The Evaluation of Life and Career Skills Development Project According to the Royal Charter Educational of Ban Pongpuey School, Bueng Kan Primary Education Area Office

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.38

Keywords:

Project Assessment; , Life and Career Skills; , Educational Royal Charter; , CIPPiest Model Assessment Model

Abstract

From the context of Ban Pongpuey School as an educational opportunity expansion school, it must create and provide opportunities for all learners to acquire knowledge and skills in life subjects, to live in society through practical experience, to plan, and to make appropriate career choices. with yourself. Therefore, the researcher has conducted an assessment of the project for developing life and occupational skills according to the Ban Pongpuey School's guidelines for education to use the research results as a guideline for the development of education management, (1) To assess the life and occupation skills development project according to the Royal Charter of Education of Ban Pongpuey School, context appropriateness. (2) To assess the project to develop life skills and occupations according to the Royal Charter of Education of Ban Pongpuey School, the readiness of inputs. (3) To assess the project to develop life skills and careers according to the educational path of the Ban Pongpuey School, and the suitability of the process. (4) To assess the project to develop life skills and occupations according to the Royal Charter of Education of Ban Pongpuey School, the productivity and expansion of the project. All of which apply to the CIPPiest Model. The target audience used in the assessment is Ban Pongpuey School stakeholders: Group 1 in the academic year 2020 consisted of 1,142 teachers, students, parents of students, and basic education committees. The second group in the 2021 academic year consists of 1,024 teachers, students, parents, and basic education committees, including 2,166 two-year academic years. Acquired by Purposive Sampling. The research process is divided into 3 phases: Phase 1: Pre-project evaluation by applying the contextual and input CIPPiest Model assessment model. Phase 2 Assessment during project implementation by applying the CIPPiest Model process evaluation model. Phase 3: Post-assessment is carried out by applying the CIPPiest Model evaluation model for productivity and scalability. There are ten assessment tools including The assessment form a 5-level estimation scale of 4 editions. Four semi-structured interview forms, and a student behavior observation form. And one student behavior test form. For all instruments, content validity was between 0.60-1.00 and confidence was between 0.85-0.97. Qualitative data analysis by content analysis and quantitative data analysis using frequency distribution statistics, percentage mean, and standard deviation. The results showed that (1) Contextual assessment found that the overall average for the academic year 2020 was at a high level, and the academic year 2021 had the highest mean. (2) The process evaluation found that the overall average for the 2020 academic year was at a high level, the academic year 2021 had the highest average. (3) The productivity and extension assessment found that the overall average for the 2020 academic year was at a high level, the academic year 2021 had the highest average.

References

Buosonte, R. (2013). CIPP and CIPIEST Evaluation Models: Mistaken and Precise Concepts of Applications. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal. 5 (2), 7-24.

Changbun, K. (2017). Performance results monitoring of the Student's morality and ethics promoting project of Khun Yaum Wittaya School, Khunyaum District, Mae Hong Son Province. Chiang Mai: Master of Education, Far Eastern University.

Chansawang, U. (2016). Assessment Report of the Moral and Ethical Development and Promotion Project of Students of Ban Yan Ta Khao School, Academic Year 2016. Trang: Office of Trang Primary Educational Service Area 1.

Jongkong, K. (2014). Assessment of project activities according to the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy Mae Sai Prasit School, Secondary Education Service Area Office 36. Surat Thani: Municipal School 5 Wasuntharaphiwat.

Kamyos, W. (2021). Evaluation of the Moral and Ethical Development Project according to the RoyalCharter Education of Banthung Community School (Inme Upratrum). Journal of UBRU Educational Review (Online). 1 (2), 1-19.

Lamjai, P. (2014). Moral Development Model, Student Ethics, Secondary School. Doctor of Philosophy thesis; University of Phayao.

Ministry of Education. (2017). Education Development Plan of the Ministry of Education No. 12 (2017-2021). Bangkok: Office of Policy and Strategy Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education.

Nilphan, M. (2011). The Curriculum Evaluation on Doctor of Philosophy Program in Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education Silpakorn University. Veridian E-Journal, SU. 4 (2), 248-262.

Noonraksa, W. (2013). Evaluation of Moral, Ethics and Desirable Character Development Project of Wat Deem Chao School Students (Attaprachanukroh). Surat Thani: Wat Doem Chao School (Attaprachanukroh), Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office, District 2.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2021). Handbook for selecting a model teacher for integrated learning management in life skills for the year 2021. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission.

Phuakpiboon, T. (2019). Project evaluation report “Phueng…learning to protect” of Mathayomsuksa 5 students at Kabin Wittaya School. Kabin Wittaya School: Office of Secondary Education Service Area 7.

Promnara, K., Ekphet, C., & Jaroensuk, N. (2021). The Project Evaluation of Career and Life Skills Management in the 21st Century Project of Banchalong School under The Primary Educational Service Area Office Phuket. Rajapark Journal. 15(41),172-185.

Sereewatana, W. (2012). A Systematic Evaluation of World-Class Standard School Project. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Educational Administration, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University.

Srimahawaro, K. (2014). Assessment of the Family Project to Adopt Sufficiency Economy Philosophy at Ban Sra Bua School. Nakhon Si Thammarat: Ban Sa Bua School.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Stufflebeam, Gulickson and Wingate. (2002). The Spirit of Consuelo: An Evaluation ofKe Aka Hòòna.The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.

Suksawat, S. (2017). Assessment of the project to enhance students' character sufficiency under the guidelines for applying the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy to educational management in Khirimaspittayakom School educational institutions. Sukhothai: Kirimaspittayakom School.

Taewpho, I. (2020). Project Evaluation: Sartpraracha Project for Learning Center Development Based on Philosophy of Subfficiency Economy of Wat Raiking (Suntornutis) School. Master of Education Thesis (Educational Administration): Silpakorn University.

Wittaya, P. (2014). Evaluation of the Pilot of the Special Classroom Chaturaphakpimanratchaapisek Scholl Project by the CIPP MODEL. Master of Education Thesis: Maha Sarakham Rajabhat University.

Wongwanich, S. (2015). Need-Based Research Assessment. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-20

How to Cite

Setthabodee, T. (2022). The Evaluation of Life and Career Skills Development Project According to the Royal Charter Educational of Ban Pongpuey School, Bueng Kan Primary Education Area Office. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 2(5), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.38