Development of Teaching and Learning Model by Integration of Political Education and Physical Education for University Students
Abstract
Background and Aim: In 2017 and 2022, the Ministry of Education promoted all-round youth development, demonstrating the country's strong emphasis on physical education in schools. The aim was to enhance students' physical and mental health as well as their overall development. In response to the national initiative, the Ministry of Education has supported the integration of moral education across various academic disciplines. Therefore, the objectives of this research were 1) to develop a teaching and learning model by integrating political education and physical education for university students; 2) to implement the university teaching design; and 3) to evaluate the effects of integrating political education and physical education in the teaching design for university students.
Materials and Methods: In this research, the researcher followed these steps: First, relevant research documents related to the curriculum of political education and physical education were studied. Then, feedback on teaching and learning models integrating political education and physical education for university students was collected. After obtaining the research structure, the opinions of 17 experts were gathered using the Delphi method in two rounds. The model obtained was then confirmed by 9 experts using the Connoisseurship method. In this research, mean, standard deviation, percentage, median, and interquartile range were used to analyze the data.
Results: The research found that the teaching and learning model by integrating political education and physical education for university students was divided into 8 components, 16 factors, and 43 indicators. 8 key components were as follows: (1) class objective and goals; (2) teaching design; (3) teaching method; (4) assessment and evaluation; (5) resource and materials; (6) teachers support; (7) implementation strategy; (8) students learning attitude.
Conclusion: The teaching and learning model by integrating political education and physical education for university students covered all aspects of education, combining knowledge of political concepts with knowledge of physical education. This model was innovative and highly effective.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain.
Longmans, Green.Chen, L. (2019). Safeguarding students' physical and mental health: The role of sports ideology in education. Journal of Health and Education, 7(3), 30-45.
Cheng, G., & Wang, J. (2019). Integrating Ideological and Political Education into Professional Courses: Objectives, Assessments, and Curriculum Exploration. Journal of Educational Integration, 14(2), 78-92.
Dineck, C. (2004). Reconsidering Teaching Ability: A Comprehensive Model of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 45-60.
Eichler, B., & McDonald, J. K. (2021). Beyond Design: The Implementation Phase in Instructional Design. Journal of Instructional Design, 15(3), 45-62.
Fink, L.D. (2005). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 2, 266-267.
Franziska, S. (2009). Components of Effective Teaching: Subject Knowledge, Teaching Monitoring,Methods, and Evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 223-234.
Fu, A., Ruan, Y., & Peng, T. (2012). Ideological and Political Education in Germany: Roles of Schools and Families. Journal of Comparative Education Studies, 8(2), 112-128.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Li, X. (2020). Integrating political education into physical education: A pathway to holistic student development. Journal of Educational Development, 12(3), 45-58.
Ministry of Education. (2017). National Youth Development Plan (2017-2022). Beijing: Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education. (2022). Guidelines for Integrating Moral Education into School Curricula. Beijing: Ministry of Education.
Mouratidou, K. (2007). Physical education and moral development: An intervention program to promote moral reasoning through physical education in high school students. European Physical Education Review, 13(1).
Pang, Q., Zhang, L., & Li, X. (2021). A Comprehensive Plan for Integrating Political and Physical Education: Perspectives from Supply, Demand, and Management. Journal of Experiential Learning and Educational Innovation, 16(1), 33-49.
Pu Qingping & He Liling. (2021).Enhancing Ideological and Political Teaching Quality: Emphasizing Preparation, Implementation, and Evaluation. Journal of Educational Development and Innovation,18(2), 45-60.
Qiu, W. (2017).The Core Role of Teachers in Ideological and Political Education: Quality, Materials, and System Construction. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 22(4), 101-115.
Qiu, X., & Xu, Y. (2017). From Ideological and Political Courses to Courses on Ideology and Politics: The Theoretical Starting Point and Practical Mechanism of "Curriculum Ideology and Politics". Journal of Ideological and Theoretical Education, 5(2), 50-53.Rousseau, J.J. (2016).
Emile (Volumes 1 and 2). In Ye, H. (Trans.).Beijing: Taiwan Strait Publishing House.
Smith, J., & Brown, A. (2019).Foundations of Educational Theory: Exploring Principles and Practices in Teaching and Learning. Educational Review, 45(3), 125-146.
Sternberg, R. J. (1983). The Role of Personal Attributes in Teaching Competence: A Competency Model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 223-230.
Wang (2019). Innovation and practice of sports ideological and political education in colleges and universities: Centered on the construction of a sports ideological and political education platform in colleges and universities. Contemporary Education Practice and Teaching Research, 10(12), 129-133.
Wang, L., & Zhang, D. (2021). Research on the feasibility and implementation strategy of ideological and political integration in college physical education teaching. Journal of Physical Education (Science and Education), 12(6), 78-82.
Zhang, W. (2018). Thoughts on the implementation of the curriculum ideological and political in the teaching of professional courses in colleges and universities. Journal of Ideological and Theoretical Education, 18(5), 55-59.
Zhang, Y., & Yang, M. (2021). The Value of Ideological and Political Teaching Evaluation: Cultivating Talents with Ability and Political Integrity. Journal of Educational Assessment and Development, 23(3), 78-92.