Is this Sustainability Development Framework Motivation to a Multi-National Enterprise?: Attesting Corporate Governance in China

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3079

Keywords:

Corporate Governance; , Sustainable Business Management; , China

Abstract

Background and Aim: The global economic crisis highlights the importance of corporate governance in large enterprises for profit protection and sustainable development. China faces challenges in implementing this framework, focusing on efficiency, effectiveness, and regulatory mechanisms.

Materials and Methods: This paper is an academic paper. The author has collated and analyzed the various aspects of the notion of corporate governance, ranking the most significant aspects in descending order.

Results: Sustainable business management in large enterprises in China involves corporate governance across five dimensions: structure, process, ethics, competence, wisdom, eco-efficiency, and sustainability report. This approach creates long-term added value for owners and shareholders by managing risk in economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Organizations must adapt strategies and work systems to maintain a competitive advantage and meet stakeholder needs.

Conclusion: Sustainable business management in China involves corporate governance across five dimensions, focusing on structure, process, ethics, competence, wisdom, eco-efficiency, and sustainability report, ensuring long-term value and meeting stakeholder needs. China’s large enterprises provide high returns, contribute to society, and foster trust, transparency, and economic, social, and environmental dimensions, benefiting China’s future.

References

Allen, F., & Gale, D., (2002). A Comparative Theory of Corporate Governance. Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper. 03-27, https://ssrn.com/abstract=442841

Andrew W. Savitz, & Karl Weber. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social, and environmental success and how you can too. California: John Wiley & Sons.

Bangura, Y. (2018). Bargaining for Development: The World Bank’s 2017 World Development Report, Governance and the Law. Development and Change, 49, 644-661.

Berglof, E., & Von Thadden, E. L. (1999). The Changing Corporate Governance Paradigm: Implications for Transition and Developing Countries. Paper Presented at The Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC.

Blackburn, W.R. (2008). The sustainability handbook: The complete management guide to achieving social, economic, and environmental responsibility. Washington D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.

Chowdary, N.V. (2002). Corporate Governance: Principles and Paradigms. Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India: Hyderabad, India.

Cochran, P. & Wartick, S. (1988). Corporate Governance: A Review of the Literature. Financial Executives Research Foundation: Morristown, New Jersey.

Dagnino G.B., Minà A., & Picone P.M. (2013). The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility: Evidence from the Parmalat Case. In: Amann W., Stachowicz-Stanusch A. (eds) Integrity in Organizations. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Dalbol, J.P., & Dalbol, M.L. (2011). Sustainability and value creation. MSc. Strategy, Organization & Leadership, Copenhagen Business School, University of Copenhagen.

Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment. 11(2), 130 – 141.

Ester, R.J. (1993) Toward sustainable development: From theory to praxis. Social Development Issues, 15(3), 1 – 29.

Feleaga, N., Feleaga, L., Dragomir, V. D. & Bigioi, A. D. (2011) Corporate governance in emerging economies: The case of Romania. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 9(9), 5-16.

GRI. (2013). The external assurance of sustainability reporting: Global reporting initiative. The Netherlands, Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiatives.

Hart, S., & Milstein, M. 1999. Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. Sloan. Management Review, 41(1), 23-33.

Ho C-K. (2005) Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness: an international analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 13(2), 211-253.

Investment Promotion Department (IPD). (2018). All Approved Investment Projects by Country. Retrieved 10 March 2018, form http://www.investlaos.gov.la/images/Statistics/rpt_Invest_Summary_CountryA_2011-2015.pdf

Levitt, A. (2005). Corporate culture and the problem of executive compensation. Journal of Applied corporate finance, 17, 41–43.

Lubin, David A., and Esty, Daniel C. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review: Harvard Business School.

Nick, Freeman. J. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam: A Regional Overview. Paper Prepared for the Conference on Foreign Direct Investment: Opportunities and Challenges for Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, 16-17 August 2002, Hanoi.

Oman, C. P. (2001). Corporate Governance and National Development. An outgrowth of the OECD Development Centers Experts Workshop in 2000 and the Informal Policy Dialogue in 2001.

Rothstein, B. & Teorell, J. (2008). What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance, 21, 165-190.

Schmalensee, Richard. (2012). From green growth to sound policies: An overview. Journal Energy Economics, 34, S2 – S6.

Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.

Solomon J & Solomon A. (2004). Corporate Governance and Accountability. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex.

The World Bank Group. (2018). Ease of Doing Business in Lao PDR. 2018. Retrieved 10 March 2022 form: http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/lao-pdr

World Business Council Sustainability Development. (2000). Eco-efficiency: Creating more value with less impact. UK: WBCSE and E&Y Direct.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-15

How to Cite

Chang, S.-C. ., Li, H. ., Guo, H. ., Wei , Y.-C. ., & Wunsuk, P. . (2023). Is this Sustainability Development Framework Motivation to a Multi-National Enterprise?: Attesting Corporate Governance in China. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 3(4), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3079

Issue

Section

Articles