Implementation of Early Childhood Science Education Course Based on Inquiry-Based Learning and Phenomenon-Based Learning to Enhance Scientific Inquiry Teaching Ability of Pre-service Early Childhood Teachers
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and aim: Scientific inquiry teaching ability is one of the key abilities of science teachers to carry out inquiry teaching. In reality, many teachers lack the will and ability to implement inquiry-based teaching independently, so the opportunities and quality of students' participation in inquiry learning will also be restricted (Meng Xiulan et al., 2012). Therefore, it is of great practical significance to strengthen the cultivation of the scientific inquiry teaching ability of pre-service early childhood teachers. This study focuses on the influence of early childhood science education courses based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning on the scientific inquiry teaching ability of pre-service early childhood teachers. Expanding the breadth and depth of the research on students' core literacy in science education is helpful to the development of students' science teaching ability. The purpose of this study was to compare the scientific inquiry teaching ability and students' satisfaction of pre-service early childhood teachers after learning through the early childhood science education course based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning, with the criterion set at 70%.
Materials and methods: In this experimental study, 30 third-year students majoring in preschool education at Taizhou College of Nanjing Normal University were investigated. This study used a scoring rubric of scientific inquiry teaching ability and students' satisfaction questionnaire, with the reliability of 0.93, 091 respectively. The measurement through the research instruments was conducted after the implementation of the early childhood science education course based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning. Data were collected and analyzed by means, standard deviation, and the determined criterion of 70% by using a t-test for one sample.
Results: The study found that the mean score of students’ scientific inquiry teaching ability after learning through an early childhood science education course based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning was 19.83, out of a full score of 24, with a standard deviation of 1.72. The posttest scores of students’ scientific inquiry teaching ability were greater than the criterion of 70% at.01 level of statistical significance (t = 9.64, p=0.001). The mean scores of students’ satisfaction after learning through early childhood science education course based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning was 4.55 from the full score of 5, and the standard deviation was 0.34 which was statistically higher than the criterion of 70% at.01 level of statistical significance (t = 16.68, p=0.001). It is considered to be a large effect of early childhood science education courses based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning on the scientific inquiry teaching ability of pre-service early childhood teachers.
Conclusion: The developed early childhood science education course based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning has a significant effect on enhancing the scientific inquiry teaching ability of pre-service early childhood teachers. The early childhood science education course, based on inquiry-based learning and phenomenon-based learning, has stimulated students' initiative and enthusiasm in learning and enhanced their ability and confidence in carrying out inquiry teaching to encourage early childhood exploration of the phenomenon through questions, experiments, and hands-on activities.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
Adaktylou, N. (2020). Remote Sensing as a Tool for Phenomenon-Based Teaching and Learning at the Elementary School Level: A Case Study for the Urban Heat Island Effect. International Journal of Educational Methodology. 6(3), 517 - 531.
Akkas, E., & Eker, C. (2021). The Effect of Phenomenon-Based Learning Approach on Students' Metacognitive Awareness. Educational Research and Reviews. 16(5), 181-188.
An, Z. (2023). Research on curriculum teaching reform and Practice in the field of early childhood education under the concept of integration of production and education - A case study of "Early Childhood Science Education" course in University. Survey of Education. 12(9), 94-98.
Beyer, C. J. (2009). Developing a inquiry teaching competency in science teacher education. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
China Ministry of Education. (2012). Guidelines for the learning and development of children aged 3-6. Beijing: People's Education Press.
Edelson, D.C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 8, 391–450.
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model. The Science Teacher. 70(6), 56–59.
Funfuengfu, V. (2022). The Development of Phenomenon-Based Learning Model for Enhancing Active Learning Competencies of Teacher Students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(7), 1366-1377.
Gou, Z. (2022). Application of inquiry-based Learning in History Classroom Teaching. Master's thesis: Fu yang Normal University.
Hakala, L., & Kujala, T. (2021). A touchstone of Finnish curriculum thought and core curriculum for basic education: Reviewing the current situation and imagining the future. Prospects, 51(1), 473-487.
Hu, Q., Ding, X., Chen, L. (2019). Study on the construction of physical education curriculum system in universities under COVID-19. Journal of Chengdu University of Physical Education. 46(6), 48-59.
Islakhiyah, K., Sutopo, S., & Yulianti, L. (2016). Phenomenon-based learning to improve scientific reasoning ability in natural science learning in junior high school. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1, 992-1005.
Jia, F., Zhang, Q., & Fu, N. (2021). Research on the mixed teaching model of preschool Science Education curriculum -- and talk about preschool teacher training. Public Relations World. 509(18), 59-60.
