An Application of Dynamic Layer Teaching Program to Enhance a Learning Outcome in Basic Badminton Course for College Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3700

Keywords:

Dynamic Layered Teaching Program; , Badminton; , College Student;, Learning Outcome

Abstract

Background and Aims: Currently, physical education teachers should shift their teaching methods towards “paying more attention to the individual difference among the students” according to the concepts of “student-centered” and “individual difference”. Therefore, the objective of this research was to develop a dynamic layered teaching program to enhance badminton learning outcomes in college students on badminton skills and techniques, knowledge, attitude, social development, physical fitness, and mental fitness.

Materials and Methods: The population of this study was 240 students of the academic year 2023 students at Guangzhou Sport University who take badminton as an elective course. This research randomly sampled two male classes with 64 students to serve as the experimental group and the control group, and each group consists of 32 male students, divided into two groups by systematic method based on badminton skills tests. The experimental group taught with a dynamic layered teaching program and the control group taught with a traditional teaching program. The research instrument was the dynamic layered teaching program in badminton which has been quality checked by trying out with 3 students, 9 students, and 30 students to find the efficiency of the program (E1/E2 = 70/70). The total duration of the experiment was 8 weeks, 3 sessions a week, and 2 hours a session. The subjects in the experimental group were divided into low-skill, medium-skill, and high-skill based on badminton skills tests. The data were analyzed with paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and descriptive statistics.

Results: The dynamic layered teaching program in badminton had more significant advantages than the traditional teaching program in enhancing badminton skills and techniques, knowledge, attitude, social development, and mental health. However, there were no significant differences observed in physical fitness.

Conclusion: The dynamic layered teaching program in badminton can enhance badminton learning outcomes in college students and provide an effective approach for personalized instruction and targeted training. However, there were no significant differences observed in physical fitness indicators. These findings support the promotion and application of dynamic layered teaching programs in physical education.

References

Amer, E. (2015). Effective Teaching Strategies That Mind Individual Differences. LinkedIn. Retrieved from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/effective-teaching-strategies-mind-individual-amer-emran.

Chai, X. (2022). An experimental study on the use of “layered asynchronous” teaching method in the teaching of small basketball. Master's thesis, Soochow University.

Duan, T. (2023). Experimental research on dynamic layered teaching mode in aerobics teaching in sports colleges and universities. Master Thesis, Xi'an Institute of Physical Education and Sports.

He, H., & Xiang, H. (2020). Exploration and practice research on university sports hierarchical teaching. Sports goods and science and technology, 8,154-155.

Hou, L. (2018). Discussion on the practical application of university sports hierarchical teaching. Contemporary Sports Science and Technology, 5, 90-91.

Kubat, U. (2018) Identifying the Individual Differences Among Students During Learning and Teaching Process by Science Teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 30-38

Liu, M. (2018). Research on hierarchical teaching methods to promote the improvement of college students' badminton technical movements. Sports World.

Ly, Y. (2023). Experimental Research on Dynamic Layered Teaching Method in the Teaching of Volleyball Specialized Classes for Sports Training Majors in Sports Colleges and Universities. Master Thesis, Xi'an Institute of Physical Education and Sports.

Müller, F. H., & Louw, J. (2004). Learning Environment, Motivation, and Interest: Perspectives on Self-Determination Theory. South African Journal of Psychology, 34, 169-190.https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630403400201

Park, V., & Datnow, A.J. (2017). Ability grouping and differentiated instruction in an era of data-driven decision-making. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 281-306, DOI:10.1086 /689930

Tan, S. (2022). An experimental study of hierarchical cooperative teaching mode in table tennis elective course in general colleges and universities. Master's Thesis, Harbin Institute of Physical Education and Sports.

Tomlinson, C.A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. 2nd Edition, ASCD, Alexandria.

Wang, G., (2022). Research on the construction of a basketball competition system of "school and community" for youth in Sichuan Province. Master thesis, Chengdu University.

Williyanto, S., Nasuka, N., & Kusuma, D. W. Y. (2018). The Development of Badminton Skills Test Instruments for Athletes in Age of Children, Cub, Teenager and Youth. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 7(1), 50-54.

Yang, S. (2020) Exploration and practice of university physical education hierarchical teaching mode. Journal of Physical Education, 4, 117-120. doi:10.16237/j.cnki.cn44-1404/g8.2020.04.013.

Zhang, Q. (2022). An experimental study of dynamic hierarchical teaching method in the teaching of spacer net confrontational item group in sports colleges and universities. Master Thesis, Xi'an Institute of Physical Education and Sports.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-19

How to Cite

Chen, T., Tasnaina, N., & Tongdecharoen, W. (2023). An Application of Dynamic Layer Teaching Program to Enhance a Learning Outcome in Basic Badminton Course for College Students . International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 3(5), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3700