An Instructional Model for Physical Education in the Next Era for Secondary School

Jinyuan Zhu; Wisute  Tongdecharoen

doi:10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3364

Authors

Jinyuan Zhu Faculty of Sports Science and Technology, Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5554-2866
Wisute Tongdecharoen Faculty of Sports Science and Technology, Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5233-7533

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3364

Keywords:

Instructional Model; , Physical Education; , Next Era

Abstract

Background and Aim: Over the past three years of the COVID-19 pandemic, both the external sports environment for youth physical exercise and the national education policy landscape have undergone significant changes. In light of these developments and to align with physical education instruction in the next era, ensuring high-quality physical education, and promoting the physical fitness of young individuals, this study aims to construct a physical education instructional model “CISSO” (collaborate, input, school, student, output) to better regulate and optimize the process of physical education learning management and improving the quality of learning management.

Methods: This study was future research conducted with phase 1 exploring the problem by reviewing literature and 5 experts through Semi-structured interviews, the PESTEL model, and the SIPOC model to analyze influencing factors, to drat physical education instructional concept model; phase 2 by questionnaires and modified Delphi to construct physical education instructional model “CISSO”; phase 3 connoisseurship to determine and evaluate the rationality of the CISSO model.

Results: The CISSO Model contains factors of Collaborate, Input, School, Student, and Output such as: (1) Collaborate: a collaborative educational approach guided by the government, led by schools, and supported by social organizations and families. (2) Input: The key to governing school physical education management is to take more measures to increase comprehensive "Input" in school physical education learning. (3) School: The CISSO model places a significant emphasis on aligning with the Curriculum Standards (2022 Edition), and revolves around key components such as "learning, practicing, competing, and evaluation," resulting in a new and cohesive state of physical education. (4) Student: accentuates the subjectivity of students, with a pronounced focus on fostering their psychological development through sports education, thereby progressively instilling positive exercise routines. (5) Output: It holds the promise of driving improvements in students' physical abilities and fostering a greater sense of contentment among parents with the school's physical education initiatives.

Conclusion: By implementing the CISSO model, educators and policymakers can gain a deeper understanding of the intricacies involved in managing physical education during the next era of education. The findings from this study will aid in making informed and wise decisions, enabling the formulation of effective strategies to optimize the learning experience of students in this dynamic educational landscape.

References

Birchwood, D., Roberts, K., & Pollock, G. (2008). Explaining differences in sport participation rates among young adults: Evidence from the South Caucasus. European Physical Education Review, 14(3), 283-298.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723.

Chen, C. (2020). Research on the Effectiveness and Influencing Factors of Physical Education Classroom Teaching in Shanghai Middle Schools: Based on the Perspective of Learner-Centered Approach. Doctoral dissertation: Shanghai Sport University.

Chu, H. (2022). Research on Factors and Countermeasures of Junior High School Physical Education Development under the Perspective of Physical Education Middle School Entrance Examination Reform. Tianjin Sport University.

Coalter, F. (2007). A Wider Social Role for Sport; Who’s Keeping the Score. London: Routledge Press: 49-64.

Fang, X., & Shi, H. (2020). Research on student-centered university physical education curriculum design. Sports Culture Guide, 06, 98-102.

Gong, F. (2021). Discussion on Differentiated Teaching of Junior High School Physical Education under the New Curriculum Standards. New Generation (Theoretical Edition), (1), 181.

Goodman, C. M. (1987). The Delphi technique: a critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12(6), 729-734.

Hargreaves, A., Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas. L. Stoll & KS Louis (Eds.), 181-195.

Holt, K.G., Wagenaar, R.O., & Saltzman, E. (2010). A dynamic systems: constraints approach to rehabilitation. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 14, 446-463.

Hord, S. M. (Ed.). (2004). Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. Teachers College Press.

Howie, E. K., & Stevick, E. D. (2014). The “ins” and “outs” of physical activity policy implementation: inadequate capacity, inappropriate outcome measures, and insufficient funds. Journal of School Health, 84(9), 581-585.

Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B.A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation., 12(1), 1-8.

Hu, X., Tang, Y., Huang, X., et al. (2020). Research Progress on the Effects of Physical Education Learning Based on Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Sports Science, 40(4), 67-77.

