Developing Model of Institution Administration based on Sufficiency Economy Conceptual for Improving Sustainability Education Quality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.1

Keywords:

Model of Institution Administration, , Sufficiency Economy Conceptual, , Improving Sustainability Education Quality.

Abstract

School administration is both the science and art of educational management. The Specific purpose aimed for developing a model of institution administration based on sufficiency economy for improving sustainability education quality into the study with the participants of key informants and samples. The collections to involved synthesizing documentary, interview questionnaires, the questionnaires to the data study the approaches and factors affecting, creating developing, and evaluating the model. Approaches to institution administration of setting the vision and mission of being a quality organization to clearly and comprehensively, the factors affecting an institution administration were the factors affecting both to direct and indirect for improving sustainability education quality. Model of institution administration based on sufficiency economy conceptual at “Key” of 5th factors were input, administration process, output, impact, and feedback. CFA. showed to all 5th factors at significant levels of 0.01. Administrators who will lead to the educational institution and personnel at the goals of improving the quality of education effectively.

References

Abraham, Stanley C. (2006). Strategic Planning a Practical Guide for Competitive Success. Ohio: Thomson South-Western.

Agbatogun, A. O. (2012). Investigating Nigerian primary school teachers’ preparedness to adopt personal response system in ESL classroom. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 377- 394.

Bush, Tony. (2018). Educational Management Administration & Leadership. "SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research".46 (6), 883–887.

Chanyaphaiboon, S. (2012). Model for the development of quality assurance within educational institutions. Doctor of Education Thesis. Educational Administration. Ubon Ratchathani: Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Connolly, Michael. (2017). "The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility". Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 47 (4), 504–519.

Cook, J. D., and Wall, T. D. (2016). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 53, 39–52.

Daniel C., Edelson, Douglas N. Gordin & Roy D. Pea. (2011). Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design. Journal of the Learning Science. 8(2), 391-450.

Draft L. Richard (2014). “Organization Management. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D. 36 (5), 65.

Gold. D. (2017). Quality of life and its measurement in osteoporosis. In: Maricic M, Gluck OS (eds) Bone disease in rheumatology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 67-79.

Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Person Prentice Hall.

Harmon, Colm, Hessel Oosterbeek, and Ian Walker. (2003). The Returns to Education: Microeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys: 17, 115- 155.

Jedaman P., & et al. (2017). Developing education in Thailand 4.0 era for the 21st century. Industrial Education Journal, 16(2), 89-99.

Jedaman, P. (2018). Human resource: Management using with your hard and brain. 2nd edition. Bangkok, Thailand: Sudprisanbuilder Publishing.

Jedaman. P., Kenaphoom, S., and et al. (2021). Analyzed and causal factor the 21st-century leadership 4.0 of science education for sustainable. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1835(2021) 012097, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012097.

Nakavej, N. (2011). Development of a dream school management model. Doctor of Education Thesis. Educational Administration and Change Leaders. Bangkok: Eastern Asia University, Thailand.

Office of the Education Council. (2017). Policies and strategies for educational development. Bangkok: The Office, Thailand.

Office of the Education Council. (2018). The 20-year National Strategy Framework of Thailand, Bangkok: The Office, Thailand.

Pimdee. P., Jedaman. P., and Others. (2017). Sufficiency Economy: Demission of Social Capital Development to the Pace of Change in the 21st Century of Thailand. Sociology and Anthropology Horizon Research Publishing: 5(9),713-718.

Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, and Coulter. (2006). Organization Behavior. 11th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Rutchareon, T., and Sripairot, W. (2011). Strategies for developing a person of learning. Bangkok, Thailand: Khawang Publishing House.

Sukamart, A, Jedaman, P, and Authors. (2017). The 21st Century of Sustainable Leadership under Education Thailand 4.0 Framework. Industrial Education Journal, 16(2),1-9.

Tantivejkul, S. (2014). Following of King Teacher of land. Bangkok: Publishers of Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Vasri, P. (2014). The sufficiency economy philosophy of His Majesty the King of Thailand social development. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Publishing.

Yukl, G. A. (2018). Leadership in Organizations. 8th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-11

How to Cite

Deeudom, P. ., Jedaman, P. ., & Jantanukul, W. (2022). Developing Model of Institution Administration based on Sufficiency Economy Conceptual for Improving Sustainability Education Quality. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.1