Effectiveness Study of Applying Earmaster for Ear Training in Chinese University Students
Abstract
Background and Aims: Although the use of technology integration in music education in China has gradually increased, there is still a lack of empirical evidence on the use of educational technology, particularly digital tools, in auditory training. Traditional auditory training methods, such as manual practice guided by a piano or teachers, had some educational value; however, in large-scale classroom settings, they were frequently hampered by individual differences, time constraints, and insufficient teaching resources, making it difficult to meet students' individualized learning needs, particularly in key areas such as pitch recognition, rhythm perception, and timbre discrimination. As a result, understanding how to use modern educational technology to improve the effectiveness of auditory training and close this gap was critical for practical purposes. Against this backdrop, this study innovatively integrated Earmaster, a digital tool specifically designed for music education, into auditory training courses at Chinese universities, to investigate its effectiveness in improving students' auditory skills. By providing personalized practice plans and instant feedback, Earmaster effectively addressed issues in traditional teaching methods caused by resource constraints or individual differences. This study used constructivist learning theory to discuss how to use Earmaster to help students improve their pitch recognition, rhythm perception, and timbre discrimination skills. This not only improved empirical research on technology in music education but also provided theoretical foundations and practical references for future educational technology applications.
Materials and Methods: This study adopts a quasi-experimental approach. The researchers selected a total of 67 first-year music students from a university in Fujian. After classifying the students according to the school's class capacity, they were divided into Music Class 1 (34 students) and Music Class 2 (33 students). Class 1 served as the control group, while Class 2 was the experimental group. The entire experiment lasted 10 weeks, with two classes per week, each lasting 90 minutes. In the first week, students were introduced to the experiment, the teaching methods, and the content. All 67 students took a pre-test to assess their actual musical abilities. Starting from the second week, the two groups underwent 8 weeks of training with the same teaching content. Music Class 1 followed traditional teaching methods, while Music Class 2 received instruction using the Earmaster software. Classroom exercises and homework were also conducted using Earmaster. In the tenth week, a post-test was conducted. The researchers compiled and analyzed the process data and post-test results, comparing the changes between the pre-test and post-test.
Results: This study integrated the digital tool Earmaster into auditory training courses at Chinese universities and demonstrated its efficacy in improving students' auditory skills. The findings revealed that after a structured intervention with Earmaster, students' performance in pitch recognition, rhythm perception, and timbre discrimination improved significantly. Earmaster addressed the issues caused by resource limitations and individual differences in large-scale classroom settings more effectively than traditional auditory training methods, using personalized exercises and instant feedback. This study not only addressed an empirical gap in the use of educational technology in auditory training, but it also provided theoretical foundations and practical references for the future use of digital tools in music education.
Conclusion: This study found that the digital tool Earmaster significantly improved students' auditory skills compared to traditional methods. It provided both empirical evidence and practical insights into the future use of digital tools in music education.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Andrianopoulou, M. (2018). The role of digital tools in music education: A constructivist approach. Journal of Music Technology & Education, 11(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.11.3.245_1
Bella, D., Giguère, M., & Peretz, I. (2007). Effects of digital tools on auditory training: A study on pitch and rhythm discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 3894-3901. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2404645
Davis, A. (2023). Enhancing auditory skills through digital tools in music education. International Journal of Music Education, 42(2), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761422110340
Gordon, E. (2007). Learning sequences in music: Skill, content, and patterns. GIA Publications.
Ho, W. C., & Law, W. W. (2009). Challenges in the integration of digital tools in Chinese music education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 29(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802634920
Johnson, R. (2015). Personalized learning environments in education technology: A perspective from the Horizon Report. Horizon Report, 2(1), 56-78.
Johnson, R. (2023). Constructivist approaches to digital auditory training tools in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 28(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edtech.2023.01.005
Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Barriers to integrating technology in Chinese music education: A cultural and institutional perspective. Journal of Music Education Technology, 16(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/22107610874503
Liu, F., & Chen, J. (2023). Evaluating the limitations of digital tools in auditory training: A quasi-experimental study in Chinese universities. Journal of Music and Auditory Education, 19(4), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31258-z
Maharaj, A. (2010). A long-term evaluation of digital tools in auditory skills training. Journal of Music Technology & Education, 12(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.12.1.50_1
Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of constructivism: A learning theory framework. Routledge.
Schüler, J. (2021). Motivation and engagement in ear training: The impact of digital tools on music students. Music Education Research Journal, 20(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2021.1951452
Smith, T., & Brown, A. (2023). The application of educational technology in auditory training and sight-singing. Journal of Music Education Innovation, 32(2), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761422110341
Webster, P. (2011). Future directions in music education technology: Integration of auditory training software. Music Technology and Education Journal, 5(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2011.604467
Williams, M., & Taylor, G. (2023). Advances in educational technology for ear training: Earmaster's role in skill development. International Review of Music Education, 31(3), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0255761422110344
Yilmaz, T. (2011). Digital tools in ear training: Effects on pitch recognition and rhythm perception. Music Education Research, 13(4), 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2011.632108
Zhang, Y. (2024). Future trends in digital tools for auditory training: The case of Earmaster. Journal of Global Music Education Research, 22(1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041381422110347