Social Interaction Mediated by Popular Music Among University Students in the Digital Era
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: In the digital era, popular music has become a key medium for social interaction, identity formation, and cultural participation among university students. Digital platforms such as Spotify, TikTok, and Instagram have transformed music engagement from passive consumption into an interactive social practice. This study explores how popular music shapes students' social behaviors, examining its dual role in fostering social cohesion while potentially reinforcing exclusivity and algorithmic bias.
Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating quantitative data from structured online surveys (N=500) and qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with a diverse sample of university students. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was used to examine patterns of music-mediated interactions, while thematic analysis of interview data provided deeper insights into students' experiences. The study also assessed the impact of algorithmic curation and sociocultural factors on students’ music engagement.
Results: The findings highlight three key aspects: (1) Popular music serves as a social and identity marker, with music-sharing behaviors reinforcing peer bonds but also creating taste-based exclusivity. (2) Digital and offline music interactions are deeply interconnected, as students use online platforms to coordinate real-world social experiences such as concerts and music-themed gatherings. (3) Algorithmic personalization significantly shapes students’ musical exposure, fostering convenience while also reinforcing homophilic networks that limit cross-genre exploration. Additionally, sociocultural factors such as peer influence, generational trends, and digital literacy impact how students engage with music as a social tool.
Conclusion: This study underscores the complex role of popular music in university students' digital socialization. While music strengthens peer networks and self-expression, digital infrastructures influence inclusivity and social boundaries. The findings contribute to media studies and cultural sociology by offering insights into how algorithm-driven music consumption reshapes traditional social dynamics. Future research should explore strategies to promote musical diversity and enhance the role of music as an inclusive social force in digital education and youth culture.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Anacin, C., Baker, D., & Bennett, A. (2021). Mimicking the mimics: Problematizing cover performance of Filipino local music on social media. Media, Culture & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211029888
Ávila Torres, V. (2023). Plasticine music – or the intimate social life of cultural objects. Journal of Cultural Economy, 16(6), 908–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2199428
Bennett, A. (2000). Popular music and youth culture: Music, identity, and place. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. Peter Lang.
Clark, J. N. (2024). Music, resilience and ‘soundscaping’: Some reflections on the war in Ukraine. Cultural Sociology, 18(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755231151216
DeNora, T. (2003). After Adorno: Rethinking music sociology. Cambridge University Press.
Frith, S. (1981). Sound effects: Youth, leisure, and the politics of rock ‘n’ roll. Constable.
Jarvekulg, M., & Wikstrom, P. (2022). The emergence of promotional gatekeeping and converged local music professionals on social media. Convergence, 28(5), 1358–1375. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211032376
Lonsdale, A. J., & North, A. C. (2011). Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 102(1), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X506831
Papinczak, Z. E., Dingle, G. A., Stoyanov, S. R., Hides, L., & Zelenko, O. (2015). Young people's uses of music for well-being. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(9), 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1020935
Powell, M., Olsen, K. N., Davidson, J., & Thompson, W. F. (2022). Understanding the attraction to music containing violent themes: A qualitative analysis. Psychology of Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000531
Prey, R. (2018). Nothing personal? Algorithmic individuation on music streaming platforms. Media, Culture & Society, 40(7), 1086–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717745147
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
Zhang, Q., & Negus, K. (2024). From cultural intermediaries to platform adaptors: The transformation of music planning and artist acquisition in the Chinese music industry. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241232086