Jiang, Z., Zhao, C., & Li, H. (2017). Study on the satisfaction of learners of open Online courses: Development, Influencing Factors and improvement direction. Modern Distance Education. 3, 34-43.
Jin, Y. (2002). Study and guidance of inquiry teaching. Beijing: China Personnel Press.
Karlsson, P. (2017). Teachers’ Perspective on the National Core Curriculum of Basic Education 2016-Finding Leverage in Supporting Upper-Comprehensive School Teachers with Phenomenon-Based Learning and Co-design. Master's thesis: Université de Aalto.
Kaur, P., & Gakhar, A. (2014). 9E model and e-learning methodologies for the optimisation of teaching and learning. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) (pp. 342-347). IEEE.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting Inquiry Learning by Promoting Normative Understanding of Multivariable Causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10115
Li, J., & Wu, X. (2021). Research on the Practice of Science Classroom Teaching in Primary Schools Based on Inquiry-Elaboration-Application Mode. Research and Practice of Science Education. 34(3),45-49.
Li, J., Li, W., & Chen, L. (2019). Constructing curriculum Ideological and political system to Enhance curriculum moral Education: A case study of early childhood Science Education and activity guidance curriculum. Journal of Gansu Normal University. 28(2), 104-108.
Lu, M. (2012). A study on teachers' inquiry teaching ability and its training. Doctoral dissertation: East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Lukman, N., Nurul, A., & Sholeh, H. (2022). Didactic Phenomenon-based Learning through Scientific Approach to Improve Students' Communication Skills. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia. 3(2), 107-120.
Ma, Y. (2019). Research on inquiring Teaching Design ability and its cultivation of Science Normal University students. Doctoral dissertation: Liaoning Normal University.
Marek, D.A. (2008). Why the learning cycle?. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 20(3), 63–69.
Marsh, D., Diaz Perez, W., & Escarzaga Morales, M. (2019). Enhancing language awareness and competence-building through a fusion of phenomenon-based learning and content and language integration. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society. 15(1), 1-11.
Martin B L.(1994). Using Distance Education to Teach Instructional Design to Preservice Teachers. Educational Technology. 34(3), 49-55.
Meng, X., Li, X., & Li, C. (2012). Basic education calls for the integration of inquiry learning into the teaching of subjects in normal universities —— Taking physics as an example. Curriculum, Textbooks and Teaching Methods. 5,123-127.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47(4), 474-496.
Nongluck, M., Oraphan, B., & Pongsatorn, M. (2022). Phenomenon-based teaching competency development for teacher educators in higher education in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 43, 727-734.
Putra, M.I.S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The development of guided inquiry science learning materials to improve science literacy skill of prospective mi teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 5(1), 83–93.
Roth, W. M. (2012). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
Sahlberg, P. (2014). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. Teachers College Press.
Sun, X. (2007). Research on Innovation of College English Teaching Mode Based on Teaching Reform. Foreign Language Audio-visual Teaching, 37(3), 54-56.
Tuenter, H., & Biemans, H. (2012). Inquiry-based science education: towards a conceptual framework of key concepts and processes. International Journal of Science Education. 34(10), 1615-1627.
Ucar, T., & Trundle, K. C. (2011). Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers & Education. 57(2), 1571–1582.
Walan, S., & Rundgren, S.N.C. (2015). Student responses to a context-and inquiry-based three-step teaching model. Teaching Science. 61(2), 33–39.
Wang, L., Sun, L., & Liu, M. (2021). Research on English Teaching Strategies in Senior High Schools Based on Students' Subjective Status. Foreign Language Audio-visual Teaching. 3, 59-64.
Wang, X., & Liu, Wi. (2020). The Current Situation and Countermeasures of Science Education in Kindergartens. Early Childhood Education, 12(3), 23-27.
Wang, Y. (2016). Exploration on practical teaching Reform of "Early Childhood Science Education" course -- taking Baotou Normal College as an example. Yinshan Journal. 29(6), 5-8.
Wang, Y. (2016). Why is science education successful in Finland? People's Education. 29(2),72-76.
Xu, P. (2017). Research on the Dimensions and Indicators of Course Satisfaction. China Educational Technology. 42(10), 105-112.
Yu, C. (2021). Exploration on curriculum teaching of preschool Science Education in Higher Vocational Colleges. Educational Observation. 10(20), 102-104.
Zhang, W., & Wang, J. (2023). Research on student satisfaction and its Influencing factors of blended teaching. Modern Vocational Education. 35(19), 89-92.
Zhou, X., & Zhang, W. (2018). Research on junior high school chemistry classroom teaching based on the "inquiry-elaboration-application" model. Education and Teaching Forum, 39(4), 92-94.