Development of Introduction to English Literature Course Based on Blended Learning Combined with Critical Thinking Process to Enhance English Reading Ability of English Major Students in Xi’an University
Abstract
Background and Aim: This study was a research and development study. The objectives of this research were to 1) study the background information focusing on the course components and existing problems of the Introduction to English Literature Course to enhance students’ English reading ability, 2) develop an Introduction to English Literature course based on blended learning combined with critical thinking process to enhance students’ English reading ability, and 3) determine the effectiveness of implementing Introduction to English Literature Course based on blended learning combined with critical thinking process to enhance students’ English reading ability. This research was conducted in three phases: 1. Study the background information focusing on the course components and existing problems of the Introduction to English Literature Course. 2. Develop an Introduction to English Literature Course based on blended learning combined with a critical thinking process to enhance students’ English reading ability. 3. Implement an Introduction to English Literature Course based on blended learning combined with a critical thinking process.
Materials and Methods: The sample was 30 second-year students, majoring in English at Xi’an University, the People's Republic of China. They were derived by cluster random sampling from one class in 2023. The experimental design was a group post-test-only design with the criterion of 70%. The research instruments were 1) an Introduction to English Literature Course based on blended learning combined with a critical thinking process and its 8 lesson plans, 2) an English reading ability test paper with a reliability of 0.81, and 3) a students’ satisfaction questionnaire with a reliability of 0.86. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and a t-test for one sample.
Results: The results revealed that 1) Phase 1 found that the draft course components consist of six aspects: 1. principle, 2. objectives, 3. content, 4. instructional strategies, 5. media and resources 6. Assessment &evaluation 2) The problems of this course were: 1. The old principle was based on teacher-centered theory. 2. The old objectives focused on the acquisition of basic knowledge, with little attention to developing English reading ability. 3. The content was not inductive for critical thinking. 4. Instructional strategies were based on traditional methods. 5. Media and resources did not integrate new technologies. 6. The evaluation method was summative and not scientific. 2) Phase 2 found that the Introduction to English Literature Course based on blended learning combined with a critical thinking process consisted of the principles, objectives, content, instructional strategies, teaching media and resources, assessment &evaluation, which were verified by 5 experts (M=4.36, SD=0.53). The teaching process has five steps: 1: Learning online with preparation of critical thinking; 2: Learning online with incubation of critical thinking; 3: Learning offline in the classroom with illumination of critical thinking; 4: Online evaluation of critical thinking; 5: Online verification of critical thinking. 3) Phase 3 found that after the implementation of the course, students’ English reading ability (M=31.87, SD=4.37) was higher than the criterion of 70% at a significant level of .01, and satisfaction toward the learning process (M =4.30, SD=0.37) was higher than the criterion of 70% at a significant level of .01.
Conclusion: The innovation gained from this research is the course components, which consist of six aspects: principle, objectives, content, instructional strategies, media and resources, and assessment &evaluation. It can enhance the student’s English reading ability. Moreover, the developed Introduction to English Literature Course based on blended learning combined with a critical thinking process, which includes 5 steps of teaching, can enhance students’ English reading ability effectively.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Bonk, C.J., & Graham, C.R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning environments: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass/Pfeiffer.
Charles, D., Graham, C.R. et al. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 15, 3-10.
Cronje, J.C. (2020). Towards a New Definition of Blended Learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning 18(2), 1-10.
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
Dwyer, C.P. (2017). Critical Thinking: Conceptual Perspectives and Practical Guidelines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Education Review, 32(1), 81-111.
Graham Wallas. (1926). Art of Thought. London: Watts and Co.
Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Guilford J.P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Taba, H. (1970). Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
The Committee of Foreign Language and Literature Teaching Guidance for English Majors under the Ministry of Education. (2020). The Teaching Quality for Undergraduate English Majors. Ministry of Education
The Ministry of Education of China. (2018). The National Standard for the Teaching Quality of Higher Education Institutions (NSTQUEM, the National Standard). NSTQUEM, the National Standard
Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.