Global Trends of Intercultural Communication Leadership of Art Design Administrators in Universities under Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
คำสำคัญ:
Intercultural Communication Leadership, Art Design Education, Administratorsบทคัดย่อ
The objectives of this research were: (1) to propose the intercultural communication leadership for Art Design administrators in universities under Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area; and (2) to develop future wheels of global trends for intercultural communication leadership for Art Design administrators in universities under Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. The research was qualitative research with Delphi technique and Future wheel study. The key informants consisted of 17 experts for Delphi technique and 7 experts for Future wheel study. They were highly experienced academic administrators and education experts, and they were obtained by purposive sampling method. The instruments used for data collection were researcher, from open-ended interview form, and five-point rating scale questionnaire. The statistics used for data analysis were Median, Mode, and Inter Quartile Range.
The research findings revealed that: (1) intercultural communication leadership for Art Design administrators in Universities under Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has 10 dimensions and 71 variables. The10 dimensions were: intercultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity, intercultural communication skills, learning ability, creativity and innovation, leadership, team work, adaptability, and objective conditions. (2) future wheels of global trends for intercultural communication leadership for Art Design administrators in universities under Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has 3 orders. The first order has 10 dimensions (global trends within 3 years): intercultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural sensitivity, intercultural communication skills, learning ability, creativity and innovation, leadership, team work, adaptability, and objective conditions. The second order has 22 dimensions (global trends after 3-6 years): intercultural experience, self-awareness, cross-border laws and policies, insight, emotional factors, intercultural mutual trust, intercultural negotiations, multicultural communication environment, education and training, renew knowledge, application of intercultural technologies, entrepreneurial ecology and support, intercultural leadership, execution, intercultural team development, intercultural conflict resolution, multicultural cooperation, remote cooperation, flexibility, adjust measures to local conditions, technological development, cultural integration. The third order has 10 dimensions (global trends after 6-9 years): cultural intelligence, cross-border market insight, intercultural and social responsibility, intercultural understanding, advance with the times, intercultural strategy, multicultural management, intercultural talent flow and management, global collaboration, globalization environment.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Chen Tianshi, Yang Yang, Chen Yalin. (2021). Characteristics and Problems Analysis of Arts Education in Universities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Journal of South China University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 23(3), 38-46.
Chen Xin. (2012). From the perspective of Intercultural communication ability to explore the curriculum design of international foreign language talents training. Foreign Languages, (5), 73-78.
Chinese Communist Party Central Committee & State Council. (2019). Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.
Du Dan., & Wu Cunxiang (2018). A Study on Cross-cultural Communication Competence in International Business. Modern Communication, (06), 118-119.
Glenn, Jerome C. (1972) "Futurizing Teaching vs Futures Course," Social Science Record, Syracuse University, Volume IX, No. 3 Spring.
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (Eds.). (2009). Futures Research Methodology-Version 3-0. Editorial desconocida.
Han Chenmei & Zhu Min. (2022). Contrast the Differences Between Chinese and Western Polite Language from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Education Journal, 5(4).
He, B., Li, Z., & Zheng, H. (2014). Content structure model and validation study of intercultural leadership: A case study of Sino-German intercultural teams. Economics and Management, (12), 83-94.
Li Jiang. (2022). Application of Lingnan non-material cultural heritage in art education of universities in the Greater Bay Area: a case study of Xing Lion in Foshan. Mass Art, (23), 187-189.
Li, J. Y. (2022). A survey of intercultural sensitivity in the new media environment. Forum on Communication, 5(14), 82-84.
Liu, Y. (2021). The generation logic and construction path of cross-cultural leadership under the background of "One Belt One Road". Leadership Science Forum, (01), 132-135.
Schneider, S. C., & Zhang, G. (2019). Managing Across Cultures. Machinery Industry Press.
Zhang Ting, Wang Xiaohui, Zhou Fan. (2021). Cross-cultural Communication Leadership and Arts Education in Universities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Art Education Research, 2, 83-89.
ไฟล์ประกอบ
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
หมวดหมู่
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2025 วารสารวิจัยธรรมศึกษา

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.