An Investigation on Influencing Factors of College Students’ Use Behavioral of Chaoxing Learning Platform
Abstract
Background and Aim: At present, the school where the researcher works has spent a lot of humans, material, and financial resources to guide teachers and students to use the Chaoxing learning platform. The purpose of this article is to analyze the factors that affect students' use of the platform. Including connected classroom climate (CCC), performance expectancy (PE), social influence (SI), effort expectancy (EE), facilitating conditions (FC), behavioral intention (BI), and use behavioral (UB), and the relationship between these factors, such as PE and BI, SI and BI, FC and BI, CCC and PE, PE and SI, BI and UB. This research is a quantitative study. Data were collected by questionnaire, and through stratified sampling, a total of 500 students from three different majors at Zhanjiang University of Science and Technology of China were investigated. The results of the study are as follows: There is a significant relationship between these influencing factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which each variable affected the Chaoxing learning platform.
Materials and Methods: In this paper, a total of 486 data were collected through questionnaires, and data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Model.
Results: The results of the data analysis show that there are significant effects among the variables, and all hypotheses are verified. Among them, behavioral intention has the greatest impact on the use of behavior. It shows that behavioral intention is the key factor that directly drives individual behavior. At the same time, it also shows that these variables have a significant impact on students' use of the platform.
Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of behavioral willingness in students' use of the Chaoxing learning platform and suggests that enhancing the convenience of platform use may require more attention and support.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Ainur, A. K., Deni, S., Zeinab, J., & Yep, B. W. (2017). Sample size and non-normality effects on goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 25(2), 575-586.
Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., &Norman, M.K. (2010). How LearningWorks: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Bentler, P. M. (2010). SEM with simplicity and accuracy. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 215–220.
Brandford Bervell & Valentina Arkorful. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, the voluntariness of use and use behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(6), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0183-9.
Chao, C.M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: an application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-10. Doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652.
Cho, G., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of marketing analytics, 8(4), 189-202.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dwyer, K. K., Bingham, S. G., Carlson, R. E., Prisbell, M. Cruz, A. M., & Fus, D. A. (2004). Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the Connected Classroom Climate Inventory. Communication Research Reports, 21, 264-272.
Feng, L., Kong, X.Y., Zhu, S., Yang, H.H. (2015), An Investigation of Factors Influencing College Students’ Mobile Learning Behavior. Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 (outside the US). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20621-9_27.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Harasim, H. L. (2012). Learning Theory and Online Technologies. Routledge. New York, NY.
Kuciapski, M. (2016). Students Acceptance of m-Learning for Higher Education –UTAUT Model Validation. Conference paper. First Online: September 22, 2016.
Li, Y., & Zhao, M. (2021), “A Study on the Influencing Factors of Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: UTAUT Model and CCC Moderating Effect”. Frontiers in Psychology,12,1-13.
Lukwago, I., Basu, P., Ilbawi, A., Katuruka, D., Chite, F.A., Viviano, M., Murillo, R.H., Nambasa, V., Andrua, G., & Makin, M. (2017). Cervical cancer screening in developing countries: Using visual inspection with acetic acid. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 139(2), 173-179. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12352.
Mahdi Mohammed Alamri. (2021). Using Blended Project-Based Learning for Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use and Academic Achievement in Higher Education. education Sciences.11(207), 1-11.
Masa’deh, R., Obeidat, B. and Tarhini, A. (2016) A Jordanian Empirical Study of the Associations among Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Job Performance, and Firm Performance: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Journal of Management Development, 35, 681-705. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2015-0134
Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Factor analysis and latent structure, confirmatory. Psychological Methods, 6(3), 369–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.3.369.
Musa, B. Moya, Nakalema, S. E., & Nansamba, C. (2017). Behavioral intention: Mediator of effort expectancy and actual system usage. ORSEA Journal, 7(1), 71-86.
Okeji, C. C., & Alex-Nmecha, J. C. (2022). Online LIS teaching and learning during COVID-19 in Nigeria: A study. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(3), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2021-0040.
Prisbell, M., Nance, K. L., & Zhang, S. (2009). The impact of instructor supportiveness and use of validating and invalidating comments on student responses to messages: An application of the validation theory of communication. Communication Education, 58(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802237383.
Tai, M.W., & Lee, S.W. (2021). Factors affecting students’ online behavioral intention in using discussion forums. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(3), 300-318.
Venkatesh, M. Morris, G.D., & Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Yang, H.H., Feng, L., & MacLeod, J. (2019). Understanding College Students’ Acceptance of Cloud Classrooms in Flipped Instruction: Integrating UTAUT and Connected Classroom Climate. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1258-1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746084
Yang, H.H., Feng, L., & MacLeod, J. (2019). Understanding College Students’ Acceptance of Cloud Classrooms in Flipped Instruction: Integrating UTAUT and Connected Classroom Climate. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 56(8), 1258-1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746084.
Zhu, Z.T. (2016). New developments of smarter education: from flipped classroom to smart classroom and smart learning space. Open Education Research, 22(1), 18−26, https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2016.01.002.