DIGITAL INNOVATOR TO COMMUNITY” LEARNING ENVIRONMENT THROUGH PLACE-BASED COMMUNITY LEARNING AND DIGITAL PROJECT-BASED LEARNING TO DEVELOP DIGITAL INNOVATOR COMPETENCIES FOR UPPER SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
Keywords:
Learning Environment, Digital Innovator Competency, Place-Based Community Learning, Digital Project-Based Learning, IDEATE ModelAbstract
This research aimed to design, develop, and evaluate the effectiveness of the "Digital Innovator to Community" learning environment through place-based community learning and digital project-based learning to develop digital innovator competencies for upper secondary school students. This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) methodology conducted across four phases. The research sample consisted of 30 upper secondary school students from Sakolrajwittayanukul School, Sakon Nakhon Province, during the second semester of the 2023 academic year, selected through cluster random sampling. A One Group Pretest–Posttest Design was employed. Research instruments comprised the learning environment based on a 6–step IDEATE Model with 20 lesson plans across 5 learning units, a digital innovator competency assessment, and a learning achievement test. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, E1/E2 efficiency index, and paired samples t–test.
The findings revealed that the conceptual framework of the learning environment was evaluated by experts at the highest level of appropriateness ( = 4.72). The learning environment met the 80/80 efficiency criterion with an E1/E2 value of 85.42/87.83. All six dimensions of digital innovator competency and all four domains of learning achievement were significantly higher after instruction than before at the .05 level (t = 17.896 and t = 15.684, respectively), with very large effect sizes across all components (Cohen's d ≥ 3.81). Furthermore, students' community digital innovation projects received 28 awards from 5 competitive platforms across 4 countries.
References
ชัยยงค์ พรหมวงศ์. (2556). การทดสอบประสิทธิภาพสื่อหรือชุดการสอน. วารสารศิลปากร ศึกษาศาสตร์วิจัย, 5(1), 7–20.
โรงเรียนสกลราชวิทยานุกูล. (2564). รายงานการประเมินตนเองของสถานศึกษา (SAR) ประจำปีการศึกษา 2564. โรงเรียนสกลราชวิทยานุกูล.
สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี. (2562). ผลการประเมิน PISA 2018: บทสรุปสำหรับผู้บริหาร. สถาบันส่งเสริมการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. (2560). หลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้น พื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551 (ฉบับปรับปรุง พ.ศ. 2560). กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560–2579. สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา.
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and 'making' in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 203–222). Transcript Publishers.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Bower, M. (2017). Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice. Emerald Publishing.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press.
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/388
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-
Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Marra, R. M., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018
Lackéus, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. OECD Publishing.
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Morel, R. P., Coburn, C., Catterson, A. K., & Higgs, J. (2024). The multiple dimensions of scale: Implications for research and practice. Educational Researcher, 53(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231216785
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Stoecker, R. (2016). Liberating service learning and the rest of higher education civic engagement. Temple University Press.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2023). The effect of digital project-based learning on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 38, 100509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100509
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
