The Application of Maker Education in the Cultivation of Children's Innovation Ability in Shenzhen City
คำสำคัญ:
Maker Education, Management Model, Evaluation Mechanismบทคัดย่อ
The focus of this study is to improve the innovation ability of Shenzhen children through maker education and the management mode of maker education, so as to promote the cultivation of children's creativity. Primary school students in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province were studied in this study. Fifteen schools were randomly selected from each district of Shenzhen, and 15 students aged 8-9 and 2 teachers were selected from each school. The research tools were :A) children's cognitive creative thinking ability assessment questionnaire and children's cognitive problem solving ability scale; B) The Williams creative Tendency Scale was used to measure children's cognitive creative thinking performance and the questionnaire was used to investigate teachers' cognition of maker education and teaching; C) Questionnaire survey to measure the actual situation of teachers in maker education; D) Performance scale questionnaire measures the impact of maker education on students' innovation ability. The main results of this study are as follows: Maker education plays a key role in the cultivation of children's innovation ability, and there is a chain intermediary relationship between the management model of maker education and the evaluation mechanism of maker education.
Shenzhen actively practices the educational concept of "morality, ability and general education", forming a path to promote the comprehensive quality training of Shenzhen students through curriculum reform. Based on the model of maker education, it is considered that maker education is a systematic project. We will coordinate and promote maker courses, maker Spaces, maker learning, and maker teachers. The research significance of this study: innovation is the soul of a nation's progress, training innovative talents is an important responsibility and mission in the era of education, and the implementation of maker education mode is the most effective way to train innovative talents. There are many factors affecting children's creativity. (Xue Ming, 2020) The model of maker education and creative management is one of the most effective training models. The purpose of this study is to study how to improve children's creativity and imagination. Creativity is the key to a child's future competitiveness. Maker education meets the requirements of the Ministry of Education of China to improve the quality of students and teachers, and has practical significance for the research and development of maker education in China. (Xueming, 2020)
เอกสารอ้างอิง
ZhitingZhu. (2015). The practice field of innovative education enabled by information technology in maker education. China Audio-visual Education.
affiliations, O. Z. (First published November 1967). The Experimental Psychology Group, 1946–1958. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Volume 19, Issue 4.
Craik, K. J. (1940). A simple multi-speed pencil polygraph. Journal of Scientific Instruments,, DOI 10.1088/0950-7671/17/2/303.
ZhitingZhu. (2015). The practice field of innovative education enabled by information technology in maker education. China Audio-visual Education.
Adler, I. S. (2018). Reading between the lines: The effect of contextual factors on student motivation throughout an open inquiry process. Science Education, pp. 820-855.
Shen Hong, G. Z. (2011). An empirical study on the influencing factors of college teachers' working hours. Research of higher education, pp. 55-63.
Shenzhen Municipal People's Government. (June 17, 2015). Measures to promote the development of makers in Shenzhen. Retrieve: Guangdong Provincial People's Government Network: http://www.gd.gov.cn/zwgk/wjk/zcfgk/content/post_
html.
Skaalvik, E. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, pp. 518-524.
Skaalvik, E. M. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, pp. 1029-1038.
SmithP.C., Kendall, L.M. & Hullin, C.L. (1969). The Measurement of Job Satisfaction In Work and Retirement. Chicago: Rand and McNally.
Southern daily. (2017,10). What does Maker education 2.0 look like? Shenzhen will invest 45 million yuan to build 100 more maker practice rooms. Search source: Nanfang Dailyhttp://pc.nfapp.southcn.com/39/685729.html
Stensaker., C. B. (2007). Developing Capacity for Change. Journal of Change Management, p. 217- 231.
Sun Hanyin. (2009). The Moderating effect of organizational justice on the relationship between perceived organizational politics and job satisfaction: A case study of Middle school teachers in Beijing. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition), pp. 60-67.
Tsinghua university. (2015). Blue Book of Maker Education in China. Maker Education Laboratory, Tsinghua University.
Usrev, E. (2011). Dilemma of Silence Vortex and Commitment：Relationship between Employee Silence and Organizational Commitment. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics &Administrative Sciences, pp. 97-124.
Wang Chunchun. (2010, 5). The Quality Standards and Evaluation of Higher Education. University (Academic edition), pp. 12-23.
Wang Huaiyu, L. J. (2016). A Preliminary study on the cultivation strategy of maker teachers in universities. China Audio-visual Education.
Wang Weiping. (2015). Research on the Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction of Middle School Backbone Teachers. Education theory and practice, pp. 35-38.
Wang Ziya. (2014). A Study on teachers' personality traits, career self-efficacy and job satisfaction. National Chenggong University.
Wang, P. (2005). Promoting teaching Management Reform with Innovative Spirit [J]. China Higher Education Research, pp. 83-84.
Wei Shuhua, S. G. (2012, 06). Teachers' professional identity and turnover intention: The Mediating Role of job satisfaction. New psychology, pp. 564-569.
WeiGuo. (2015,8). A review of maker research from the perspective of education in China. Modern educational technology, pp.107-111.
wenhuazhang. (2000). Creative Thinking. A large dictionary of education.
Whitehead. (2002). The purpose of Education. Beijing: Life, Reading, New Knowledge Sanlian Bookstore.
Zhao Hui-chenXiao-tingLu. (2016). Carry out STEAM Education to Improve students' innovation ability -- Interview with Professor Grete Arkman, a well-known scholar of STEAM Education in the United States. Open Education Research, P 22(5), 5-6.
Zhao Yan, X. J.-l. (2012). Investigation on Job Satisfaction of Teachers in Xizang Universities and Its Improvement Countermeasures. Teacher education research, pp. 80-84+55.
Zhengzhou, L. (1998). Management Incentive. Shanghai: Shanghai Finance and Economics Publishing House.
Zhijun, L. (2002). On the establishment of the Evaluation Standards of classroom Teaching Quality. Journal of east China normal university: education science edition, pp. 53-55.
Zhou Shike, G. H. (2019, 8). Analysis of influencing factors of job satisfaction of Primary school teachers based on Large-scale Survey Data in Province. Research of Education Science, pp. 47-52.
Zhu Xincheng, Z. Y. (2005, 5). Career Satisfaction Survey of the Young College Teachers: Analysis and Countermeasures. Higher Education Research, p. 56.
Zhu Yina, M. Y. (2015). Gender, Time distribution and scientific research output of university teachers. Women's Studies, pp. 24-30, 49.
Zuoping, Z. (1995). Teaching Staff and teaching quality in Universities in Guangdong Province, We are in the same boat.
ไฟล์ประกอบ
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
หมวดหมู่
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2025 วารสารวิจัยธรรมศึกษา
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
