USING LIFE IMPRISONMENT INSTEAD OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN THAILAND
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to study the life imprisonment, as the punishment in lieu of the execution in Thailand. The objectives of the research are to study and analyze 1). The enforcement of the life imprisonment instead of the death penalty in Thailand 2). The opinions regarding the abovementioned substitution 3). The proposal of the fundamental substance of the bill regarding the aforesaid replacement in Thailand. At the present, there are 106 countries around the globe which have abolished the death sentence from the laws, 28 nations have eliminated such punishment in practice but have not yet abrogate the laws. There are 56 states which still practice the execution. Thailand is currently in the last classification. Moreover, there are myriad campaigns around the world, calling for the abolishment of the death penalty and demanding all of the countries to be bound by the International Covenant on the Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), in order to eliminate the death sentence (Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, aiming at the abolition of death penalty).
According to the study, the death penalty prescribed in the Criminal Code violates the principle of human dignity which is the universal principle recognized by various nations, and protected under article 4 of the Constitution of Thailand B.E. 2560, states that “Human dignity, rights, liberties and equality of the people shall be protected”. Moreover, such punishment is also against the principles of human rights and the rule of law. Therefore, this research proposes that the life imprisonment should be imposed as the substitute for the capital punishment in Thai Criminal Code, in order to create the new norm of the society permanently, in accordance with the principles regarding the human dignity, the human rights, and the rule of law.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
คณิต ณ นคร. (2563). กฎหมายอาญาภาคทั่วไป. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 7). กรุงเทพมหานคร: วิญญูชน.
สมศรี หาญอนันทสุข. (2563). We can live without the death penalty. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 14 มกราคม 2564 จาก Amnesty International Thailand: Bangkok: www.amnesty.or.th/latest/blog/828
หยุด แสงอุทัย. (2537). กฎหมายอาญา ภาค 1. กรุงเทพมหานคร: (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 16). สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.
Amnesty. (2564). Amnesty International Thailand. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 10 มกราคม 2564 จาก www.Amnesty.or.th/latest/blog/828
Basic Law. (2010). Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. Berin Germany: Deutcher Bundestag.
Claus Roxin. (2006). Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil Band. 4 Auflage. München, Germany: Verlag C.H.Beck.
George P. Fletcher. (1998). Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. USA: Oxford.
Hans-Heinrich Jescheck. (1988). Lehrbuch des Strafrechts: Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin Germany: 4 Auflage Berlin.
Volker Epping. (2014). Grundrechte. 6 Auflage. Springer Germany: Hannover.