NO-FAULT COMPENSATION IN THE MEDICAL CARE SECTOR
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this article was to investigate a study of guidelines for developing laws to help people affected by receiving medical services appropriately based on Swedish guidelines. At present, compensation for damage from receiving medical assistance in Thailand is in the form of proof of guilt and then proving the damage according to the infringement law of the Civil and Commercial Code. Patients who have suffered injury affect their lives in various fields that require compensation for damages legally guaranteed under the Civil and Commercial Code. Must go to court and cause litigation How wrong must the doctor be proved? It is difficult to judge a physician's lack of care in the medical profession because it is a complex matter that has multiple consequences. Most of the victims did not receive prompt treatment. They may have to wait until the result of the Supreme Court Providing compensation for damages without proving guilt before giving the injured person medical assistance to resolve their trouble quickly. And professionals don't have to worry about lengthy proof of guilt. In addition, the termination of litigation in the statute is a limitation of rights under the constitution, which must be enacted as a law For damages to be compensated only in the event of damage that can be avoided or prevented according to the Swedish model. It is insurance for the damage caused by receiving public health services, a concept of the welfare state. Compensation for damages from unproven health services is a solution to the problem of compensation for injuries and medical litigation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
พระราชบัญญัติหลักประกันสุขภาพแห่งชาติ. (2545). ใน ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่มที่ 119 ตอนที่ 116 ก ลงวันที่ 18 พฤศจิกายน 2545 (หน้า 1). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์คณะรัฐมนตรีและราชกิจจานุเบกษา.
Adelman and Westerlund. (2004). The Swedish Patient Compensation System: A Viable Alternative to the U.S. Tort System. Bulletin of The American College of Surgeons, pp. 89(1), 25-30.
Dute J. Faure, G.M., & Koziol, H. (2004). Comparative No-Fault Compensation in the Health Care Sector: Comparative Reports and Conclusions. Austria: Tort and Insurance Law.
Espersson. (2000). The Patient Injury Act: A Comment by Carl Espersson. The Swedish Patient Insurance Association, pp. 1-9.
Glenngård, A.H. et al. (2005). Health systems in transition. World Health Organization 2005, pp. xiii-3.
Hoffman, S. Z. (2009). No-Fault Solutions to the Problem of Medical Injuries: A Focus on Sweden as a Model. Annals of Health Law Advance Directive, 18, 73-93.
National Social Insurance Office. (2003). Social Insurance; General Information about Social Insurance (brochure). Retrieved from Social Insurance in Cyprus: http://www.mlsi.gov.cy/mlsi/sid/sidv2.nsf/All/CFC7F0DD3FCB4E94C2257A170036EE4D?OpenDocument
Studdert and Brennan. (2001). No-fault compensation for medical injuries: The prospect for error prevention. JAMA, 286(2), 217-223.
Swedish Institute. (2009). Health Care in Sweden. Retrieved from Si.Svenska institutet: http://www.si.se
The Patient Injury Act 1996. (2002). Medical Malpractice Systems around the Globe: Examples from the US- tort liability system and the Sweden- no fault system Health. USA: The World Bank Group.