The Ethical Edge: Modern Business Management Meets Environmental and Social Responsibility
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aims: Enhanced investor scrutiny, regulatory obligations, consumer lobbying, and the obvious effects of social injustice and climate change have all significantly enhanced the relevance of environmental and social responsibility in business. Ethical consumption, environmental principles, and ESG investing have all worked together to transform how businesses operate and engage with the public. In addition to evaluating theoretical frameworks like stakeholder theory, CSR, and ESG. Thus, this paper aims to consolidate existing knowledge, highlight trends, and identify research gaps in Ethical Edge.
Methodology: A qualitative documentary research technique was used to investigate company reports, case studies, regulatory frameworks, and peer-reviewed academic literature for themes. The UN SDGs, the Harvard Business Review, the IPCC, and publications from top ESG assessment organizations are examples of core sources.
Results: The findings demonstrate the growing significance of supply chain ethics and DEI, the positive correlation between ethical leadership and business resilience, and the strategic importance of environmental responsibility in sectors such as technology, fashion, and the automotive sector. ESG-aligned companies generally do better than their counterparts in terms of market value, client loyalty, and talent retention. However, there is still criticism of worldwide enforcement disparities, conflicting ESG standards, and greenwashing.
Conclusion: Ethical and sustainable business practices are no longer optional; they are now crucial to long-term viability and stakeholder trust. The future of business depends on integrated solutions that take social justice, environmental responsibility, and ethical governance into account. Continuous innovation, technology integration, and critical research are essential to advancing this shifting paradigm.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
BBC. (2020, July 6). Boohoo faces questions over factory working conditions. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53305003
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2759–2767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.022
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131
Cone Communications. (2017). Cone Communications CSR study: Consumers and employees want companies to speak out on social justice issues. https://www.conecomm.com/2017-cone-communications-csr-study-pdf
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116. https://hbr.org/2019/05/the-investor-revolution
Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116. https://hbr.org/2019/05/the-investor-revolution
Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50–60. https://hbr.org/2013/05/the-performance-frontier-innovating-for-a-sustainable-strategy
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2003.10025194
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11-100. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1799589
IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Joy, A., Sherry, J. F., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J., & Chan, R. (2012). Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fashion Theory, 16(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174112X13340749707123
Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318614
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the best for your company and your cause. Wiley.
Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346
Kotsantonis, S., Pinney, C., & Serafeim, G. (2016). ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12169
Locke, R. M. (2013). The promise and limits of private power: Promoting labor standards in a global economy. Cambridge University Press.
Mackey, J., & Sisodia, R. (2014). Conscious capitalism: Liberating the heroic spirit of business. Harvard Business Review Press.
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. (2012). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.002
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (2016). Wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, and retaliation in the U.S. government: What have researchers learned from the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) surveys? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(4), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15587998
Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77. https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Sanchez, D. (2011). Inclusive workplaces: A review and model. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.02.003
Shrivastava, P., Ivanaj, S., & Persson, S. (2019). Transdisciplinary study of sustainable enterprise. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1243–1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2317
United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI). (2020). ESG integration: How are environmental, social, and governance issues integrated in investment processes? https://www.unpri.org
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and greenwashing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4