A Construction of Evaluation Index Model for the Sustainable Development of Volleyball in University, Shaanxi Province, the People’s Republic of China

Da  Huo; Chanchai Siriphan

doi:10.60027/ijsasr.2024.4083

Authors

Da Huo Faculty of Sports Science and Technology, Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9245-9109
Chanchai Siriphan Faculty of Sports Science and Technology, Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9981-655X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.4083

Keywords:

Evaluation Index Model; , Volleyball; , Sustainable Development

Abstract

Background and Aim: Volleyball is an important part of university sports. Regular participation in volleyball cannot only cultivate people's good sportsmanship, team spirit of unity and cooperation, and excellent qualities of tenacious struggle but also cultivate people's information awareness and improve coordination and adaptability. This research was to construct the evaluation index model for the sustainable development of volleyball in university, Shaanxi Province, the People’s Republic of China.

Materials and Methods: This research is mixed methods research type. The participants in this research can be divided into four groups, which are as follows: (1) 370 students and 10 teachers from 3 universities in Shaanxi China were chosen to engage in responding to the questionnaires; (2) 7 experts were invited to in-depth interview; (3) 19 experts were invited to conduct two-round Delphi study; and (4) 9 experts were invited to discuss and confirm the constructed evaluation index model for the sustainable development of volleyball in university, Shaanxi Province, the People’s Republic of China. The average and standard deviation are utilized to analyze the data obtained from the questionnaire, the consensus data is analyzed by using the median and interquartile range, with criteria set at a median of ≥ 3.50 and an interquartile range of ≤ 1.50.

Results: the model of evaluation index for volleyball sustainable development in University, Shaanxi China consists of the 4 first-level indicators classified by the theory of sustainable development, namely (A) survival support subsystem; (B) development motivation support subsystem; (C) social security support subsystem; and (D) intellectual Support Subsystem, 12 second-level indicators and 33 third-level indicators.

Conclusion: the evaluation index model for the sustainable development of volleyball in university, Shaanxi Province, the People’s Republic of China consists of the 4 first-level indicators classified by the theory of sustainable development,12 second-level indicators, and 33 third-level indicators. The content and application of this model have been evaluated and confirmed by 9 experts.

References

Best, J.W. (1977). Research in Education. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Campbell, D.T. (1981). Introduction: Getting ready for the experimenting society. In L. Saxe & M. Fine, Social experiments: Methods for design and evaluation (pp. 13-18). Sage: Beverly Hills.

Chen, J. (2021). Comprehensive evaluation technology and application. Chengdu: Southwest University of Finance and Economics Press.

Cronbach, L. (1980). Toward a reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Huang, H.S. (2009). Ball sports—Volleyball. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

Liu, W. (2009). System and indicator system construction of sustainable development of physical education. Journal of Tianjin Sports Institute, 24(4), 314-318.

Lü, Q.S., & Hu, M.D. (2009). Survey and research on the current situation of volleyball sports in ordinary universities in Henan Province. Journal of Teachers College (Natural Science Edition), 29(6), 18-20.

Ma, H.X. (2004). Analysis and strategies for the current situation of volleyball sports in Anhui colleges and universities. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Social Sciences), 18(6), 77-82.

Niu, W. (2015). Annual report for World Sustainable Development 2015. Science Press.

Scriven, M. (1993). Nature of evaluation. In M. Scriven (Ed.), New directions for program evaluation: Hard-won lessons in program evaluation (pp. 5-48) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stake, R.E. (2003). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, & D.L. Stufflebeam (Eds.) International handbook of educational evaluation (pp 31-62). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Tyler, R.W. (1942). General statement on evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 35, 492-501.

Wang, M.Y. (2009). Analysis of the current situation of volleyball sports in ordinary universities in Jilin Province. Master's degree thesis: Liaoning Normal University.

Ye, Z. (2002). Evaluation theory and practice of sustainable development. China: Environmental Science Press.

Zhang, H. (2018). Research on the Current Status and Influencing Factors of After-school Volleyball Training in Private Universities in Henan Province. Sports World, 9(2), 191-192.

Zhang, X. (2018). Research on the indicators (system) method and application of sustainable development assessment (Research Report). Lanzhou: Institute of Resource and Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4-5.

Zhang, Y. (2010). Study on the Current Status and Influencing Factors Analysis of College Students' Volleyball Sports in Jilin Province. Master’s degree thesis: Northeast Normal University