Improving Student Feedback Literacy Through Collaborative Dialogic Feedback intervention: An Action Research study at a University in Southwest China
Abstract
Background and Aim: Student feedback literacy (SFL), a group of cognitive and dispositional competencies for students to benefit from feedback, has been viewed as a key part of lifelong learning capacity. At a university in Southwest China, students and teachers reported low levels of SFL and the absence of feedback practices for cultivating SFL. The action research aims to testify to the efficacy of integrating collaborative dialogic feedback (CDF) intervention into a university course curriculum to improve SFL.
Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 76 sophomore students from a university in southwest China majoring in business English. Three rounds of collaborative dialogic feedback intervention were conducted in the experimental group (N=37), and teacher-dominated feedback was conducted in the control group (N=39). Data were collected over a 16-week semester, including the pre-and post-intervention student questionnaires of both groups, five types of student feedback documents, and post-intervention interviews of nine informants from the experimental groups.
Results: The quantitative data showed that students from the experimental group perceived significant improvement in appreciation of and readiness to engage in feedback, and eliciting, generating, processing, and enacting feedback information, with a p-value of the results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test less than 0.05, and students from the control group perceived no improvement. The content analysis of the student feedback document demonstrated a gradual improvement in the behaviors related to the six dimensions of feedback literacy during the eight feedback activities of the intervention. In the interviews, students attributed their improvement of feedback literacy to sufficient teacher support, opportunities for ongoing practices, and experiences of benefiting from being the key agent of feedback available in the collaborative dialogic feedback intervention.
Conclusion: The results of both quantitative and qualitative data support that the collaborative dialogic feedback intervention could facilitate the development of student feedback literacy.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualizing assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671–687.
Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705–714.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325.
Ducasse, A. M., & Hill, K. (2019). Developing Student Feedback Literacy Using Educational Technology and the Reflective Feedback Conversation. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 12(1), 24–37.
Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2021). A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: a theoretical framework. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 586–600.
Esterhazy, R., & Damşa, C. (2019). Unpacking the feedback process: an analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 260–274.
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019). Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: a case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 26 (2), 181-196.
Hill, J., & West, H. (2020). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 82–97.
Kleij, F. M. Van Der, Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. J. (2019). A meta-review of the student role in feedback. International Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 303–323.
Kleijn, R. A. M. De. (2021). Supporting student and teacher feedback literacy : an instructional model for student feedback processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 186–200.
Malecka, B., Boud, D., & Carless, D. (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(7), 908–922.
Man, D., Chau, M. H., & Kong, B. (2021). Promoting student engagement with teacher feedback through rebuttal writing. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 883–901.
María, F., & Annette, D. (2022). Repositioning peer marking for feedback literacy in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1202–1220.
Matthews, K. E., Tai, J., Enright, E., Carless, D., Rafferty, C., & Winstone, N. (2021). Transgressing the boundaries of ‘students as partners’ and ‘feedback’ discourse communities to advance democratic education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28 (7), 1503–1517.
Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centered framework for feedback literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540.
Reddy, K., Harland, T., Wass, R., & Wald, N. (2020). Student peer review as a process of knowledge creation through dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 825–837.
Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40.
Tam, A. C. F. (2021). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of and responses to exemplar-based dialogic feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 269–285.
To, J., & Liu, Y. (2018). Using peer and teacher-student exemplar dialogues to unpack assessment standards: Challenges and possibilities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 449-460.
Winstone, N. E., Balloo, K., & Carless, D. (2022). Discipline-specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design. Higher Education, 83(1), 57–77.
Wood, J. (2021). Making peer feedback work: the contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 327–346.
Yang, X., & Tanja, S. (2018). Teaching Reform in Chinese Undergraduate Education. Chinese Education & Society, 51(4), 245–247.
Zhan, Y. (2019). Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 973–986.
Zhan, Y. (2022). Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1087–1100.
Zhang, T., & Mao, Z. (2023). Exploring the development of student feedback literacy in the second language writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 55, 1-10.
Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(4), 883–897.
Zhu, Q., & To, J. (2021). Proactive receiver roles in peer feedback dialogue: Facilitating receivers’ self-regulation and co-regulating providers’ learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47 (8), 1200-1212.