Effect of Expiration of Initial Public Offerings Silent Period on Returns in The Stock Exchange Thailand
Keywords:
Strategy Shareholders, Public Information, Silent Period, lockup period, Abnormal Return, Cumulative abnormal returnsAbstract
The study of the effects on the rate of return around the expiration of the initial public offering (IPO) lockup agreement period in each industry in Thailand provides important information that recognized information during lockup agreement period. This study was aimed to investigate the information asymmetries during lockup agreement period. The study was analyzed by event study methodology to tested average abnormal returns (AAR) and cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR). The estimation period was divided to two events based on rule. The first event allows strategic shareholders to sell 25% of common stock under the IPO lockup agreement. The final event that shareholders allowed to sell all of common stock under conditions. The analysis was based on data from 433 companies listed between 2003 and June 30 2021 on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the Market for Alternative Investment (MAI). The findings revealed that investors had better access to information in the final event than the first event. Small companies MAI had more gaps in recognized information than large companies on SET. In conclusion, the study provides consistent with the hypothesis of efficient markets during the lockup agreement period, but inefficiencies are still evident in some sectors. Especially technology sector and industrial sector listed on SET and the agriculture and food sector in MAI have shown inefficiency in both events. Moreover, negative return rates across all industry sector on the SET. However, the study doesn’t find statistically significant changes impacting forecasts but except for positive findings in the property and construction sector. Overall, while the market shows efficiency, specific sectors reveal inefficiencies due to information asymmetry, influencing investment decisions.
References
Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159-78.
Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting Long-run Abnormal Stock Return: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3), 341-372.
Bradley, D. J., Jordan, B. D., Rotan, I., & Yi, H. (2001). Venture Capital and IPO Lockup Expiration: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Research, 24(4), 465-492.
Brau, J. C., Carter, D. A., Christophe, S. E., & Key, K. G. (2004). Market Reaction to The Expiration of IPO Lockup Provisions. Managerial Finance, 30(1), 75-91.
Brav, A., & Gompers, P. A. (2003). The Role of Lockups in Initial Public Offerings. Review of Financial Studies, 16(1), 1-29.
Brown, J., & Warner, B. (1985). Using Daily Stock Return: The Case of Event Studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31.
Chakpaisan, P. (2012). Stock Reaction to the expiration of silent period evidence from the stock exchange of Thailand (Independent study, Thammasat University). Retrieved January 22, 2024, from https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:110136
Disara, S. (2007). Stock Reaction to the Expiration of IPO Lockup Period: Evidence in Thailand (Master thesis, Thammasat University). Retrieved January 22, 2024, from https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:125556
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Market: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 28-30.
Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969). The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information. International Economic Review, 10(1), 1-21.
Field, L. C., & Hanka, G. (2001). The Expiration of IPO Share Lockups. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 471-500.
Haggard, K. S., & Xi, Y. (2017). IPO Overvaluation and Returns Prior to Lockup Expiration. Managerial Finance, 43(12), 1392-1410.
Hakim, T. (2010). IPO Lockup Expiration in the Middle East and North Africa Region (Master thesis, Concordia University). Retrieved January 22, 2024, from https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/979199/
Hirshleifer, J. (1970). Investment, Interest, and Capital. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Ofek, E., & Richardson, M. (2000). The IPO Lock-up Period: Implications for Market Efficiency and Downward Sloping Demand Curves (Stern School of Business, New York University Working Papers 99-054). New York: New York University.
Sum, M. Y. (2009). Information Flow and Trading Dynamics: A Theoretical Approach. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 7(4), 33-50.
Tabtieng, N. (2020). A Survey of Capital Reduction to Compensate the Deficitin Retained Earnings and its Impact on Financial Statements of Listed Companies in Thailand. NIDA Business Journal, 27, 28–59.
Talans, L., & Minardi, A. M. A. F. (2020). Behavior of Stock Prices due to the Lock-up Period Expiration in IPOs and Follow-ons. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 32(86), 331-344.
Zameni, A., & Yong, O. (2017). Substantial Shareholders and Their Trading Behaviour around Lock-Up Expiry: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Capital Markets Review, 25(1), 1-18.
Zhou, L. (2017). The Empirical study on the Relationship of IPO Lockup, Earnings Management and Venture Capital. Modern Economy, 8, 1082-1097.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Innovative Business Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสาร..... depend on policy