Research on the Influence of CEO's Technical Background Characteristics on the Digital Transformation Effectiveness of Manufacturing Enterprises: Taking the Marketization Process as the Moderating Variable

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.4402

Keywords:

CEO Technical Background Characteristics; , Manufacturing Enterprises; , Digital Transformation; , Marketization Process

Abstract

Background and Aims: The digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises is a critical aspect of modern business dynamics, with CEOs playing a central role in navigating this evolution. This study investigates the influence of CEO technical background characteristics on the effectiveness of digital transformation within manufacturing enterprises, while also considering the mediating role of external environment perception and the moderating impact of marketization processes.

Methodology: Drawing on data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed manufacturing enterprises spanning 2016 to 2021, quantitative research methods are employed to analyze the relationship between CEO technical background characteristics and digital transformation outcomes.

Results: The findings highlight the significant impact of CEO technical backgrounds on digital transformation effectiveness, with external environment perception serving as a mediator in this relationship. Moreover, in regions characterized by high marketization processes, CEO technical backgrounds demonstrate a heightened influence on digital transformation outcomes.

Conclusion: This study contributes to the understanding of digital transformation dynamics in manufacturing enterprises and offers insights into strategic leadership and organizational change management practices.

References

Atrostic, B.K., & Nguyen, S.V. (2005). IT and productivity in US manufacturing: do computer networks matter? Economic Inquiry, 43 (3), 493-506.

Cao, Z. (2018). Research on the new manufacturing mode to promote the high-quality development of Chinese industry under the background of the digital economy. Theoretical discussion, 2, 99-104.

Christensen, C.M. (2003). The innovator's dilemma: The revolutionary book that will change the way you do business. HarperCollins Publishers

Deng, X. (2001). Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume 3. People's publishing house.

Dong, A., Garbuio, M., & Lovallo, D. (2016). Generative sensing: A design perspective on the micro-foundations of sensing capabilities. California Management Review, 58 (4), 97-117.

Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10‐11), 1105-1121.

Faccio, M., Masulis, R.W., & McConnell, J.J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61 (6), 2597-2635.

Fan, G. (2003). The Dual-Transformation of China: Past 20 Years and 50 Years Ahead.” Emerging Market Economies: Globalization and Development. Ed. Kołodko, Grzegorz W. Burlington, VT; Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2003.

Gao, H., & Wang, C. (2020) Analysis of the digital transformation of physical retail enterprises based on dynamic capability theory. Business Economics Research, 2020 (1),9-83.

Gu, H., & Yang, Z. (2012). External resources and enterprise transformation: an empirical study with the heterogeneity of senior executive team as the regulatory variable. Journal of Southeast University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 14 (4), 36-39.

Guo, W., & Zhou, H. (2020). Characteristics of the senior management team, marketization degree, and corporate social responsibility performance —— based on the analysis of Heckman's two-stage model. Technical Economics and Management Research, 2, 66-70. doi: CNKI: SUN: JXJG.0.2020-02-012.

Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 193-206.

Hambrick, D.C., Cho, T.S. and Chen, M.J. (1996) The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms’ Competitive Moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659-684. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393871

He, F., & Liu, H. (2019). Evaluation of the performance improvement effect of the digital transformation of real enterprises from the perspective of the digital economy. Reform, 4, 137-148.

He, X., Liang, G., & Wang, S. (2019). Information technology, labor force structure, and enterprise productivity —— Solve the mystery of the "information technology productivity paradox". The Management World, 35 (9), 65-80.

Helfat, C.E., & Raubitschek, R.S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47 (8), 1391-1399.

Hu, Q. (2020). The mechanism and performance of enterprise digital transformation. Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2, 146-154.

Huang, M., & Deng, X. (2013). Study on the influencing factors of the transformation and upgrading of China's construction machinery manufacturing industry —— Based on the empirical evidence of listed companies. Reform and Strategy, 4, 91-97.

Ke, C. (2017). Exploring the realization mechanism of dynamic ability. Monthly Accounting magazine (top), 9, 19-24.

Lee, M., Lee, Y., & Chou, C.J. (2017). Essential Implications of the Digital Transformation in Industry 4.0. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 76, 465-467.

Li, H. (2018). Digital transformation and enterprise core capability restructuring. Network Security and Informatization, 5, 30. doi: CNKI: SUN: WAXX.0.2018-05-024.

Li, Y., Ye, K., & Wu, P. (2022). Research and development investment, marketization degree, and enterprise professional operation. Scientific Research Management, 43 (4), 158-166.

Lin, L., & Lu, W. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on the management reform of manufacturing enterprises —— Based on the case study of Kute Intelligence and Haier. Scientific decision-making, 1, 85-98.

Liu Fei. (2020). How to improve manufacturing productivity in digital transformation ——— Based on the triple impact mechanism of digital transformation. Science of Finance, 10, 93-107.

Marx. (2004). Das Kapital. Vol. 1, People’s Publishing House, Beijing, 683.

Poon, T.S.C. (2004). Beyond the global production networks: a case of further upgrading of Taiwan's information technology industry. International journal of technology and globalization, 1 (1), 130-144.

Qian, X. (2017). Digital transformation —— enterprises need their road map. Smart Factory, 8, 1-4.

SubbaNarasimha, P.N. (2001). Strategy in turbulent environments: the role of dynamic competence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 22 (5), 201-212.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509-533.

Wang, H. (2019). How to "turn" into the digital transformation of traditional enterprises. East China Science and Technology, 3, 66-68.

Wang, R., Dong, M., & Hou, W. (2019). Research on the evaluation model and method of digital maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Science and technology management research.

Wang, X. (2017). Institutional change, CEO characteristics, and corporate strategic transformation —— Based on the empirical evidence of "three public consumption" sensitive listed companies. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 1, 106-114.

Wang, X., Fan, G., & Yu, J. (2017). China by Province Market Index Report (2016). The Social Sciences Academic Press.

Wen, Z., & Ye, B. (2014). Mediation effect analysis: Method and model development. Progress in psychological science, 22 (5), 731.

Winter, S.G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10), 991-995.

Zhan, X. (2019). Empirical research on the correlation of enterprise informatization investment value and performance. Statistics and decision-making, 6, 185-188.

Zhao, T., & Yang, G. (2020). Digital transformation and manufacturing enterprise innovation decisions. Journal of Harbin University of Business (Social Science Edition), 5, 21-37. doi: CNKI: SUN: HLJC.0.2020-05-002.

Zhu, Y., Wittmann, X., & Peng, M.W. (2012). Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 1131-1142.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-23

How to Cite

Gu, H. (2024). Research on the Influence of CEO’s Technical Background Characteristics on the Digital Transformation Effectiveness of Manufacturing Enterprises: Taking the Marketization Process as the Moderating Variable. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 4(4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.4402

Issue

Section

Articles