Development of the Evaluation Index System in Internal Governance Ability of Social Sports Associations in Guangdong Province
Abstract
Background and Aim: As a major sports province in China, Guangdong Province has always attached great importance to the development of sports and actively responded to the national policy deployment. Through the research on the internal governance of provincial social sports associations in Guangdong Province, the internal governance evaluation index system is established it is beneficial to the comprehensive development of social sports associations and better service for the national fitness cause, but it also conducive to the government to timely understand the current situation of social associations, more reasonable allocation of resources, overall layout. The objective of this research was to develop the evaluation index system for the internal governance ability of social sports associations in Guangdong Province.
Materials and Methods: In this research, the sample group consisted of 65 Guangdong Provincial social sports associations. A literature review, questionnaire, and interviews with seven experts were conducted to investigate the current situation of the internal governance ability of social sports associations in Guangdong Province. Based on the current situation, the researcher would draft the Delphi question framework. After that, 19 experts were invited to conduct the Delphi consensus. After three rounds of Delphi consensus, the evaluation index of the internal governance ability of social sports associations was formulated. Then, seven experts were invited to perform the connoisseurship to evaluate and revise the indicator system. Finally, by conducting an on-site investigation of 15 social sports associations in Guangdong Province, the actual operation of the index system is verified, and the development status of social sports associations in Guangdong Province is preliminarily judged according to the index system. The mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range were used to analyze the data.
Results: The evaluation index system of the internal governance ability of social sports associations consists of 5 first-level indicators, respectively: Institutional Framework, Human Resource Management, Financial Asset Management, Archive Seal Management, and Development Planning. These indicators include 18 second-level indicators and also includes 39 third-level indicators.
Conclusion: The internal governance evaluation index system of social sports associations that has been established has played a positive role in improving the governance level of associations and promoting the development of social sports undertakings. In the future, we will continue to listen to the opinions and suggestions of experts and constantly optimize and improve the index system to better adapt to the needs and challenges of the development of the association and promote the long-term, comprehensive, and orderly development of the social sports association.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Chen, H. (2019). The importance and method analysis of the evaluation index system construction. Theoretical research on urban construction. 16, 77-78.
Chen, Z., Zhu, J., & Xiao, H. (2017). Study on the classification, characteristics, and development trend of social sports organizations. Sports Science. 37(3), 61-67.
Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & O'Boyle, I. (2018). Leadership in Governance: Exploring Collective Board Leadership in Sport Governance Systems. Sport Management Review. 21(3), 221-231. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.07.007
He, H. (2015). Problems exist in the internal governance structure of social organizations. China Social News. 13, 04, 2015
Huang, H. (2018). Study on the role of social sports organizations in promoting social stability. Physical education science research. 6, 1-10.
Li, D., & Zhao, Q. (2017). Research on the performance evaluation of social organizations based on the evaluation index system. Public Administration in China. 5, 82-84.
Li, L., & Liu, C. (2018). Research on the development status and Countermeasures of social sports organizations. Sports Science and Technology Literature Bulletin. 4, 44-45.
Liang, J., & Liu, H. (2019). Research on the construction of a smart city evaluation index system based on AHP and TOPSIS. Information Technology and Informatization. 10, 118-121.
Liu, L., & Li, H. (2019). Challenges and countermeasures of the internal governance of social organizations. Private capital in China. 6, 40-41.
Liu, Q. (2020). Research on the influence of internal governance on enterprise performance. Friends of the Accounting. 8, 99-100.
Liu, W., & Liu, W. (2020). Countermeasures and suggestions for the internal governance of social organizations. Modern Economic Information. 19, 308-309.
Matthew, N., & Russell, H. (2008). Sport and Policy: Issues and Analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann publisher.
Parent, M.M., & Hoye, R. (2018). The Impact of Governance Principles on Sports Organizations’ Governance Practices and Performance: A Systematic Review. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1503578. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1503578
Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalization, sport governance, and strategic capability. Managing Leisure. 16, 108 –127. DOI: https://orcid.org/10.1080/13606719.2011.559090
Wang, J. (2016). Research on the influence of internal governance on enterprise innovation. Science and Technology Innovation Guide. 12, 67-68.
Wang, W., & Zhou, X. (2020). Research on the development, Mode, and Management innovation of social sports organizations. Sports Science and Technology Literature Bulletin. 6, 88-89.
Wang, X., & Li, H. (2019). Research on the construction of a social organization evaluation index system. Chinese social organizations. 6, 58-60.
Wang, Z., & Li, D. (2016). Study on the influence of evaluation index system construction on enterprise performance. Accounting Research. 9, 89-91.
Wu, Y., & Fu, Y. (2013). Evaluating corporate social responsibility using grey relational analysis based on a symmetry coefficient. Journal of Cleaner Production. 39, 297-308.
Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Development of a model based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for the performance evaluation of manufacturing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (5), 6351-6360.
Zhang, W., & Li, M. (2018). Research on the construction of a social organization performance evaluation index system. Social organization management. 12, 72-75.
Zheng, D. (2018). Analysis of the internal governance model of social organizations--Take A type A social organization in A city as an example. Contemporary Economic Management, 40 (8), 182-184.
Zhou, X. & Zhang, L. (2018). Study on the function and development of social sports organizations. Sports Science and Technology Literature Bulletin. 5, 78-79.