The Development of Evaluation Index Model for Core Literacy Basketball of University Student Major in Physical Education
Abstract
Background and Aims: The creation of an evaluation index model for core literacy in basketball is critical for accurately assessing and improving students' fundamental skills, cognitive understanding, and overall performance in the sport. This model ensures a comprehensive and standardized approach to assessing and improving basketball literacy in educational environments. Thus, the main objective of this study is to develop of evaluation index model for core literacy basketball of university students majoring in physical education. Subsidiary objectives are to survey the current situation evaluation index for core literacy basketball of university students majoring in physical education and to draft the evaluation index model for core literacy basketball of university students majoring in physical education.
Methodology: A questionnaire was used to conduct a comprehensive survey on the current status of core literacy development of sports and basketball students from four universities in Guangdong Province, and the Taro Yamane method was used to extract 1,000 students, and 340 students and 50 teachers were selected as samples. Then the literature method and expert interview method were used to draft the core literacy evaluation index model of basketball students majoring in physical education, and the Delphi method was used to modify the drafted evaluation index model for core literacy basketball of university students majoring in physical education, and then a focus group was formed to improve the evaluation index model, and finally the evaluation index model for core literacy basketball of university student major in physical education was determined through the appraisal of the expert scores. Statistics used mean, standard deviations, IQR, and median. Used Software Package.
Results: The results of the basketball evaluation index model of core literacy for college students majoring in physical education established in this study are as follows:1.Sports practices, this primary indicator contains 3 secondary indicators and 12 tertiary indicators.2.Teaching competence, this primary indicator contains 4 secondary indicators and 19 tertiary indicators.3.Sportsmanship, this primary indicator contains 2 secondary indicators and 10 tertiary indicators.4.Social adaptation, this primary indicator contains 4 secondary indicators and 15 tertiary indicators.
Conclusion: The study developed a comprehensive basketball evaluation index model for physical education majors that includes four key areas: sports practices, teaching competence, sportsmanship, and social adaptation, each with detailed sub-indicators. This model offers a structured framework for assessing and developing core basketball literacy in college students.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Brown, T., & Green, K. (2023). Constructing evaluation frameworks in sports education: Lessons from the development of a basketball core literacy model. Journal of Sports Education Research, 15(2), 321-338.
Chen, L., & Fan, Y. (2020). The impact of practical experience on core literacy in physical education: A study of basketball students. Journal of Physical Education Research, 8(3), 245-258.
Chen, Y., & Liu, H. (2019). The evolution of sports evaluation models and their impact on education. Journal of Sports Education, 34(2), 123-135.
Gao, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, H. (2019). Core literacy in physical education: A review and implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(2), 475-481.
Huang, X., & Ma, L. (2020). Standardizing sports education through comprehensive evaluation models. International Journal of Physical Education, 46(3), 87-98.
Liu, J., Zhang, M., & Chen, T. (2022). Developing core literacy evaluation models in college sports education. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 52(1), 101-115.
Liu, W., & Wang, L. (2022). The role of evaluation models in sports education: Fostering holistic development through core literacy. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 17(3), 523-537.
Liu, W., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2021). Delphi method and focus group discussions in educational assessment: A case study in physical education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 33(4), 567-585.
Smith, A., & Jones, R. (2022). Indicators of core literacy in sports education: Developing a comprehensive evaluation model. International Journal of Physical Education, 19(1), 45-63.
Tang, S. (2021). Integrating sportsmanship and social adaptation into sports literacy evaluations. Journal of Educational Assessment, 29(4), 205-219.
Wang, X., & Xiao, Q. (2020). Core literacy in sports: A comprehensive approach to student-athlete development. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(4), 276-289.
Xie, J., Li, M., & Zhao, P. (2021). Developing evaluation models for core literacy in sports: Methodological approaches and practical applications. European Physical Education Review, 27(4), 1011-1027.
Zhang, Y., & Li, J. (2020). Indicators of core literacy in basketball: A multidimensional approach. Asian Journal of Physical Education & Recreation, 26(1), 33-45.
Zhu, K., & Li, R. (2017). Historical perspectives on the development of sports evaluation criteria. Sports Science Review, 25(1), 50-65.