The Survey of Student's Learning Interest in Multiple Teaching Methods in Art Theory Course in College, China

Meifang Pu
Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8619-2626
Apiradee Jansaeng
Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-2409
Keywords: Survey, Art theory Course, Multiple Teaching Methods, Learning Interest
Published: May 11, 2025

Abstract

Background and Aim: Art theory courses in China are essential for art students, but current teaching methods often lead to low engagement and difficulty in understanding abstract concepts. This study investigates the problems in existing teaching methods, analyzes students' learning interest in multiple teaching approaches across gender and majors, and provides suggestions for enhancing Art Theory courses.


Materials and Methods: The study surveyed 200 third-grade students majoring in art at Guangxi Normal University for Nationalities. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics via SPSS to identify preferences for various teaching methods.


Results: Findings indicate that experiential teaching, case-based teaching, and multimedia methods were the most favored across gender and major distinctions. Current teaching methods were considered too traditional and abstract, failing to engage students. The survey revealed key areas for improvement, such as incorporating more interactive and practical learning experiences.


Conclusion: The study concludes that blending multiple teaching methods, particularly those focusing on experiential learning and multimedia, would better stimulate student interest and engagement in Art Theory courses. Recommendations for future research include investigating the long-term impacts of diverse teaching methods on student outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite

Pu, M. ., & Jansaeng, A. . (2025). The Survey of Student’s Learning Interest in Multiple Teaching Methods in Art Theory Course in College, China. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 5(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2025.5893

Section

Articles

References

Chen, J., & Li, W. Z. (2018). Discussion on the reform model of art theory course teaching in higher education under a multicultural background. Art Education Research, 2, 92–93.

Deng, J., & Lv, J. Y. (2020). Research on the reform and innovation strategies of art theory courses in the context of applied transformation. Comparative Studies on Cultural Innovation, 9, 115–116.

Guo, S. M. (2020). Research on the teaching model of art theory courses in higher education under the background of “double innovation”. Mass Literature and Art, 21, 190–191.

Guo, W. F. (2013). Analysis of the current situation and countermeasures of art theory course teaching in private art colleges and universities. Mass Literature and Art, 9, 250–251.

Jiang, T. L. (2021). Research on the reform of art theory course teaching model guided by internet knowledge production. Jiangsu Higher Education, 4, 78–82.

Li, B. J., Chen, M., & Han, C. M. (2015). Analysis of teaching models in art theory courses in higher education. Mass Literature and Art, 23, 220–220.

Long, Z. J. (2022). Art theory courses in higher education can also be vivid and lively: Starting from my teaching of “introduction to art” in undergraduate universities. Art Life (Art China), 11, 130–131.

Tan, X. B. (2019). Application of museum resources in theoretical courses of art and design in higher vocational colleges: A case study of hunan province museum. Art Sea, 8, 105–107.

Wang, T. (2015). Reform and practice of teaching methods in applied university. Intellectual Property Publishing House.

Zhang, X. G. (2016). Practice research on “flip classroom teaching method” in art theory course in higher education. Journal of Hubei Open University, 10, 126–186.

Zhong, A. Q., & Cui, B. (2022). Reform and practice of art theory course teaching model [Paper presentation]. The 6th International Conference on Scientific and Technological Innovation and Educational Development, London.