Factors Influencing the Leadership of College Presidents in the Informationization Era

Xiaoming Xie
Thailand
Sujin Butdisuwan
Thailand
Piyapan Santaveesuk
Thailand
Keywords: Informatization Era, Influencing Factors, Leadership of College Presidents
Published: Mar 16, 2025

Abstract

Background: Chinese universities have established information technology infrastructure. However, the transformative impact of IT on education requires further exploration. With the development of information technology in Chinese universities, there are challenges in leveraging IT to transform education effectively. Efforts such as expanding online learning spaces and promoting information technology in education management have been emphasized in government plans. The focus for university leaders is now shifting towards promoting specific IT applications in teaching and campus governance. University headmasters need to integrate information technology into classroom teaching and school management to drive impactful changes in education and administration. The research objectives are as follows: 1) To identify and analyze the effect of IT literacy on school principals' leadership. 2) To examine the effect of informatization planning ability on the informatization leadership of principals 3) To assess the effect of informatization management ability on the informatization leadership of principals. 4) To examine the effect of informatization assessment ability on the informatization leadership of principals.


Method: The researcher chose a quantitative study to generate numerical data for analysis, focusing on the descriptive relationship between variables. Questionnaires were distributed to headmasters across various regions in China via https://www.wjx.cn/login.aspx. Subsequently, 201 valid questionnaires were collected and screened for analysis.


Results: The impact of principal informational literacy on principal informational leadership is a very important and complex topic. From the final path coefficient, the principal informatization literacy path coefficient is 0.495, which is relatively high compared to the path coefficients of several other factors. This indicates that the principal's informatization literacy ability has a greater impact on the principal's informatization leadership. According to the path coefficient analysis results, the path coefficient of the principal's informational planning competence is 0.234, which is low compared to the path coefficients of the other influencing factors. This may mean that the respondents do not have a positive view of the principal's informational planning competence in influencing the principal's informational leadership. According to the path coefficient analysis results, the path coefficient of the principal's informatization management ability is 0.532, and it is significantly positively affecting the principal's informatization leadership, the highest path coefficient among the four influencing factors. This indicates that the principal's informatization management competence has a greater influence on the principal's informatization leadership. The path coefficient of principal informatization assessment competence is 0.172 indicates that principal informatization assessment competence has some influence on principal informatization leadership, but the influence is relatively weak. In other words, principal informatization assessment competence's role in principal informatization leadership is relatively small.


Conclusions: The following four conclusions were drawn by analyzing the path coefficients. Information technology literacy is positive for the informationization leadership of principals. Informationization planning capability is positive for the informationization leadership of principals. Informationization management capability is positive for the informationization leadership of principals. Informationization assessment capability is positive for the informationization leadership of principals.

Article Details

How to Cite

Xie, X. ., Butdisuwan, S., & Santaveesuk, P. . (2025). Factors Influencing the Leadership of College Presidents in the Informationization Era. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 5(2), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2025.5593

Section

Articles

References

Bai, H. Q., Mao, K. Y. (2014). Motivation of CEO support for informatization: stimulating conditions and facilitating mechanisms. Nankai Management Review, 2014, 17(06), 114-125.

Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of Transformational Leadership Redux. Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463-478.

Benard, M. K. (2012). Grow your leaders: a case study of a community college leadership development program. San Diego State University.

Collinson, D. L., & Grint, K. (2005). Editorial: The Leadership Agenda. Leadership, 1(1), 5-9.

Deng, Xiaohua. (2012). A review of the research on principal informatization leadership in China. Information Technology Education for Primary and Secondary Schools (2), 3.

Duan, Chunyu. (2020). Research on the influence of principals' information technology leadership on teachers' information technology application behavior - A meta-analysis based on 42 empirical research papers. China Distance Education (10), 13.

Erdia, E. (2018). Principal leadership style and job satisfaction of high school teachers. European Journal of Education, 1(3), 109-115.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Friedel, J. N. (2010). University-based community college leadership programs: where future community college leaders are prepared. New Directions for Community Colleges, 149, 51-58.

Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics Research Methods: Employing Structural Equation Modeling to Test for Construct Validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20, 33-57.

Gibson, D. M., Dollarhide, C. T., & Mccallum, L. J. (2011). Nontenured assistant professors as American Counseling Association Division Presidents: the new look of leadership in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(3), 285-292.

Jr, C. (2011). Ethical leadership in the community college: bridging theory and daily practice, d.m. Hellmich. Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

Prusha, T. (2006). Strategic planning in community college information technology: a Delphi study of model programs. APS March Meeting Abstracts.

Southworth, G. (1999). Small successes: What lessons can be learned from successful heads of small primary? Managing Schools Today, 9(2), 59-61.

Tyssen, A.K.,Wald, A.,& Spieth, P.(2013). Leadership in Temporary Organizations: A Review of Leadership Theories and a Research Agenda. Project Management Journal, 44(6), 52-67

Wang, Y-M., Du, Y.J., & Wu, H.Y. (2007). Connotation and development of educational informatization leadership. China Education Informatization-Basic Education.