Continuance Intention to Iclass E-learning for Film Institute Undergraduates at Sichuan University of Media and Communications

Authors

  • Jing Wang Ph.D. Candidate, Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management, Assumption University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0316-7533
  • Satha Phongsatha Program Director of M.Ed. Teaching and Technology, Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management, Assumption University, Bangkok, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7035-4678

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3348

Keywords:

Iclass; , Perceived Usefulness; , Confirmation; , Information Quality; , System Quality; , Service Quality; , Satisfaction; , Continuance Intention

Abstract

Background and Aim: This article's goal was to look at the most vital components that fundamentally ripple through initial degree film institute graduates at Sichuan University of Media and Communications in the Sichuan region of China who are majoring in one of four film-related fields. Perceived Usefulness (PU), Confirmation (CON), Information Quality (IQ), System Quality (SYQ), Service Quality (SEQ), Satisfaction (SAT), and Continuance Intention (CI) were all scanned into to see especially when those ideas drove learners receiving Iclass via the internet in terms of theoretical structure.

Materials and Methods: The questionnaire was given to the allocated undergraduates in the four target majors using the quantitative survey approach with 458 samples. Materials from the research were gathered in this poll implementing a simultaneous method of collection that included judgmental and quota samples. Methods for analysis of data such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Model (SEM) are currently used.

Results: The findings from data analysis confirmed all of the predictions, with interpersonal factors showing to have the strongest and most immediate impact on overall Information Quality (IQ).

Conclusion: The leadership and educational employees coming from the Sichuan University of Media and Communications in China's Sichuan province ought to highlight the latent variables that have had an enormous impact on continuance intention (CI) for the Iclass e-learning and create the tightly linked request modify by what they discover of this quantitative investigation in order during younger learners to recognize the superiority of Iclass receiving instruction via the internet.

References

Abdallah, N., Ahlan, A. R., & Abdullah, O. A. (2019). The role of quality factors on learning management systems adoption from instructor’s perspectives. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(2), 133-150.

Albelbisi, N. A. (2019). The role of quality factors in supporting self-regulated learning (SRL) skills in MOOC environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1681-1698.

Albelbisi, N. A., & Yusop, F. D. (2019). Factors Influencing Learners’ Self–Regulated Learning Skills in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 1-16.

Alkhadim, M., Gidado, K., & Painting, N. (2019). Perceived Crowd Safety in Large Space Buildings: The Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Perceived Risk Variables. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 8(1), 22-39.

Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003-2019.

Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 37(2), 187-197.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Burns, A. C., & Bush, R. F. (2019). Marketing Research, 9th edition. Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Chang, C. (2012). Exploring the determinants of e-learning systems continuance intention in academic libraries. Library Management, 34(1/2), 40-55.

Chen, C.W. (2010). Impact of quality antecedents on taxpayer satisfaction with online tax-filing systems: an empirical study. Information & Management, 47(5-6), 308-315.

Chen, S., Chen, H., & Chen, M. (2009). Determinants of satisfaction and continuance intention towards self-service technologies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(9), 1248-1263.

Cheng, Y. (2019). How does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact? Education + Training, 61(4), 480-499.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2012). The effects of information systems quality on nurses’ acceptance of the electronic learning system. Journal of Nursing Research, 20(1), 19-30.

Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three-year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 111-131.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods, 12th edition. McGraw Hill/Irwin.

Daneji, A. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Khambari, M. N. M. (2019). The effects of perceived usefulness, confirmation, and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive open online course (MOOC). Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(2), 201-214.

Davis, F. D. (1986). Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.

Durnali, M., Orakci, S., & Toraman, Ç. (2022). Distance Education Students’ Acceptance of Online Learning Systems, Attitudes Towards Online Learning and Their Self-directed Learning Skills. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 76-94.

Firomumwe, T., & Gamira, D. (2021). Evaluating Technology Acceptance in Teaching of Advanced Level Geography in Zimbabwean Secondary Schools. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 7(1), 1-14.

Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Gamage, D., Fernando, S., & Perera, I. (2015). Quality of MOOCs: A review of literature on effectiveness and quality aspects. International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing.

Gee, N. C. (2018). The impact of lecturers' competencies on students' satisfaction. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2), 74-86.

Gray, D. E. (2019). Doing research in the business world. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Hai, N. (2021). Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction with Higher Education Service Quality in Vietnam. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 339-351.

Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research Methods for Business. Education + Training, 49(4), 336-337.

Holsapple, C. W., & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67-85.

Huang, C. (2022). Research on the Practice Path of Online Teaching Reform of “Business Negotiation” Course in Universities in the “Internet+” Era. Chinese & Foreign Corporate Culture, 12(25), 191-193.

Hussein, L. A., & Hilmi, M. F. (2021). The Influence of Convenience on the Usage of Learning Management System. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(6), 504-515.