Huang, Q., Zhang, X., & Ge, X. (2019). The Path and Mode of Sports Participation Promoting the Generation of Social Capital: An Empirical Analysis Based on the 2014 "China Family Panel Studies" Data. Chinese Journal of Sports Science and Technology, 55(7), 63-70.

Huang, X., Yu, Y., & Wu, P. (2021). Research on the "Poverty" Governance of Rural School Physical Education based on Spatial Justice Orientation. Journal of Sports Science, 1, 97-102.

Ji, L. (2022). Highlights and Main Changes of the 2022 Version of the Physical Education and Health Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 42(10), 54-59.

Jia, X. (2021). A Study on the Relationship between Family Factors and Physical Activity of Junior High School Students. Shanghai Sport University.

Kirk, D., Carlson, T., O'Connor, A., Burke, P., Davis, K., & Glover, S. (1997). The economic impact on families of children's participation in junior sport. Australian journal of science and medicine in sport, 29(2), 27-33.

Lee, S.W., Shimojo, S., & O’Doherty, J.P. (2014). Neural computations underlying arbitration between model-based and model-free learning. Neuron, 81(3), 687-699.

Li, H.J., & Gui, C.Y. (2020). The significance of children and adolescents' physical literacy on the promotion of physical activity. Chinese Journal of School Health, 41(2),161-165.

Li, Y., Peng, Q., Li, H., et al. (2021). Reflections on the Construction of New Models for Physical Education and Health Curriculum Teaching - Based on the "Guidelines for the Reform of Teaching of Physical Education and Health (Trial Implementation). Journal of Sports Science, 28(6), 75-81.

Liu, F. (2020). Exploration of Hierarchical Teaching in Elementary School Physical Education. Contemporary Sports Science & Technology, (19), 168.

McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351-377.

Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the Development of Coordination. WADEMG， WHITINGHTA. Motor Development in Children： Aspects of Coordination and Control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff Publisher.

Norboev, N. N. (2021). Theoretical aspects of the influence of motivation on increasing the efficiency of physical education. Current research journal of pedagogics, 2(10), 247-252.

Pan, S. W. (2022). Explanation of the concept of cultivating core literacy in compulsory education physical education and health courses in my country. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports,34(3),234-240.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon Schuster: 42-121.

Rebar, A. L., Dimmock, J. A., Jackson, B., Rhodes, R. E., Kates, A., Starling, J., & Vandelanotte, C. (2016). A systematic review of the effects of non-conscious regulatory processes in physical activity. Health psychology review, 10(4), 395-407.

Rhodes, R. E., Saelens, B. E., & Sauvage-Mar, C. (2018). Understanding physical activity through interactions between the built environment and social cognition: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 48, 1893-1912.

Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375.

Shao, W., Li, H., Qi, J., Li, Q. (2020). Ways, dilemmas, and strategies of aligning core literacy in sports with teaching objectives. Journal of Physical Education. 27(6): 90-96.

Shimoga, S. V., Erlyana, E., & Rebello, V. (2019). Associations of social media use with physical activity and sleep adequacy among adolescents: Cross-sectional survey. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(6), e14290.

Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., & O’Connor, W. (2003). Analysis: practices, principles, and processes. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 199, 218.

Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher-learners. Teaching and teacher education, 14(1), 21-32.

Von Der Gracht, H.A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological forecasting and social change, 79(8), 1525-1536.

Warburton, D. E., & Bredin, S. S. (2017). Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Current opinion in cardiology, 32(5), 541-556.

Welk, G.J. (1999). The youth physical activity promotion model: A conceptual bridge between theory and practice. Quest, 51(1), 5-23.

Yin, Z. H., Meng, H., Sun, M. Z., et al. (2022). Thinking principles and practice paths of core literacy training in physical education and health curriculum under the background of new curriculum standards. Journal of Capital Institute of Physical Education. 34(3), 253-262.

Zhang, L., & Sun, Y. (2022). Performance, Causes, and Solutions of the Dilemma of Empowerment and Capability Enhancement Actions of Physical Education Teachers in the Context of Curriculum Reform. Journal of Sports Science, 29(1), 130-137.

Zhang, Y. (2017). Research on Student-Centered Junior High School Physical Education Classroom Teaching. New Curriculum, (5), 23.

Zhang, Y. (2019). The Realistic Dilemma and Optimization Strategy of Physical Education Classroom Teaching in Primary and Secondary Schools from the Perspective of Subject Core Literacy. Sports Excellence, 38(6), 23-24.