Implementation of AI on Students’ Performance in Visual Communication Design Lessons
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: This study investigates the use of Sea Art AI painting software in visual communication design education, focusing on its impact on students’ mastery of color theory, composition, and creativity. Grounded in constructivist learning theory, it aims to assess AI's effectiveness in enhancing personalized and interactive learning experiences.
Materials and Methods: A quasi-experiment using mixed methods assessed the impact of AI-assisted learning on design students’ creativity and efficiency by comparing outcomes between AI and traditional instruction groups.
Results: The results showed that the experimental group’s post-test scores were significantly higher than the control group’s in all evaluated areas. AI tools explained 29.8% to 46.4% of the variance, showing a moderate to substantial impact on learning outcomes. The greatest improvements were seen in creativity (F = 24.314, p < 0.001), visual effects (F = 11.050, p = 0.002), and font design (F = 17.996, p < 0.001). Color comprehension (F = 5.658, p = 0.021) and typography (F = 5.769, p = 0.020) showed smaller effects but were still statistically significant.
Conclusion: The study confirms AI’s effectiveness in enhancing students’ design skills and creative thinking, supporting its integration into design education. Future research should examine its long-term impact and broader applicability in personalized learning contexts.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.
Bai, Y., Huang, Z., Gao, W., Yang, S., & Liu, J. (2024). Intelligent artistic typography: A comprehensive review of artistic text design and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14774. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.14774
He, W., Zhang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2021). A model of creativity support for AI-assisted design education. Computers & Education, 160, 104025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104025
Hettiarachchi, E., Priyadarshana, S., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2021). Motivation and creativity in AI-based learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1519–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09998-4
Lee, M., Choi, H., & Kim, J. (2022). The effect of AI tutoring systems on student engagement in design education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1204–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13175
Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Liang, L. (2021). Self-efficacy and design learning: Exploring the role of AI feedback tools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1307–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211001120