ISSUES OF CREDIBILITY IN DIGITAL EVIDENCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Currently, Thailand and other countries worldwide have developed into the digital age, not just for communication. Even the transactions, lifestyle, and work of most people now need electronic devices involved. When making transactions and doing things, it's easier and more convenient, and access to information Collecting and forwarding is much easier and faster. Therefore, it is another channel for criminals to use those channels to commit crimes.
Digital evidence is unique in that it can be easily altered. And that editing can cause damage to various data. Therefore, dealing with digital evidence requires a standardized, universally accepted and reliable process. Digital evidence is unique in that it can be easily altered. And that editing can cause damage to various data. Therefore, dealing with digital evidence requires a standardized, universally accepted and reliable process. In particular, there are technical guidelines for dealing with digital evidence so that digital evidence remains credible and listenable in judicial and judicial processes.
While digital evidence plays a massive role in judicial processes worldwide, it is challenging to build digital evidence's credibility, confidence, and security. When it has to be used in a trial or used in the judicial process of the courts, due to technical issues, expert personnel, and methods for dealing with digital evidence. These are essential problems in building trust in digital evidence because technology evolves day by day or second. It inevitably leads to sometimes making the old or previously practised methods unsuitable for what is new. It is challenging to cope with what is known as unpredictability or the inability to plan.
Learning of digital evidence and the processes involved in digital forensics to gain a deeper understanding, including empowering various aspects of the process of dealing with digital forensics. Therefore, it is essential to develop and create a digital evidence-related method to determine the direction and function that ensures credibility and usability in the judicial process.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bennett D. (2012). The challenges facing computer forensics investigators in obtaining information from mobile devices for use in criminal investigations. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 21(3), 159-168.
CISOMAG. (n.d.). What Is Digital Evidence and Why Is It Important. Retrieved from https://www.firstlegal.com/what-is-digital-forensics-and-why-is-it-important/
Cole K. A. et al. (2015). A review of recent case law related to digital forensics: the current issues. Proceedings of the Conference on Digital Forensics Security and Law, 95-103.
Doyle S. (2019). Quality Management in Forensic Science. California: Academic Press.
Eckelberry A. et al. (2007). Technical review of the trial testimony State of Connecticut vs. Julie Amero. Retrieved from http://dfir.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/julieamerosummary.pdf
Edmond G. (2016). Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 20(1), 3-28.
Harris R. (2006). Arriving at an anti-forensics consensus: examining how to define and control the anti-forensics problem. Digital Investigation, 3, 44-49.
Horsman G. (2019). Formalising investigative decision making in digital forensics: Proposing the Digital Evidence Reporting and Decision Support (DERDS) framework. Digital Investigation, 28, 146–151.
National Forensic Science Technology Center. (2008). A Simplified Guide To Digital Evidence. Retrieved from http://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/digital/DigitalEvidence.pdf