Construction of Outdoor Adventure Education Courses to Develop Psychological Resilience for University Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3479

Keywords:

Outdoor Adventure Education; , Psychological Resilience; , University Students

Abstract

Background and aims: Most schools only pay attention to the cultivation of students' bodies, knowledge, and skills, but neglect the development and training of university students' psychological skills. When university students exhibit some psychological problems, often will be given to students' mental health education centers to solve, due to the student's mental health education center teachers and the site being more limited. This study aims to evaluate the impact of outdoor adventure education courses on the psychological resilience of university students.

Materials and methods: The researchers used an experience-based learning circle model, incorporating The Resiliency Wheel, Full value contracts, and guidance techniques. Using quantitative studies, interviews, and experimental data, participants were divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The effect of the adventure education course as an 8-week intervention was studied using the psychological resilience Scale. Data were analyzed using a t-test and one-way ANOVA. The experimental group scored higher than the control group in the total scores of psychological resilience and the three components (tenacity, strength, optimism), and these results were statistically significant. Further, the experimental group shows marginal positive changes in the total resilience scale and its three dimensions in terms of effect size. The designed adventure education courses significantly improve the psychological resilience of university students.

Results: The results found that the psychological resilience level of university students was significantly improved after the intervention, and the scores in the dimensions of tenacity, strength, and optimism significantly increased after the intervention. through the research of this paper, we can expand the analytical perspective of psychological resilience and provide a new way of thinking for the improvement of the psychological resilience of university students.

Conclusion: The content of previous interventions on psychological resilience and the factors affecting psychological resilience, applying the concept of the psychological resilience wheel to this course, And the full value contract, guide technology, and outdoor adventure education courses are fully combined and designed.

References

Bull, S., Shambrook, C., James, W., & Brooks, E. (2005). Towards an understanding of mental toughness in elite English cricketers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 209–227.

Chang, Y., Davidson, C., Conklin, S., & Ewert, A. (2019). The impact of short-term adventure-based outdoor programs on college students’ stress reduction. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(1), 67-83.

Ewert, A. W. (2014). Outdoor adventure education: Foundations, theory, and research. Human Kinetics.

Flett, G. L. (2018). Resilience to interpersonal stress: Why mattering matters when building the foundation of mentally healthy schools. Handbook of school-based mental health promotion: An evidence-informed framework for implementation, 383-410.

Harper, N., Rose, K., & Segal, D. (2019). Nature-based therapy: A practitioner's guide to working outdoors with children, youth, and families. New Society Publishers.

Houge Mackenzie, S., & Hodge, K. (2020). Adventure recreation and subjective well-being: A conceptual framework. Leisure Studies, 39(1), 26-40.

Lin, H., & Wu, C. (2021). The impact of experiential education courses on the resilience of first-year college students. Humanities and Social Sciences Research: Education, 15(3), 1-23.

Liu, X. (2019). The relationship between the college students’ resilience and coping style. Adv. Psychol, 9, 436-443.

Liu, Z., & Guo, L. (2020). The impact of life events on college students’ psychological resilience: The multiple mediating effects of self-efficacy and social support. Advances in Psychology, 10(9), 1389-1397.

Pan, J.-Y., & Zhuang, X. (2022). Effectiveness of an Adventure-based Cognitive Behavioral Program for Hong Kong University Students. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(2), 227–237.

Puhakka, R. (2023). Effects of outdoor adventures on emerging adults’ well-being and connection with nature. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-16.

Shafie, M. S., & Che Mat, H. (2014). Advancing Recreational Studies: An Analysis of Mental Toughness in Outdoor Adventure Program. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Sports Science, Exercise, Engineering and Technology 2014 (ICoSSEET 2014) (pp. 267-276). Springer Singapore.

Vella, S. L. C., & Pai, N. B. (2019). A theoretical review of psychological resilience: Defining resilience and resilience research over the decades. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences, 7(2), 233-239.

Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). The Effect of Outdoor Adventure Education on the Psychological Resilience of University Students. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 20(2), 1-8.

Webb, D. J. (1999). Recreational outdoor adventure programs. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure programming. State College, PA: Venture.

Wu, C. C., & Li, C. W. (2023). Effectiveness of adventure education programs in improving resilience: a case of University Freshmen in Taiwan. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-12.

Yu, X., & Zhang, J. (2007). A comparison of the Self-Resilience Scale and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Psychological Science, 30(5), 1169-1171.

Zhang, J., Chen, J., & Yu, X. (2021). The Relationship between Psychological Resilience and Adaptation of College Students. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 9(1), 1-7.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-17

How to Cite

Li , Y., & Ariyasajsiskul, S. . (2023). Construction of Outdoor Adventure Education Courses to Develop Psychological Resilience for University Students. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 3(6), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3479