21st Century Educational Administration Strategy under the New Public Governance Paradigm for Preserving and Maintaining the Community Arts and Culture
Abstract
This research aims to analyze strategic approaches to educational governance under the New Public Governance model. This study examines documentary research, analyzes and synthesizes, and presents the results in accordance with the study objectives. The study results reveal that educational governance in the 21st century under the New Public Governance (NPG) framework focuses on decentralization, stakeholder participation, and technology in governance to achieve effective, transparent, and sustainable governance. The participation of teachers, students, parents, and communities in decision-making helps create a sense of shared ownership and responsibility. In addition, using digital platforms, data analytics, and online communication tools can enhance management efficiency and informed decision-making. At the same time, successful educational governance must also take into account sustainability, equity, and student well-being. Schools should collaborate with external organizations and adopt best practices. In addition, case studies from countries such as Finland, New Zealand, and Singapore show that decentralization, the use of technology, and community participation are key to improving the quality of education. However, transitioning to a new governance model faces several obstacles, including resistance to the old system, resource constraints, and ethical concerns. Therefore, policy development, leadership development, and strategic use of technology are essential to create a modern and sustainable education system. In conclusion, educational administration in the 21st century under the concept of New Governance (NPG) emphasizes decentralization, stakeholder participation, and the use of technology to increase the efficiency, transparency, and sustainability of the education system. While good governance faces challenges such as resource constraints and resistance from the old system, policy development and strategic use of technology are essential to create an effective and inclusive system. In addition, applying New Public Governance strategies in educational administration fosters inclusive and sustainable cultural preservation. These efforts ensure that community arts and heritage thrive for future generations
Downloads
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Research Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arts and Culture Journal of the Lower Moon River

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles, content, and information which published in the Arts and Culture Journal of the Lower Moon River are the attitude, opinions, and responsibilities of the article's author. The editorial board do not necessarily to agree and do not responsible for that article.
All articles published open access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to articles with free of charge. It's allow to access without having to ask permission in advance from the publisher or author and the original publication must be properly and appropriately citation.
The owner (The Office of Arts and Culture, Surindra Rajabhat University) reserves the right to require changes to the contribution, including changes to the length of the contribution, as a condition of acceptance. The owner reserves the right, notwithstanding acceptance, not to publish the contribution if for any reason such publication would in the reasonable judgment of the owner, result in legal liability or violation of journal ethical practices. If the owner decides not to publish the contribution, the article processing charges (APC) are non-refundable. After the official rejection, the contributor is free to submit the contribution to any other journal from any other publisher.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
Ball, S. J. (2017). The Education Debate (3rd ed.). Policy Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1t893tk.
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School Leadership Models: What Do We Know?. School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680.
Cohen-Cruz, J. (2010). Engaging Performance: Theatre as Call and Response. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847695.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.
Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, Family, and Community Partnerships Preparing Educators and Improving Schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a Culture of Change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Galloway, M. K., & Ishimaru, A. M. (2017). Equitable Leadership on the Ground: Converging on High-Leverage Practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 2. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2205.
Goldbard, A. (2006). New Creative Community: The Art of Cultural Development. New Village Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21pxmht.
Hájek, O., Novosák, J., & Bednář, P. (2011). Local Agenda 21 and Culture: Lessons from the Czech Republic. Culture and Local Governance, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.18192/clg-cgl.v3i1.187.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. Teachers College Press.
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed Leadership: Friend or Foe?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635.
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID 19 - School Leadership in Disruptive Times. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479.
Harris, J., Carrington, S., & Ainscow, M. (2017). Promoting Equity in Schools Collaboration, Inquiry and Ethical Leadership. Routledge & CRC Press.
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
IMLS. (n.d.). Learn About IMLS. https://www.imls.gov/about/learn-about-imls.
Kirkland, K., & Sutch, D. (2009). Overcoming the Barriers to Educational Technology. Futurelab.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Schumacker, R. (2020). How School Leadership Influences Student Learning: A Test of “The Four Paths Model.” Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772.
Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010). Creative Placemaking. https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/CreativePlacemaking-Paper.pdf.
Mental Health Action Guide. (2024). Promoting Mental Health and Well-Being in Schools. https://www.cdc.gov/mental-health-action-guide/about/index.html.
Mulcahy, D. (2006). The Salience of Space for Pedagogy and Identity in Teacher Education: Problem‐based Learning as a Case in Point. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 14(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360500487827.
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance?. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022.
Osborne, S. P. (2009). The New Public Governance?. Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Routledge.
Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, D. J. (2017). Creating Research Practice Partnerships in Education. Harvard Education Press.
Pierre, J. (2000). Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295143.001.0001.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?. Teachers College Press.
Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Routledge.
Spring, J. (2008). Globalization of Education: An Introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203886854.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable Education: Revisioning Learning and Change. Schumacher Society/Green Books.
TCCE. (n.d.). About Us. The Culture Capital Exchange. https://tcce.co.uk/about-us.
The New York Community Trust. (n.d.). Arts, Culture & Historic Preservation New York City. https://thenytrust.org/grant-funding/arts-culture-historic-preservation-nyc.
Topping, K. J., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), e3353. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353.
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive Governance Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596751.001.0001.
UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000142919.
UNESCO. (2024). UNESCO Framework for Culture and Arts Education. https://www.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2024/02/WCCAE_UNESCO%20Framework_EN_0.pdf.
Waddock, S. (2017). The Difference Makers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351280167.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press.
West, D. M. (2012). Big Data for Education: Data Mining, Data Analytics, and Web Dashboards. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/04-education-technology-west.pdf.
Williamson, B., & Hogan, A. (2020). Commercialization and Privatization in/of Education in the Context of COVID-19. Education International Research.
Wylie, C. (2012). Vital Connections: Why We Need More Than Self-managing Schools. NZCER Press.