Improvement of Changbar Application Teaching on Student Singing Performance in Media and Communications, Sichuan University

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.3671

Keywords:

Vocal Teaching; , Blended Teaching; , Vocal Education

Abstract

Background and Aim: Background and Purpose: A flipped classroom, as a modern teaching method, has been widely concerned with improving students' academic performance. This study uses a flipped classroom teaching strategy and modern technology to conduct teaching experiments on students. Through vocal singing tests and questionnaire surveys, this study investigated the influence of mixed teaching methods on the academic achievement of experimental group students.

Materials and Methods: Materials and methods: This study is a quasi-experimental study using quantitative research methods. The subjects of this study are sophomore students majoring in vocal music at the Sichuan University of Media and Communication in China. There is only one group of students, all of whom are experimental groups. The mixed teaching strategy was adopted by 100 students from Class A and Class B in the experimental group. Through the Singing test, we try to understand students' ability in Singing Intonation, Rhythm, Pronunciation, and Stage Performance. And the Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use of ChangbarAPP in blended teaching curricula. The data was collected through tests and questionnaires and analyzed using the statistical software Jamovi. The hypothesis was tested by paired sample t-test.

Results: The results show that blended teaching methods have a very positive impact on students' academic performance. Students' vocal singing ability has been significantly improved. Students showed higher Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use when using ChangbarAPP for blended learning.

Conclusion: Based on the research results, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the application of blended teaching in the vocal music curriculum.

References

Aarons, D. (2013). Lexical tense markers in American Sign Language. In Language, gesture, and space (pp. 235-264). Psychology Press.

Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by Analysing Commonly Used External Factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036

Appelman, D.R. (1967). SCIENCE OF VOCAL PEDAGOGY: THEOR. Indiana University Press

Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning. London: Learning and skills development agency, 2(4), 44-75.

Aufegger, L., Perkins, R., Wasley, D., & Williamon, A. (2017). Musicians’ perceptions and experiences of using simulation training to develop performance skills. Psychology of Music, 45(3), 417-431.

Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C.A., Tamim, R.M., Surkes, M.A., & Bethel, E.C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. doi:10.3102/0034654309333844.

Bonk, C.J., & Graham, C.R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer publishing.

Chuttur, M.Y. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1-23.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Dalla Bella, S., Giguère, J.F., & Peretz, I. (2009). Singing in congenital amusia. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), 414-424.

Dannenberg, R.B. (2007, June). New interfaces for popular music performance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 130-135).

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.

Erdfelder et al., (1996). GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods. 28(1),1-11. DOI:10.3758/BF03203630

Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105.

Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

Graham, C.R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In: Bonk, C.J. and Graham, C.R., Eds., Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, 3-21.

Grahn, J. A., & Brett, M. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 19(5), 893-906.

Hair Jr., J.F., & et al. (2014) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review, 26, 106-121.https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Kenny, D.T., & Ackermann, B.J. (2016). Hitting the high notes: Healthy aging in professional orchestral musicians. In The Aging Workforce Handbook (pp. 355-376). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Kitchakarn, O.J. (2016). How Students Perceived Social Media as a Learning Tool in Enhancing Their Language Learning Performance. Turkish Journal of Online Educational Technology-TOJET,15(4), 53-60.

Lee, M.Y., Shin, I.S., Jeon, W.Y., Lim, H.S., Kim, J.H., & Ha, H. (2013). Pinellia ternata Breitenbach attenuates ovalbumin-induced allergic airway inflammation and mucus secretion in a murine model of asthma. Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology, 35(3), 410-418.

Lim, K.A., & Raphael, C. (2009). InTune: a musician's intonation visualization system. In SIGGRAPH Talks.

Lim, Y. S., Kim, H. B., Park, J. H., Cho, C. G., Park, S. W., Lee, J. S., & Kwon, S. K. (2018). Effects of excessive fibrin deposit and polylactide adhesion barrier on wound healing in thyroidectomy murine wound model. Head & Neck, 40(6), 1207-1213.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Miller, M. (2014). Minds Online: Teaching Effectively with Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rosenthal, E.A. et al. (2018) Rare loss of function variants in candidate genes and risk of colorectal cancer. Human Genetics, 137(10),795-806. doi:10.1007/s00439-018-1938-4

Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: research, practice, and challenges. Distance education in China, 3(5), 5-11.

Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of Item-Objective Congruence for Multidimensional Items. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0302_5

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., & Morris, M. G. (2003). Dead or Alive? The Development, Trajectory, and Future of Technology Adoption Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 1-47.

Zhu, X., Chan, D.S., Hu, H., Prabhu, M.S., Ganesan, E., & Bonomi, F. (2015). Improving video performance with edge servers in the fog computing architecture. Intel Technol J. 19(1), 202-224.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-18

How to Cite

De, J., & Lu , Z. (2024). Improvement of Changbar Application Teaching on Student Singing Performance in Media and Communications, Sichuan University. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 4(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.3671