Development of Chinese Teaching Theory in Middle School Course Based on Lesson Study to Enhance Students’ Teaching Skills in Chinese Reading and Writing
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aims: This study explores challenges in the Chinese teaching theory in middle school course education at Zhoukou Normal University. Key issues include a lack of course principles, broad objectives, excessive content, outdated instructional strategies, and limited evaluation methods. The aims of this study were: 1) to identify key challenges in the Chinese teaching theory in middle school courses based on Lesson Study. 2) Develop a Lesson Study-based course for middle school Chinese teaching. 3) Evaluate the effectiveness of the newly developed course in enhancing students’ teaching skills in Chinese reading and writing, as well as their satisfaction with the criterion of 70%.
Materials and Methods: This experimental study involved 18 third-year students majoring in Chinese Language and Literature at Zhoukou Normal University. The population included 201 third-year students (6 classes), and the sample of 18 students was selected using a stratified random sampling method, with 3 students from each class. Students’ teaching skills in Chinese reading and writing, along with students’ satisfaction, were assessed using scoring rubrics. Data were analyzed using the one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test due to the small sample size (Siegel, 1956).
Results: (1) Students’ post-test scores in Chinese reading (M=39.61, SD=3.03) exceeded the 70% criterion (t=171, p=0.001). (2) Students’ post-test scores in Chinese writing (M=33.22, SD=2.76) exceeded the 70% criterion (t=171, p=0.001). (3) Student satisfaction (M=3.91, SD=0.59) was significantly above the 70% benchmark (t=161, p=0.001).
Conclusion: Implementing a Lesson Study-based approach in the Chinese teaching theory in the middle school course significantly improved students’ teaching skills in reading, writing, and overall satisfaction.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
An, G. Q. (2021). Lesson Study. East China Normal University Press.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2001). Chinese curriculum standards for full-time compulsory education (Experimental Draft). People's Education Press.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2022). Chinese curriculum standards for full-time compulsory education (2022 Edition). People's Education Press.
Doll, W. E., Jr. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. Teachers College Press.
Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson Study: A case of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Huang, G. S. (1988). Chinese education. People's Education Press.
Huang, J. C. (2017). Defining and interpreting the concepts in the curriculum. Journal of Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology, 15(4), 1–10.
Lau, D. C.-M. (2001). Analysing the curriculum development process: Three models. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 9(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360100200107
Lewis, C. (2000). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Invited address to the American Educational Research Association.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., Hurd, J., & O’Connell, M. P. (2006). Lesson Study comes of age in North America. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(4), 273–281.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Ren, S. M. (2006). The innovative ideas accumulated in the historical development of traditional Chinese language education. Scientific Education Research. https://doi.org/10.16728/j.cnki.kxdz.2006.10.010
Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill.
Song, H. Y., & Li, Y. J. (2010). Curriculum and teaching reform in middle school Chinese. China Educational Innovation Journal, 4(1), 12–16.
Sun, H. (1998). Theory and practice of modern Chinese writing teaching. East China Normal University Press.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.
Wang, R. S. (2003). Construction of Chinese language curriculum theory (Doctoral dissertation). East China Normal University.
Wang, W. Y., & Cai, M. (2020). Chinese curriculum and teaching theory. Higher Education Press.
Wu, D. P. (2020). Construction of a pre-service teacher education model based on the concept of “Lesson Study”. Teacher Education Forum, 33(1), 12–20.
Yang, Q. (2017). Study on college management and college students’ educational consumption satisfaction. Fujian Science and Technology Press.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446
Zhang, L. (2004). Preliminary exploration of teaching reform in the course of Chinese language teaching theory in middle school (Master’s thesis). Nanjing Normal University.
Zhang, T. N. (1997). Theoretical exploration of teaching skills research. Journal of Educational Science.
Zhang, Y. F. (2022). Teaching research of Chinese writing in junior middle school under the combination of reading and writing (Master’s dissertation). Shenyang Normal University.
Zhou, X. P., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Middle school Chinese curriculum and teaching theory. Peking University Press.
Zhou, Z. (2013). Lesson Study: Directness of reading teaching (Doctoral dissertation). Shanghai Normal University.
Zohrabi, M. (2008). Researching into curriculum components. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 49–69.