptive era. The study was conducted in three phases. Phase 1 investigated the current conditions of school administration in the disruptive era. The sample consisted of 338 school administrators and teachers. A five-point Likert-scale questionnaire was employed as the research instrument, with an index of item-objective congruence ranging from 0.80 to 1.00, a reliability coefficient of 0.98, and item discrimination indices ranging from 0.33 to 0.92. Phase 2 focused on formulating development guidelines for school administration in the disruptive era. The target group comprised five experts who participated in in-depth interviews. Phase 3 involved evaluating the proposed development guidelines. The target group included 30 school administrators and teachers, and a five-point Likert-scale assessment form was used to measure the suitability and feasibility of the guidelines.

          The results revealed the following: The overall current conditions of school administration in the disruptive era, as perceived by school administrators and teachers, were rated at a high level. The development guidelines for school administration in the disruptive era covered four key aspects: acceptance of change, visionary administration, technological adaptation, and strategic planning, resulting in a total of 40 proposed guidelines. The evaluation of the proposed development guidelines for school administration in the disruptive era indicated that their overall suitability was rated at the highest level and their overall feasibility was likewise rated at the highest level.