Jain, R., Sinha, G., & Sahney, S. (2011). Conceptualizing service quality in higher education. Asian Journal on Quality, 12(3), 296-314.

Karadağ, G. H., & Ayten, A. (2020). A comparative study of verification/fact-checking organizations in Turkey: dogrulukpayi.com and teyit.org. Motif Academy Journal of Folklore, 13(29), 483-501.

Larsen, T. J., Sørebø, A. M., & Sørebø, Ø. (2009). The role of task technology fits as users’ motivation to continue information system use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 778-784.

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (1-0). Sage Publications.

Lee, M.-C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: an extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506-516.

Lee, Y., & Kwon, O. (2011). Intimacy, familiarity and continuance intention: An extended expectation–confirmation model in web-based services. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(3), 342-357.

Lin, W.-S., & Wang, C.-H. (2012). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: a contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88-99.

Liu, C. T., Guo, Y. M., & Lee, C. H. (2011). The effects of relationship quality and switching barriers on customer loyalty. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 71-79.

Lwoga, E.T., & Komba, M. (2015). Antecedents of continued usage intentions of web-based learning management system in Tanzania. Education + Training, 57(7), 738-756.

Machado-Da-Silva, F. N., Meirelles, F., Filenga, D., & Filho, M. B. (2014). Student satisfaction process in virtual learning system: Considerations Based in Information and Service Quality from Brazil’s Experience. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 122-142.

Mtebe, J., & Gallagher, M. (2022). Continued usage intentions of digital technologies post-pandemic through the Expectation-Confirmation Model: the case of a Tanzanian university. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 18(1), 125-145.

Oliver, R. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.

Ozkan, S., & Kösler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: an empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285-1296.

Park, C. H., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(1), 16-29.

Polonsky, M. J., & Waller, D. S. (2015). Designing and Managing a Research Project: A Business Student's Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Prodanova, J., San-Martín, S., &Sánchez-Beato, E.J. (2021). Quality Requirements for Continuous Use of E-learning Systems at Public vs. Private Universities in Spain. Digital Education, 40, 33-50.

Rahman, M. H. A., Uddin, M. S., & Dey, A. (2021). Investigating the mediating role of online learning motivation in the COVID-19 pandemic situation in Bangladesh. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1513-1527.

Ranganathan, C., & Ganapathy, S. (2002). Key dimensions of business-to-consumer websites. Information & Management, 39(6), 457-465.

Rattanasilpkalcharn, R. (2016). A study of factors influencing behavioral intentions to repurchase towards cat café in Thailand: A case study of Cataholic café. Master’s thesis, Assumption University.

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696.

Rowley, J. (1997). Beyond service quality dimensions in higher education and towards a service contract. Quality Assurance in Education, 5(1), 7-14.

Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2018). Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face-to-face courses in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 534-543.

Taat, M. S., & Francis, A. (2020). Factors Influencing the Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning at Teacher Education Institute: An Exploratory Study in Malaysia. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 133-141.

Tam, J. L. M. (2000). The effects of service quality, perceived value, and customer satisfaction on behavioral intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing, 6(4), 31-43.

Tan, X., & Kim, Y. (2015). User acceptance of SaaS-based collaboration tools: a case of Google Docs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 423-442.

Truong, Y., & McColl, R. (2011). Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(6), 555-561.

Vankatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information System Research, 11(4), 342-365.

Wang, Y., Wang, S., Lin, H., & Tsai, H. (2019). Developing and validating a model for assessing paid mobile learning app success. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 458-477.

Xu, C., Xiao, X. P., & Lv, X. J. (2023). The status quo and thinking of online teaching in agricultural and forestry colleges and universities from the perspective of “three elements of education”. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, 2, 149-151.

Xu, F., Tian, M., Xu, G., Ayala, B.R., & Shen, W. (2017). Understanding Chinese users’ switching behaviors of cloud storage services. The Electronic Library, 35(2), 214-232.

Xu, Y. (2021). Current situation of online teaching ability of college teachers and its improvement strategies. Master’s Dissertation, West China Normal University.

Yu, Z., & Yu, X. (2019). An Extended Technology Acceptance Model of a mobile learning technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 721-732.

Yuan, K. H., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Reliable and More Powerful Methods for Power Analysis in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1-16.

Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2006). Services marketing: integrating customer focus across the firm, 4th edition. Nhà xuất bản: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Zhao, H. (2016). Factors Influencing Self-Regulation in E-learning 2.0: Confirmatory Factor Model. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(2), 1-21.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-25

How to Cite

Wang, J., & Phongsatha, S. . (2023). Continuance Intention to Iclass E-learning for Film Institute Undergraduates at Sichuan University of Media and Communications. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 3(5), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3348