This is an outdated version published on 2022-04-05. Read the most recent version.

A Critical Review of Using Modified Angoff Methods for Cut-off Score Settings based on CEFR and Suggestions: A Case Study of 2 Research Articles

Authors

  • สุพัฒน์ สุกมลสันต์ รองศาสตราจารย์ ดร. สุพัฒน์ สุกมลสันต์

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PPJ.36.4

Keywords:

Modified Angoff Method, Standard Setting, CEFR

Abstract

        CEFR has had important impacts on English language teaching and learning in Thailand since 2014. At present, there are some research studies on mapping cut-off scores of English tests with CEFR Levels by 2 Modified Angoff Methods. Their findings may have high impacts on the students and education administrators because they are high-stakes tests. The author found that there
are many serious weaknesses in the studies, for example, they emphasize on reliability rather than validity, the methods are next to impossible to perform, they make use of statistics inappropriately for experts in the field to make their judgments, and their processes are illogical. Therefore, the author would like to point them out to the researchers and research consumers to make them realize their limitations. Some suggestions were provided for anyone who wants to conduct a similar study in the future to yield better results.

References

กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2557). นโยบายการปฎิรูปการเรียนการสอนภาษาอังกฤษ. Retrieved from

http://english.obec.go.th/english/2013/index.php/th/2012-08-08-10-26-5/60-2014-04-05-08-29-13

จักรกฤษ์ สาราญใจ. (2554). IOC = คว ามตรง? วา รสา รหลักสูตรแ ล ะก า ร ส อ นมหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น ปีที่ 4 ฉบับที่ 1-2. Retrieved from

https://www.scribd.com/doc/86608731/IOC

สานักงานอุดมศึกษา. (2559). นโยบายการยกระดับมาตรฐานภาษาอังกฤ ษในสถาบันอุดมศึกษา. Retrieved from

http://www.mua.go.th/users/bhes/front_home/Data%20Bhes_2559/04052559.pdf

Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.),Educational Measurement (pp. 508-600). Washington, DC:

American Council on Education.

Assessment Strategies Inc. (2014). The Angoff Method of Standard Setting. Retrieved from

https://bcrsp.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Angoff%20Method%20Article_1.pdf

Barman, A. (2008). Standard setting in Student assessment: Is a Defensible Method Yet to Come? Annals of the Academy of Medicine Journal.

Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Standard-settingin-student-assessment%3A-is-a-method-

Barman/06dc3ba6d25568d904196d952233eeafe524a3ef

Bejar, I.I. (2008). Standard Setting: What Is It? Why Is It Important? R & D Connections, No. 7. Retrieved from

https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RD_Connections7.pdf

Berk, R. A. (1986). A Consumer's Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced Tests. Journal of Review of Educational

Research, Vol. 56, No. 1. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.858.9807&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

Versions

How to Cite

สุกมลสันต์ ส. . (2022). A Critical Review of Using Modified Angoff Methods for Cut-off Score Settings based on CEFR and Suggestions: A Case Study of 2 Research Articles. Pasaa Paritat Journal, (36). https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PPJ.36.4

Issue

Section

Review Articles